scholarly journals Bond strength of a composite resin to an adhesive luting cement

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 322-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele ◽  
Lucas V. Zogheib ◽  
Isabela Gomes ◽  
Andressa S. Kuwana ◽  
Clóvis Pagani
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Pre Treatment

This study evaluated the influence of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of a composite resin (CR), previously submitted to the application of a temporary cement (TC), to an adhesive luting cement. Eight-four CR cylinders (5 mm diameter and 3 mm high) were fabricated and embedded in acrylic resin. The sets were divided into 6 groups (G1 to G6) (n=12). Groups 2 to 6 received a coat of TC. After 24 h, TC was removed and the CR surfaces received the following treatments: G2: ethanol; G3: rotary brush and pumice; G4: air-abrasion; G5: air-abrasion and adhesive system; G6: air-abrasion, acid etching and adhesive system. G1 (control) did not receive TC or any surface treatment. The sets were adapted to a matrix and received an increment of an adhesive luting cement. The specimens were subjected to the shear bond strength test. ANOVA and Tukeyʼs tests showed that G3 (8.53 MPa) and G4 (8.63 MPa) differed significantly (p=0.001) from G1 (13.34 MPa). The highest mean shear bond strength values were found in G5 (14.78 MPa) and G6 (15.86 MPa). Air-abrasion of CR surface associated with an adhesive system provided an effective bond of the CR to the adhesive luting cement, regardless the pre-treatment with the phosphoric acid.

scholarly journals Effects of surface treatment of provisional crowns on the shear bond strength of brackets

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josiane Xavier de Almeida ◽  
Mauren Bitencourt Deprá ◽  
Mariana Marquezan ◽  
Luciana Borges Retamoso ◽  
Orlando Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Surface Roughening ◽  
Bonding Material ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index

OBJECTIVE: To assess the adhesive resistance of metallic brackets bonded to temporary crowns made of acrylic resin after different surface treatments. METHODS: 180 specimens were made of Duralay and randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 30) according to surface treatment and bonding material: G1 - surface roughening with Soflex and bonding with Duralay; G2 - roughening with aluminum oxide blasting and bonding with Duralay; G3 - application of monomer and bonding with Duralay; G4 - roughening with Soflex and bonding with Transbond XT; G5 - roughening with aluminum oxide blasting and bonding with Transbond XT and G6: application of monomer and bonding with Transbond. The results were statistically assessed by ANOVA/Games-Howell. RESULTS: The means (MPa) were: G1= 18.04, G2= 22.64, G3= 22.4, G4= 9.71, G5= 11.23, G6= 9.67. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) ranged between 2 and 3 on G1, G2 and G3 whereas in G4, G5 and G6 it ranged from 0 to 1, showing that only the material affects the pattern of adhesive flaw. CONCLUSION: The surface treatment and the material influenced adhesive resistance of brackets bonded to temporary crowns. Roughening by aluminum blasting increased bond strength when compared to Soflex, in the group bonded with Duralay. The bond strength of Duralay acrylic resin was superior to that of Transbond XT composite resin.

scholarly journals Effect of several repair techniques on the bond strength between composite resin and degraded Y-TZP ceramic

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 377
Author(s):  
Vinícius Felipe Wandscher ◽  
Luana Brondani ◽  
Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira ◽  
Renata Marques De Melo
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Cohesive Fracture ◽  
Hydrothermal Degradation

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate the bond strength of different repair treatments for composite resin to aged Y-TZP ceramics.  <strong>Material and Methods:</strong> Zirconia blocks were cut into smaller specimens, sintered according to manufacturer’s recommendations (final dimensions of 4×4×3 mm), and randomly allocated into nine groups (n=15) according to the surface treatment and presence/absence of aging of the substrate (subjected to low-temperature degradation - LTD), as follows: without LTD (Control: without treatment; TBS: tribochemical silica coating + silane + adhesive); with LTD (Control-LTD: without treatment; TBS-LTD: TBS with hydrothermal degradation; MoS-LTD: Monobond S + adhesive; MoP-LTD: Monobond Plus + adhesive; MZP-LTD: Metal/Zirconia Primer + adhesive; USB-LTD: Single Bond Universal; AP-LTD: Alloy primer + adhesive). LTD was simulated in an autoclave (134 °C, 2 bar, 5 h). The ceramic blocks were embedded in PVC cylinders with a self-curing acrylic resin; each surface treatment protocol was performed; a composite resin cylinder (Æ: 3.25 mm and height: 3 mm) was then build-up using split metallic matrices. All the specimens were aged (thermocycling + storage in water for 90 days) and subjected to the shear bond strength test using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The failure mode was classified into four types: adhesive, composite resin cohesive fracture, ceramic cohesive fracture, and mixed. The bond strength values were subjected to Mann–Whitney test. <strong>Results:</strong> Only air-abraded samples (TBS and TBS–LTD) survived thermocycling. More than 80% of the samples of the other groups presented pre-test failures. TBS groups presented higher values of bond strength (3.94) compared to TBS-LTD (0.96). The predominant type of failure for the surviving samples were adhesive. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Air particle abrasion is mandatory to improve the bond strength of the Y-TZP substrate; an aged substrate presents an even more unfavorable scenario for adhesion.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong></p><p> Dental prosthesis repair; Hydrothermal degradation; Zirconia; Shear bond strength; Sandblasting.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Effect of Type of Surface Treatment and Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to a Non-Precious Metal Alloy

