scholarly journals Answer Set Programming: An Introduction to the Special Issue

AI Magazine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Brewka ◽  
Thomas Eiter ◽  
Miroslaw Truszczynski
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Representation ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Declarative Programming ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Answer Set

This editorial introduces answer set programming, a vibrant research area in computational knowledge representation and declarative programming. We give a brief overview of the articles that form this special issue on answer set programming and of the main topics they discuss.

Answer Sets and the Language of Answer Set Programming

AI Magazine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Lifschitz
Keyword(s):  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Declarative Programming ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Programming Paradigm ◽  
Introductory Article ◽  
Answer Set Semantics ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Semantics Of Logic Programs ◽  
Answer Set

Answer set programming is a declarative programming paradigm based on the answer set semantics of logic programs. This introductory article provides the mathematical background for the discussion of answer set programming in other contributions to this special issue.

scholarly journals Constraint Answer Set Programming: Integrational and Translational (or SMT-based) Approaches

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
YULIYA LIERLER
Keyword(s):  
Automated Reasoning ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Satisfiability Modulo Theories ◽  
Declarative Programming ◽  
Scheduling Problems ◽  
New Horizons ◽  
Research Areas ◽  
Constraint Processing ◽  
Answer Set

Abstract Constraint answer set programming or CASP, for short, is a hybrid approach in automated reasoning putting together the advances of distinct research areas such as answer set programming, constraint processing, and satisfiability modulo theories. CASP demonstrates promising results, including the development of a multitude of solvers: acsolver, clingcon, ezcsp, idp, inca, dingo, mingo, aspmt2smt, clingo[l,dl], and ezsmt. It opens new horizons for declarative programming applications such as solving complex train scheduling problems. Systems designed to find solutions to constraint answer set programs can be grouped according to their construction into, what we call, integrational or translational approaches. The focus of this paper is an overview of the key ingredients of the design of constraint answer set solvers drawing distinctions and parallels between integrational and translational approaches. The paper also provides a glimpse at the kind of programs its users develop by utilizing a CASP encoding of Traveling Salesman problem for illustration. In addition, we place the CASP technology on the map among its automated reasoning peers as well as discuss future possibilities for the development of CASP.

Special issue on answer set programming

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Balduccini ◽  
Stefan Woltran
Keyword(s):  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Answer Set

scholarly journals Advancing Lazy-Grounding ASP Solving Techniques – Restarts, Phase Saving, Heuristics, and More

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 609-624
Author(s):  
ANTONIUS WEINZIERL ◽  
RICHARD TAUPE ◽  
GERHARD FRIEDRICH
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Representation ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
First Time ◽  
Domain Independent ◽  
Large Improvement ◽  
Answer Set ◽  
Art Techniques

AbstractAnswer-Set Programming (ASP) is a powerful and expressive knowledge representation paradigm with a significant number of applications in logic-based AI. The traditional ground-and-solve approach, however, requires ASP programs to be grounded upfront and thus suffers from the so-called grounding bottleneck (i.e., ASP programs easily exhaust all available memory and thus become unsolvable). As a remedy, lazy-grounding ASP solvers have been developed, but many state-of-the-art techniques for grounded ASP solving have not been available to them yet. In this work we present, for the first time, adaptions to the lazy-grounding setting for many important techniques, like restarts, phase saving, domain-independent heuristics, and learned-clause deletion. Furthermore, we investigate their effects and in general observe a large improvement in solving capabilities and also uncover negative effects in certain cases, indicating the need for portfolio solving as known from other solvers.

scholarly journals Thedlvhexsystem for knowledge representation: recent advances (system description)

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 866-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPH REDL
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Representation ◽  
Real World ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Current Status ◽  
System Description ◽  
Recent Advances ◽  
Real World Applications ◽  
External Sources ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractThedlvhexsystem implements thehex-semantics, which integrates answer set programming (ASP) with arbitrary external sources. Since its first release ten years ago, significant advancements were achieved. Most importantly, the exploitation of properties of external sources led to efficiency improvements and flexibility enhancements of the language, and technical improvements on the system side increased user's convenience. In this paper, we present the current status of the system and point out the most important recent enhancements over early versions. While existing literature focuses on theoretical aspects and specific components, a bird's eye view of the overall system is missing. In order to promote the system for real-world applications, we further present applications which were already successfully realized on top ofdlvhex.

scholarly journals Enhancing Lazy Grounding with Lazy Normalization in Answer-Set Programming

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 2694-2702
Author(s):  
Jori Bomanson ◽  
Tomi Janhunen ◽  
Antonius Weinzierl
Keyword(s):  
Asymptotic Behavior ◽  
Knowledge Representation ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Space And Time ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Representation Formalism ◽  
Answer Set

Answer-Set Programming (ASP) is an expressive rule-based knowledge-representation formalism. Lazy grounding is a solving technique that avoids the well-known grounding bottleneck of traditional ASP evaluation but is restricted to normal rules, severely limiting its expressive power. In this work, we introduce a framework to handle aggregates by normalizing them on demand during lazy grounding, hence relieving the restrictions of lazy grounding significantly. We term our approach as lazy normalization and demonstrate its feasibility for different types of aggregates. Asymptotic behavior is analyzed and correctness of the presented lazy normalizations is shown. Benchmark results indicate that lazy normalization can bring up-to exponential gains in space and time as well as enable ASP to be used in new application areas.

scholarly journals The Seventh Answer Set Programming Competition: Design and Results

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARTIN GEBSER ◽  
MARCO MARATEA ◽  
FRANCESCO RICCA
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Representation ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
The State ◽  
International Conference ◽  
Knowledge Representation Language ◽  
Representation Language ◽  
The University ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractAnswer Set Programming (ASP) is a prominent knowledge representation language with roots in logic programming and non-monotonic reasoning. Biennial ASP competitions are organized in order to furnish challenging benchmark collections and assess the advancement of the state of the art in ASP solving. In this paper, we report on the design and results of the Seventh ASP Competition, jointly organized by the University of Calabria (Italy), the University of Genova (Italy), and the University of Potsdam (Germany), in affiliation with the 14th International Conference on Logic Programming and Non-Monotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2017).

scholarly journals Tractable answer-set programming with weight constraints: bounded treewidth is not enough

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
REINHARD PICHLER ◽  
STEFAN RÜMMELE ◽  
STEFAN SZEIDER ◽  
STEFAN WOLTRAN
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Representation ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Knowledge Representation And Reasoning ◽  
Cardinality Constraints ◽  
Bounded Treewidth ◽  
Straightforward Application ◽  
Intractable Problems ◽  
Important Extension ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractCardinality constraints or, more generally, weight constraints are well recognized as an important extension of answer-set programming. Clearly, all common algorithmic tasks related to programs with cardinality or weight constraints – like checking the consistency of a program – are intractable. Many intractable problems in the area of knowledge representation and reasoning have been shown to become linear time tractable if the treewidth of the programs or formulas under consideration is bounded by some constant. The goal of this paper is to apply the notion of treewidth to programs with cardinality or weight constraints and to identify tractable fragments. It will turn out that the straightforward application of treewidth to such class of programs does not suffice to obtain tractability. However, by imposing further restrictions, tractability can be achieved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document