Performance of the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate: a systematic review of Latin American studies

Background. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature to evaluate the different outcomes of microRNAs (miRNAs) in diabetic nephropathy (DN), including urinary albumin excretion rates, urinary albumin creatinine rates, glomerular filtration rate, HbAc1, and creatinine.Methods. Electronic databases including PUBMED, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched for eligible publications to July 2018. The following comparisons between treatment groups were included: normal group versus DN group; control group versus micro/macroalbuminuria group.Results. Twelve eligible studies that included 2500 participants were finally recruited in this meta-analysis. Fifteen miRNAs (miRNA-21, miRNA-181b, miRNA-194, miRNA-30, miRNA-215, and others) were upregulated whereas seven miRNAs (miRNA-26a, miRNA-126, miRNA-424, miRNA-574-3p, miR-223, miR-155, and miR-192) were downregulated in the DN group compared with control groups. The miR-133b, miR-342, miR-30, miR-192, miR-194, and miR-215 were significantly correlated in urinary albumin excretion rates (r=0.33, 95% CI= 0.26-0.39). miR-192, miR-217, miR-15b, miR-34a, and miR-636 were correlated with urinary albumin creatinine rates (r=0.69; 95% CI=0.12-0.92), while miR-133b, miR-345, miR-33, miR-326, miR-574-3p, miR-126, miR-217, miR-15b, miR-34a, and miR-636 were significantly correlated with HbAc1 (r =0.23, 95% CI = 0.15-0.31). There were twelve miRNAs that were closely related to the glomerular filtration rate (r=0.28, 95% CI =0.21-0.34). Creatinine (r=0.33, 95% CI = 0.22-0.40) was significantly different between normal and DN groups.Conclusions. The meta-analysis acquired the correlations between miRNAs and outcomes including UAER, UACR, eGFR, HbAc1, and creatinine in DN. It suggested that miRNAs may participate in the pathogenesis of DN process.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic performance of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation at estimating glomerular filtration rate in adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031558 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (8) ◽

pp. e031558 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Neda Zafari ◽

Leonid Churilov ◽

Richard J MacIsaac ◽

Niloufar Torkamani ◽

Helen Baxter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Chronic Kidney Disease ◽

Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽

Kidney Disease ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Glomerular Filtration ◽

Filtration Rate ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Index Test ◽

Disease Epidemiology

IntroductionTimely detection leading to the implementation of reno-protective measures reduces the progression of diabetic kidney disease. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a major surrogate of kidney function. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Equation is a tool to estimate GFR. This protocol outlines a systematic-review, assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the CKD-EPI equation in adults with diabetes.Methods and analysisMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and grey literature will be searched for publications in English, Farsi, Dutch and Chinese from 2009 (when CKD-EPI was first introduced) to January 2019. Bridging searches will be conducted to capture literature published from January 2019 until final review publication. The inclusion criteria will be (1) study participants with diabetes; (2) age ≥18 years; (3) creatinine-based CKD-EPI eGFR as index test; (4) measured GFR using the clearance/plasma disappearance of inulin, iohexol, iothalamate, diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (DTPA) or chromium labelled ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Cr-EDTA) as reference test; (5) report of the diagnostic accuracy of the index test. Exclusion criteria will be participants with renal transplant, chronic use of corticosteroids, chronic inflammatory diseases, pregnancy, non-diabetes related kidney disease, thalassaemia, heart failure, pregnancy and potential kidney donors as well as critically ill patients. Screening, eligibility check, risk of bias assessment and data extraction will be carried out by two independent reviewers. Any discrepancies will be discussed, and third-party opinion will be sought. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies−2 tool. A quantitative synthesis of the aggregated-data will be used if the included studies are homogenous.Ethics and disseminationNo ethics approval is required. The outcome will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The results will help researchers and clinicians evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the creatinine-based CKD-EPI eGFR in adults with diabetes.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018108776

Download Full-text

Performance of the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations to estimate the glomerular filtration rate: a systematic review of Latin American studies

10.21203/rs.2.22162/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ana Brañez-Condorena ◽

Sergio Goicochea-Lugo ◽

Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka ◽

Naysha Becerra-Chauca ◽

Virgilio E Failoc-Rojas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽

Glomerular Filtration ◽

Sensitivity And Specificity ◽

Latin American ◽

Filtration Rate ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry ◽

Grade Methodology ◽

Meta Analyses ◽

Latin American Countries

Abstract BackgroundMost commonly used equations to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are the CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD). However, it is not clear which one shows a better performance in Latin America. Objective To assess the performance of both estimated GFR (eGFR) equations in Latin American countries. Methods In January 2019, we performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and “Biblioteca Regional de Medicina” (BIREME) to identify studies that reported eGFR using CKD-EPI and MDRD equations and compared them with a measured GFR (mGFR) using exogenous filtration markers, among adults from Latin American countries. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation were performed by two reviewers independently. We performed meta-analyses of P30, bias (using mean difference [MD] and its 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]), sensitivity, and specificity; and evaluated certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results We included 12 papers, six of them were meta-analyzed (5 from Brazil and 1 from Mexico). Meta-analyses that compared CKD-EPI using creatinine measured with calibration traceable to isotope dilution mass spectrometry (CKD-EPI-Cr IDMS) and MDRD-4 IDMS did not show statistically significant differences in bias (5 studies, MD: 0.55 mL/min/1.73m 2 , 95% CI: -3.34 to 4.44), P30 (2 studies, MD: 4%, 95% CI: -4% to 13%), sensitivity (2 studies, 76% and 75%), and specificity (2 studies, 91% and 89%), with very low certainty of evidence for bias and P30, and low certainty of evidence for sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions We found that the performance of CKD-EPI-Cr IDMS and MDRD-4 IDMS do not differ significantly, although CKD-EPI-Cr IDMS tends to have a non-significant better performance in terms of P30. However, since most of the meta-analyzed studies were from Brazil, results may not be extrapolated to other Latin American countries. Trial registration CRD42019123434, PROSPERO. Registered 18 February 2019.

Download Full-text