scholarly journals Forgetting in Modular Answer Set Programming

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 2843-2850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Gonçalves ◽  
Tomi Janhunen ◽  
Matthias Knorr ◽  
João Leite ◽  
Stefan Woltran
Keyword(s):  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Input Output ◽  
Impossibility Results ◽  
Modular Programming ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Large Software ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

Modular programming facilitates the creation and reuse of large software, and has recently gathered considerable interest in the context of Answer Set Programming (ASP). In this setting, forgetting, or the elimination of middle variables no longer deemed relevant, is of importance as it allows one to, e.g., simplify a program, make it more declarative, or even hide some of its parts without affecting the consequences for those parts that are relevant. While forgetting in the context of ASP has been extensively studied, its known limitations make it unsuitable to be used in Modular ASP. In this paper, we present a novel class of forgetting operators and show that such operators can always be successfully applied in Modular ASP to forget all kinds of atoms – input, output and hidden – overcoming the impossibility results that exist for general ASP. Additionally, we investigate conditions under which this class of operators preserves the module theorem in Modular ASP, thus ensuring that answer sets of modules can still be composed, and how the module theorem can always be preserved if we further allow the reconfiguration of modules.

scholarly journals Module theorem for the general theory of stable models

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 719-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSEPH BABB ◽  
JOOHYUNG LEE
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
General Class ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Splitting Theorem ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Input Output ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Output Interface ◽  
Stable Models ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractThe module theorem by Janhunen et al. demonstrates how to provide a modular structure in answer set programming, where each module has a well-defined input/output interface which can be used to establish the compositionality of answer sets. The theorem is useful in the analysis of answer set programs, and is a basis of incremental grounding and reactive answer set programming. We extend the module theorem to the general theory of stable models by Ferraris et al. The generalization applies to non-ground logic programs allowing useful constructs in answer set programming, such as choice rules, the count aggregate, and nested expressions. Our extension is based on relating the module theorem to the symmetric splitting theorem by Ferraris et al. Based on this result, we reformulate and extend the theory of incremental answer set computation to a more general class of programs.

scholarly journals Grounding and Solving in Answer Set Programming

AI Magazine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Kaufmann ◽  
Nicola Leone ◽  
Simona Perri ◽  
Torsten Schaub
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

Answer set programming is a declarative problem solving paradigm that rests upon a workflow involving modeling, grounding, and solving. While the former is described by Gebser and Schaub (2016), we focus here on key issues in grounding, or how to systematically replace object variables by ground terms in a effective way, and solving, or how to compute the answer sets of a propositional logic program obtained by grounding.

scholarly journals onlineSPARC: A Programming Environment for Answer Set Programming

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELIAS MARCOPOULOS ◽  
YUANLIN ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Programming Environment ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
School Students ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Simple Interface ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractRecent progress in logic programming (e.g. the development of the answer set programming (ASP) paradigm) has made it possible to teach it to general undergraduate and even middle/high school students. Given the limited exposure of these students to computer science, the complexity of downloading, installing, and using tools for writing logic programs could be a major barrier for logic programming to reach a much wider audience. We developed onlineSPARC, an online ASP environment with a self-contained file system and a simple interface. It allows users to type/edit logic programs and perform several tasks over programs, including asking a query to a program, getting the answer sets of a program, and producing a drawing/animation based on the answer sets of a program.

SeaLion: An eclipse-based IDE for answer-set programming with advanced debugging support

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 657-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAULA-ANDRA BUSONIU ◽  
JOHANNES OETSCH ◽  
JÖRG PÜHRER ◽  
PETER SKOČOVSKÝ ◽  
HANS TOMPITS
Keyword(s):  
Source Code ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Model Driven Engineering ◽  
Development Environment ◽  
Integrated Development ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Class Diagrams ◽  
The Rich ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractIn this paper, we present SeaLion, an integrated development environment (IDE) for answer-set programming (ASP).SeaLionprovides source-code editors for the languages ofGringoandDLVand offers popular amenities like syntax highlighting, syntax checking, code completion, visual program outline, and refactoring functionality. The tool has been realised in the context of a research project whose goal is the development of techniques to support the practical coding process of answer-set programs. In this respect,SeaLionis the first IDE for ASP that provides debugging features that work for real-world answer-set programs and supports the rich languages of modern answer-set solvers. Indeed,SeaLionimplements a stepping-based debugging approach that allows the developer to quickly track down programming errors by simply following his or her intuitions on the intended semantics. Besides that,SeaLionsupports ASP development using model-driven engineering techniques including domain modelling with extended UML class diagrams and visualisation of answer sets in corresponding instance diagrams. Moreover, customised visualisation as well as visual editing of answer sets is realised by the Kara plugin ofSeaLion. Further implemented features are a documentation generator based on the Lana annotation language, support for external solvers, and interoperability with external tools.SeaLioncomes as a plugin of the popular Eclipse platform and provides interfaces for future extensions of the IDE.

scholarly journals Learning weak constraints in answer set programming

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 511-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARK LAW ◽  
ALESSANDRA RUSSO ◽  
KRYSIA BRODA
Keyword(s):  
Inductive Logic ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Learning Task ◽  
Learning Preferences ◽  
Learning Framework ◽  
Hypothesis Space ◽  
New Learning ◽  
Weak Constraints ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractThis paper contributes to the area of inductive logic programming by presenting a new learning framework that allows the learning of weak constraints in Answer Set Programming (ASP). The framework, calledLearning from Ordered Answer Sets, generalises our previous work on learning ASP programs without weak constraints, by considering a new notion of examples asorderedpairs of partial answer sets that exemplify which answer sets of a learned hypothesis (together with a given background knowledge) arepreferredto others. In this new learning task inductive solutions are searched within a hypothesis space of normal rules, choice rules, and hard and weak constraints. We propose a new algorithm, ILASP2, which is sound and complete with respect to our new learning framework. We investigate its applicability to learning preferences in an interview scheduling problem and also demonstrate that when restricted to the task of learning ASP programs without weak constraints, ILASP2 can be much more efficient than our previously proposed system.