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-71
Author(s):  
Esmaeil Yasini ◽  
Mansooreh Mirzaie ◽  
Hamid Kermanshah ◽  
Elahe Habibi ◽  
Fariba Motevasselian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Precious Metal ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Metal Alloy

Shear bond strength between acrylic resin teeth and composite resin

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. e38-e39
Author(s):  
M.A. Basílio ◽  
K.V. Cardoso ◽  
G.M.R.M. De Souza ◽  
E.M. Mariscal ◽  
J.N. Arioli-Filho
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Acrylic Resin

scholarly journals Fracture resistance of incisal tooth fragment reattached with different adhesive materials and retentive techniques

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Fábio Herrmann Coelho-de-Souza ◽  
Guilherme Fossá ◽  
Flávia Ávila Pereira ◽  
Celso Afonso Klein-Júnior ◽  
Maria Carolina Guilherme Erhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Adhesive Materials ◽  
Group 1

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated in vitro the shear bond strength of experimentally fractured human tooth fragments reattached with different adhesive materials and retentive techniques.METHODS: Forty-eight sound mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=8). Their incisal edges were cut off in 5 groups, representing an enamel-dentin fracture. Intact teeth were used as control (Group 1). The fragment edges were reattached with adhesive system (Scotch Bond Multipurpose – 3M ESPE) (Group 2), adhesive system and composite resin (ICE – SDI) (Group 3), adhesive system and composite resin with circumferential bevel (Group 4), adhesive system and composite resin with internal dentin groove (Group 5), and adhesive system and composite resin with the circumferential bevel and internal dentin groove (Group 6). Shear bond strength was determined in a universal testing machine. Fracture modes were identified by light microscope. Kruskal-Wallis was used to analysis resistance to fracture and fracture patterns.RESULTS: The results showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) among groups. The intact teeth (Group 1) showed higher fracture resistance than the other groups. Groups 2 and 6 did not differ and were statistically superior to other techniques. Group 4 presented statistically higher than in Group 5, which in turn was more resistant than Group 3.CONCLUSIONS: None of the fragment reattachment techniques was able to achieve the strength of sound teeth. Fragments reattached only with adhesive system or with adhesive system and composite resin with the circumferential bevel and internal dentin groove showed the best performance for resistance to fracture.

scholarly journals Impact of Intracoronal Dentin Treatment Prior to Bleaching on Bond Strength of Restorative Materials

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 519-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Moreno Zanconato-Carvalho ◽  
João Felipe Bruniera ◽  
Natália Spadini de Faria ◽  
Vivian Colucci ◽  
Danielle Cristine Messias
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Bleaching Procedure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Restorative Materials

Surface treatment of dentin before the bleaching procedure may affect its permeability and influence the bond strength of restorative materials. This study evaluated the influence of surface treatment before the bleaching on shear bond strength (SBT) of restorative materials to intracoronal dentin. Dentin slabs were subjected to surface treatment: no bleaching (control - CON), no surface treatment + bleaching (HP), 37% phosphoric acid + bleaching (PA) and Er:YAG laser + bleaching (L). After the bleaching procedure, specimens (n=10) were restored with: microhybrid composite resin (MH), flowable composite resin (F), and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). The shear test was carried out. ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) showed significant difference for surface treatment and restorative materials (p<0.05). CON presented higher STB and was statistically different from HP (p<0.05). PA and L showed intermediate values and were statistically similar to CON and HP (p>0.05). STB for MH and F were higher than RMGIC (p<0.05), and did not differ from each other (p>0.05). The surface treatments with phosphoric acid and Er:YAG laser before the bleaching procedure provided shear bond strength at the same level of unbleached dentin and the composite resins presented superior bond strength to the intracoronal dentin.

scholarly journals Optimization of Heat-Dried Silane Application for CAD/CAM Ceramic Resin Bonding

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Greciana Bruzi Brasil Pinto ◽  
MAGNE P ◽  
BRUZI G ◽  
CARVALHO A ◽  
ENCISO R ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Boiling Water ◽  
Hot Air Drying ◽  
Air Drying ◽  
Hot Air ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Cad Cam

Purpose. Evaluate surface treatments and silane application methods and their effect on shear bond strength (SBS) before and after aging. Materials and methods. Slices of IPS e.max CAD and Vitablocs Mark II, were embedded in acrylic resin. The block was randomly assigned to 5 groups; E:etching with hydrofluoric acid (HF), rinsing, followed by cleaning in ultrasonic bath; E/S:HFetching and cleaned as group E followed by silane application for 20s, air drying and hot drying; E/S+:HFetching and cleaned as group E, followed by silane application for 60s, air drying and hot air drying, rinsing with boiling water and hot air drying; S:silane application for 20s followed by air drying and hot air drying; S+:silane application for 60s followed by air drying, air drying and hot air drying, rinsing in boiling water and hot drying. Cylinders of composite resin (n=12) were bonded with adhesive. SBS testing was carried out after 24h or after thermocycling for groups E; E/S and E/S+. Results. For 24h SBS showed significantly higher mean bond strength with E/S, for both ceramic, compared to E and E/S+. The use of silane alone showed significantly lower mean bond strength. No significant differences were found between E/S and E/S+ for VITA. The SBS was negatively affected by simulated aging in E/S group and positively in E/S+. Conclusions. The association of HFetching and a heat-dried silane showed to be significant to obtain a high SBS. Furthermore, the optimized silane application is not relevant to the immediate SBS while it enhances after aging.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document