scholarly journals Craniofacial analysis of the Tweed Foundation in Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusion

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo César Tukasan ◽  
Maria Beatriz Borges de Araújo Magnani ◽  
Darcy Flávio Nouer ◽  
Paulo Roberto Aranha Nouer ◽  
João Sarmento Pereira Neto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
The Difference ◽  
School Of Dentistry ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

This study has defined the cephalometric values of the Craniofacial Analysis of the Tweed Foundation for a sample of Brazilian subjects. The sample consisted of 211 cephalometric radiographs from subjects aged 12-15, which were divided into two groups: Class II group, with 168 lateral teleradiographs (cephalograms) of white Brazilian subjects, with Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusion, of both genders (82 males and 86 females); and the Control Group, with 43 lateral teleradiographs (cephalograms) of subjects whose occlusion was clinically excellent, and also of both genders (21 males and 22 females). The teleradiographs were selected from the files of the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, previously to the orthodontic treatment. The results demonstrated no sexual dimorphism for each group, as attested by the Student's t-test. The exploratory analysis (± 0.5 standard deviation) enabled the tolerance limits to be determined and a Craniofacial Analysis Table to be constructed using the respective cephalometric intervals. In addition, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant according to the maxilla position. The maxilla was in a good position in relation to the cranial base. On the other hand, the mandible was retruded in relation to the cranial base in the Class II cases. The skeletal pattern was not defined because only the Facial Height Index (FHI) showed a vertical pattern in Class II subjects, while the Y Axis, SN.PlO, SN.GoMe and FMA values did not show any statistically significant difference between the groups. The Class II division 1 subjects showed lower incisors more labially tipped and a convex facial profile.

scholarly journals Agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor in an Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion patient

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 108-117
Author(s):  
Guilherme Thiesen
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Occlusal Plane ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Maxillary Lateral Incisor ◽  
Dentofacial Orthopedics ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The present case report describes the orthodontic treatment of a patient with agenesis of maxillary left lateral incisor and Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. The patient also presented with maxillary midline deviation and inclination of the occlusal plane in the anterior region. Treatment objectives were: correction of sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible; correction of midline deviation, so as to cause maxillary and mandibular midlines to coincide; correction of overbite and leveling of the occlusal plane, so as to create ideal conditions for esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth. This case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) as a requirement for the title of certified by the BBO.

The outcome of a two-phase treatment in a patient with Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion and an excessive overjet

2009 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-94
Author(s):  
Yoko Takigawa ◽  
Yuji Sanma ◽  
Setsuko Uematsu ◽  
Kenji Takada
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

scholarly journals Comparative Cephalometric Analysis of Angle Class II Division 1 Malocclusion between Chinese Male and Female Subjects

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-23
Author(s):  
Bishnu Prasad Sharma ◽  
Chang Xin
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Cephalometric Analysis ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Craniofacial Features ◽  
Chinese Male ◽  
Chinese Subjects ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Objective: To compare the craniofacial features of male and female Chinese samples with Angle Class II Division 1 malocclusion.Materials & Method: The cephalometric radiographs were obtained from 39 Chinese subjects (mean age17.18 ± 7.1 years) with Angle Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Ten skeletal, nine dental and three soft tissue variables were investigated.Result: The craniofacial features between Chinese genders showed statistical significant differences among only one of the twenty-two variables studied.Conclusion: Chinese males have anteriorly long face compare to females.

scholarly journals Perawatan Ortodontik Alat Lepasan Kombinasi Semi-Cekat pada Kehilangan Gigi 46

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Maharetta Ditaprilia ◽  
Wayan Ardhana ◽  
Christnawati Christnawati
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Fixed Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Removable Appliances ◽  
Lower Arch ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Salah satu pertimbangan dalam menentukan alat ortodontik yang akan digunakan adalah biaya. Alat ortodontik lepasan dipilih karena memerlukan biaya yang lebih rendah dibanding dengan alat ortodontik cekat. Perawatan ortodontik dengan alat lepasan sulit dilakukan jika disertai dengan pencabutan satu atau beberapa gigi posterior. Pasien perempuan usia 23 tahun, mengeluhkan gigi rahang atas maju dan gigi rahang bawah berjejal. Pemeriksaan objektif menunjukkan protrusif rahang atas, crowding rahang bawah, palatal bite, disertai kehilangan gigi 46. Maloklusi Angle Kelas II divisi 1 tipe dentoskeletal, hubungan skeletal klas II, protrusif bimaksilar, bidental protrusif, overjet 7,2 mm, crowding, palatal bite, dan kebiasaan bernafas melalui mulut. Perawatan menggunakan kombinasi alat semi-cekat pada rahang bawah dan alat lepasan pada rahang atas. Alat semi-cekat digunakan untuk space clossing bekas pencabutan gigi 46. Terjadi space closing bekas pencabutan gigi 46 setelah 6 bulan perawatan. Overjet berkurang menjadi 4 mm dan overbite 2,7 mm setelah 1 tahun perawatan. Kombinasi alat semi-cekat pada rahang bawah dan alat ortodontik lepasan pada rahang atas efektif untuk koreksi maloklusi Angle Klas II divisi 1 dengan kehilangan gigi 46 pada pasien ini. ABSTRACT: Orthodontic Treatment Using Semi-Fixed Appliances with Partial Edentulous 46. Cost is one of the considerations in determining the use of orthodontic appliances. Removable orthodontic appliance is chosen because it is less costly than fixed orthodontic appliances. It is difficult to use removable orthodontic appliances to treat a missing one or more posterior teeth case. A 23 year old female patient had a chief complaint of crowding in lower anterior teeth and forwardly placed upper anterior teeth. Her objective examination shows protrution of upper teeth, crowding in the lower arch, palatal bite, and partial edentulous of 46 tooth. It was Angle Class II division 1 dentoskeletal malocclusion, skeletal class II, bimaxillary protrusion, bidental protrusion, overjet 7,2 mm, crowding, palatal bite, and mouth-breathing habit. The treatment used a combination of semi-fixed orthodontic appliances in the lower arch and removable appliances in the upper arch. The semi-fixed orthodontic appliances were used on space closing of partial edentulous 46. The partial edentulous 46 was closed after 6 months of treatment. The overjet was reduced to 4 mm and overbite 2,7 mm after one year of treatment. The combination of semi-fixed orthodontic appliances in the lower arch and removable appliances in the upper arch generate a good result to correct Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with partial edentulous 46.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document