scholarly journals Copula Duration, Insemination, and Sperm Allocation in Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae)

2014 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 858-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald B. Thomas ◽  
Sandra N. Leal ◽  
Hugh E. Conway

Author(s):  
José Arredondo ◽  
Juan F. Aguirre‐Medina ◽  
José S. Meza ◽  
Jorge Cancino ◽  
Francisco Díaz‐Fleischer


BioControl ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florida López-Arriaga ◽  
Pablo Montoya ◽  
Jorge Cancino ◽  
Jorge Toledo ◽  
Pablo Liedo


1995 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1348-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Joo Lee ◽  
Albert B. DeMilo ◽  
Daniel S. Moreno ◽  
Adelaido J. Martinez


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Demont ◽  
Paul I Ward ◽  
Wolf U Blanckenhorn ◽  
Stefan Lüpold ◽  
Oliver Y Martin ◽  
...  

Abstract Precise mechanisms underlying sperm storage and utilization are largely unknown, and data directly linking stored sperm to paternity remain scarce. We used competitive microsatellite PCR to study the effects of female morphology, copula duration and oviposition on the proportion of stored sperm provided by the second of two copulating males (S2) in Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae), the classic model for sperm competition studies. We genotyped all offspring from potentially mixed-paternity clutches to establish the relationship between a second male’s stored sperm (S2) and paternity success (P2). We found consistent skew in sperm storage across the three female spermathecae, with relatively more second-male sperm stored in the singlet spermatheca than in the doublet spermathecae. S2 generally decreased with increasing spermathecal size, consistent with either heightened first-male storage in larger spermathecae, or less efficient sperm displacement in them. Additionally, copula duration and several two-way interactions influenced S2, highlighting the complexity of postcopulatory processes and sperm storage. Importantly, S2 and P2 were strongly correlated. Manipulation of the timing of oviposition strongly influenced observed sperm-storage patterns, with higher S2 when females laid no eggs before being sacrificed than when they oviposited between copulations, an observation consistent with adaptive plasticity in insemination. Our results identified multiple factors influencing sperm storage, nevertheless suggesting that the proportion of stored sperm is strongly linked to paternity (i.e., a fair raffle). Even more detailed data in this vein are needed to evaluate the general importance of sperm competition relative to cryptic female choice in postcopulatory sexual selection.



Author(s):  
Jose Sánchez ◽  
Kary G. Trujillo ◽  
Jose E. Sánchez ◽  
Karina Guillen ◽  
Ana P. Barba-de la Rosa ◽  
...  


Fruit Flies ◽  
1993 ◽  
pp. 285-287
Author(s):  
E. Pinson ◽  
W. Enkerlin ◽  
S. Arrazate ◽  
A. Oropeza
Keyword(s):  


1996 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 971-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. MARCONATO ◽  
D.Y. SHAPIRO


Ethology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solana Abraham ◽  
M. Teresa Vera ◽  
Diana Pérez-Staples


2006 ◽  
Vol 274 (1607) ◽  
pp. 209-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Engqvist ◽  
Klaus Reinhold

Sperm competition theory predicts that when males are certain of sperm competition, they should decrease sperm investment in matings with an increasing number of competing ejaculates. How males should allocate sperm when competing with differently sized ejaculates, however, has not yet been examined. Here, we report the outcomes of two models assuming variation in males' sperm reserves and males being faced with different amounts of competing sperm. In the first ‘spawning model’, two males compete instantaneously and both are able to assess the sperm competitive ability of each other. In the second ‘sperm storage model’, males are sequentially confronted with situations involving different levels of sperm competition, for instance different amounts of sperm already stored by the female mating partner. In both of the models, we found that optimal sperm allocation will strongly depend on the size of the male's sperm reserve. Males should always invest maximally in competition with other males that are equally strong competitors. That is, for males with small sperm reserves, our model predicts a negative correlation between sperm allocation and sperm competition intensity, whereas for males with large sperm reserves, this correlation is predicted to be positive.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document