scholarly journals Complex optimization in answer set programming

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 821-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARTIN GEBSER ◽  
ROLAND KAMINSKI ◽  
TORSTEN SCHAUB
Keyword(s):  
Computational Complexity ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Pareto Efficiency ◽  
Modeling Techniques ◽  
Complex Optimization ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Implementation Technique ◽  
Preference Handling ◽  
Answer Set ◽  
Qualitative Preferences

AbstractPreference handling and optimization are indispensable means for addressing nontrivial applications in Answer Set Programming (ASP). However, their implementation becomes difficult whenever they bring about a significant increase in computational complexity. As a consequence, existing ASP systems do not offer complex optimization capacities, supporting, for instance, inclusion-based minimization or Pareto efficiency. Rather, such complex criteria are typically addressed by resorting to dedicated modeling techniques, likesaturation. Unlike the ease of common ASP modeling, however, these techniques are rather involved and hardly usable by ASP laymen. We address this problem by developing a general implementation technique by means of meta-prpogramming, thus reusing existing ASP systems to capture various forms of qualitative preferences among answer sets. In this way, complex preferences and optimization capacities become readily available for ASP applications.

scholarly journals Graphs and colorings for answer set programming

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 61-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATHRIN KONCZAK ◽  
THOMAS LINKE ◽  
TORSTEN SCHAUB
Keyword(s):  
Proof Theory ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Algorithmic Approach ◽  
Dependency Graphs ◽  
Basic Strategy ◽  
Content System ◽  
Formal Properties ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

We investigate the usage of rule dependency graphs and their colorings for characterizing and computing answer sets of logic programs. This approach provides us with insights into the interplay between rules when inducing answer sets. We start with different characterizations of answer sets in terms of totally colored dependency graphs that differ in graph-theoretical aspects. We then develop a series of operational characterizations of answer sets in terms of operators on partial colorings. In analogy to the notion of a derivation in proof theory, our operational characterizations are expressed as (non-deterministically formed) sequences of colorings, turning an uncolored graph into a totally colored one. In this way, we obtain an operational framework in which different combinations of operators result in different formal properties. Among others, we identify the basic strategy employed by the noMoRe system and justify its algorithmic approach. Furthermore, we distinguish operations corresponding to Fitting's operator as well as to well-founded semantics.

scholarly journals Optimizing Answer Set Computation via Heuristic-Based Decomposition

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (04) ◽  
pp. 603-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANCESCO CALIMERI ◽  
SIMONA PERRI ◽  
JESSICA ZANGARI
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Decomposition Techniques ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Experimental Activity ◽  
Performance Of Systems ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractAnswer Set Programming (ASP) is a purely declarative formalism developed in the field of logic programming and non-monotonic reasoning: computational problems are encoded by logic programs whose answer sets, corresponding to solutions, are computed by an ASP system. Different, semantically equivalent, programs can be defined for the same problem; however, performance of systems evaluating them might significantly vary. We propose an approach for automatically transforming an input logic program into an equivalent one that can be evaluated more efficiently. One can make use of existing tree-decomposition techniques for rewriting selected rules into a set of multiple ones; the idea is to guide and adaptively apply them on the basis of proper new heuristics, to obtain a smart rewriting algorithm to be integrated into an ASP system. The method is rather general: it can be adapted to any system and implement different preference policies. Furthermore, we define a set of new heuristics tailored at optimizing grounding, one of the main phases of the ASP computation; we use them in order to implement the approach into the ASP systemDLV, in particular into its grounding subsystemℐ-DLV, and carry out an extensive experimental activity for assessing the impact of the proposal.

scholarly journals A common view on strong, uniform, and other notions of equivalence in answer-set programming

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEFAN WOLTRAN
Keyword(s):  
Syntactic Structure ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Common View ◽  
Complexity Bounds ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Implementation Method ◽  
The One ◽  
Answer Set Semantics ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractLogic programming under the answer-set semantics nowadays deals with numerous different notions of program equivalence. This is due to the fact that equivalence for substitution (known as strong equivalence) and ordinary equivalence are different concepts. The former holds, given programs P and Q, iff P can be faithfully replaced by Q within any context R, while the latter holds iff P and Q provide the same output, that is, they have the same answer sets. Notions in between strong and ordinary equivalence have been introduced as theoretical tools to compare incomplete programs and are defined by either restricting the syntactic structure of the considered context programs R or by bounding the set $\A$ of atoms allowed to occur in R (relativized equivalence). For the latter approach, different $\A$ yield properly different equivalence notions, in general. For the former approach, however, it turned out that any “reasonable” syntactic restriction to R coincides with either ordinary, strong, or uniform equivalence (for uniform equivalence, the context ranges over arbitrary sets of facts, rather than program rules). In this paper, we propose a parameterization for equivalence notions which takes care of both such kinds of restrictions simultaneously by bounding, on the one hand, the atoms which are allowed to occur in the rule heads of the context and, on the other hand, the atoms which are allowed to occur in the rule bodies of the context. We introduce a general semantical characterization which includes known ones as SE-models (for strong equivalence) or UE-models (for uniform equivalence) as special cases. Moreover, we provide complexity bounds for the problem in question and sketch a possible implementation method making use of dedicated systems for checking ordinary equivalence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document