Flight response of the California fivespined ips,Ips paraconfususLanier (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), to lure treatments

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd Murray
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. S281-S282
Author(s):  
F. Ullah ◽  
T. Dos Anjos-Garcia ◽  
R. De Oliveira ◽  
I.R. Santos ◽  
N.C. Coimbra

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 014002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Derakhshan ◽  
Mohammad Mikaeili ◽  
Ali Motie Nasrabadi ◽  
Tom Gedeon

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 1404-1411
Author(s):  
Mahsa Rahmani ◽  
Mousa Mohammadnia-Afrouzi ◽  
Hamid Reza Nouri ◽  
Sadegh Fattahi ◽  
Haleh Akhavan-Niaki ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e0202679
Author(s):  
Ryo Nakano ◽  
Andrew C. Mason

1973 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 427 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kehat ◽  
M Wyndham

The relationships between food, egg-laying, age, and flight were studied with the aim of providing a better understanding of the causal factors of displacement flights in N. vinitor. The distinction in N. vinitor between "fliers" and "non-fliers" is, most probably, a reflection of the environment. Thus, an increased proportion of individuals taking off and of distinctively prolonged flights were a response to inadequate food either during the nymphal or adult stage. Shortage of water during the adult stage resulted also in increased flight activity. The quality of the food consumed by the nymphs rather than its quantity affected the behavioural flight response of emerging adults. Immature females, whether virgin or not, had different flight responses from egg-laying females and are probably the true migrants of the species. Displacement flights in N. vinitor are always triggered by adverse conditions in the nymphal or adult stage, but the type of flight changes as females become older; flights are migratory in the immature females and dispersive in the mature ones.


Science ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 270 (5236) ◽  
pp. 644-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. P. Jansen ◽  
X. V. Nguyen ◽  
V. Karpitskiy ◽  
T. C. Mettenleiter ◽  
A. D. Loewy

Author(s):  
Angela Duckworth ◽  

For more than a century, scientists have known that acute stress activates the fight-or-flight response. When your life is on the line, your body reacts instantly: your heart races, your breath quickens, and a cascade of hormones sets off physiological changes that collectively improve your odds of survival. More recently, scientists have come to understand that the fight-or-flight response takes a toll on the brain and the body—particularly when stress is chronic rather than acute. Systems designed to handle transient threats also react to stress that occurs again and again, for weeks, months, or years. It turns out that poverty, abuse, and other forms of adversity repeatedly activate the fight-or-flight response, leading to long-term effects on the immune system and brain, which in turn increase the risk for an array of illnesses, including asthma, diabetes, arthritis, depression, and cardiovascular disease. Pioneering neuroscientist Bruce McEwen called this burden of chronic stress “allostatic load.”


Author(s):  
David Anthony Pittaway

The Covid-19 pandemic accelerated the global trend towards spending increasing amounts of time online. I explore some of the potential negative consequences of lockdown-induced increases in time spent online, and I argue that the stressful context of the pandemic and lockdowns is exacerbated by being online beyond that which is required for essential purposes. Time spent online may increase stress levels by perpetuating the sympathetic nervous system's fight-or-flight response, draining a person’s energy and diminishing one’s ability to deal with illness. I frame the situation as one in which the pandemic context, combined with a mandatory need to be online more, forces many people into what Daniel Kahneman calls “System 1 thinking”, or “fast thinking”. I argue that digital hygiene requires the suspension of System 1 thinking, and that “philosophical perception” resonates with potential remedies in this regard.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document