scholarly journals Geriatric Assessment‐Identified Deficits in Older Cancer Patients With Normal Performance Status

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor A. Jolly ◽  
Allison M. Deal ◽  
Kirsten A. Nyrop ◽  
Grant R. Williams ◽  
Mackenzi Pergolotti ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 494-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazzaro Repetto ◽  
Lucia Fratino ◽  
Riccardo A. Audisio ◽  
Antonella Venturino ◽  
Walter Gianni ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To appraise the performance of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in elderly cancer patients (≥ 65 years) and to evaluate whether it could add further information with respect to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 363 elderly cancer patients (195 males, 168 females; median age, 72 years) with solid (n = 271) or hematologic (n = 92) tumors. In addition to PS, their physical function was assessed by means of the activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales. Comorbidities were categorized according to Satariano’s index. The association between PS, comorbidity, and the items of the CGA was assessed by means of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: These 363 elderly cancer patients had a good functional and mental status: 74% had a good PS (ie, lower than 2), 86% were ADL-independent, and 52% were IADL-independent. Forty-one percent of patients had one or more comorbid conditions. Of the patients with a good PS, 13.0% had two or more comorbidities; 9.3% and 37.7% had ADL or IADL limitations, respectively. By multivariate analysis, elderly cancer patients who were ADL-dependent or IADL-dependent had a nearly two-fold higher probability of having an elevated Satariano’s index than independent patients. A strong association emerged between PS and CGA, with a nearly five-fold increased probability of having a poor PS (ie, ≥ 2) recorded in patients dependent for ADL or IADL. CONCLUSION: The CGA adds substantial information on the functional assessment of elderly cancer patients, including patients with a good PS. The role of PS as unique marker of functional status needs to be reappraised among elderly cancer patients.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. S73-S74
Author(s):  
H. Wildiers ◽  
P. Heeren ◽  
A. Artz ◽  
R. Audisio ◽  
R. Bernabei ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Extermann ◽  
Matti Aapro ◽  
Roberto Bernabei ◽  
Harvey Jay Cohen ◽  
Jean-Pierre Droz ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3131-3131
Author(s):  
Naeem Tahir ◽  
Jerome H. Goldschmidt ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
Marek S. Poniewierski ◽  
Debra A. Wolff ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Although 60% of all malignancies occur in patients ≥65, this population is poorly represented in cancer clinical trials. While fit elderly patients appear to tolerate chemotherapy as well as younger individuals, less is known about chemotherapy tolerance in older cancer patients with poor performance status or co-morbidities. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of patient and disease characteristics on the reported toxicities of cancer chemotherapy. Methods: This study represents part of a prospective, nationwide registry based at 137 randomly selected practice sites throughout the US. The major malignancies considered were cancers of the breast (33%), colon (10%), lung (19%) and ovary (7%) along with malignant lymphoma (8%). To date, 3422 patients have been registered of which 2719 are available for analysis including 1083 patients age ≥65 (40%). Primary outcome measures were: relative dose intensity (RDI) compared to standard doses, anemia (Hgb <10), neutropenia (neutrophils <1000) and non-hematologic toxicities pertinent to older adults including stomatitis, diarrhea, anorexia, dehydration and weight loss. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the difference between the 65–74 and ≥75 age groups. Results: Complete data were available on 927 patients ≥65 years of age. Among breast cancer patients, increasing age (<65, 65–74, ≥75) was associated with progressively less Grade III/IV neutropenia (62%, 51% and 41%), respectively (p=0.006). This corresponds to patients receiving progressively less RDI (93.4%, 91.3%, 89.8%; P=.025) with 17%, 19% and 25% receiving RDI <85%, respectively. Most of the reduced RDI was planned in patients ≥75 years compared with less than half in younger patients (P=.035). Non-breast cancer patients experienced no significant difference in rates of Grade III/IV neutropenia by age. Increasing age was associated with progressively more anemia (27%, 34%, and 44%) respectively (p<0.0001) among non-breast cancer patients but not among those with breast cancer. Despite a trend, no significant increase in non-hematologic toxicities was observed with increasing age in breast cancer or non-breast cancer patients. Factors significantly associated with Grade III/IV neutropenia in univariate analysis included baseline ANC <3000, BSA<2.0, female gender and anthracycline containing regimens. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for tumor type and performance status the following were significant predictors of Grade III/IV neutropenia: BSA<2.0 (OR=1.5 p=0.04), Baseline ANC<3000 (OR=2.0 p=0.001) and anthracycline containing regimen (OR=3.5 p<0.0001). Factors associated with non-hematologic toxicity in univariate analysis included colon cancer (p<0.0001), Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 3 (p=0.068), ECOG performance status ≥2 (p=0.05), and 5-Fluorouracil containing regimens (p<0.0001) while in multivariate analysis, only the CCI maintained a trend towards increased non-hematologic toxicity (p=0.069). Conclusions: While anemia increases with age in non-breast cancer patients, neutropenia decreases with increasing age in breast cancer patients, most likely as a result of age-related reductions in RDI.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18140-e18140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Jara-Almonte Edwards ◽  
Xiaotao Zhang ◽  
Ming Sun ◽  
Juhee Song ◽  
Colin P.N. Dinney ◽  
...  

e18140 Background: More than 60% of cancer patients are older adults, and by 2020 the proportion of older adults with cancer will rise to 70%. Objective: To assess risk factors for overall survival (OS) in older cancer patients seen in a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: This is a single center, retrospective cohort study of older cancer patients (65 years of age and older). Patients receiving active cancer care underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment (including cognitive, mood, functional, nutritional, physical, and comorbidity assessment using validated scales). Hematologic, and solid tumors (urologic, breast, gastrointestinal cancers) were evaluated. Targeted interventions were implemented. Analysis: Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with OS (SAS 9.4). Results: Among 304 eligible patients, the median follow-up was 12.7 months, 98 (32%) died, the median OS was 25.4 months. Median age is 78 years. Univariate analysis revealed known risk factors for mortality (advanced age [p = 0.004], and metastatic disease [p = 0.002]), functional impairment (ADL scores 0-4, p = 0.02), and major depression (p = 0.005). Comorbidity (p = 0.07) and functional impairment showed a marginal significance on OS. Factors with a univariate p-value less than 0.1 were considered in multivariable regression models. A final multivariable model included age group, cancer stage, functional impairment, and major depression. Risk factors for OS include major depression (HR 1.88 (95% CI, 1.12, 3.15), p-value = 0.02), functional impairment (HR 2.47 (95% C.I. 1.28, 4.74), p = 0.007), and metastatic disease (HR 2.2 (95% C.I. 1.30, 3.97), p = 0.004). Conclusions: Major depression and functional impairment were identified as risk factors for OS in older cancer patients. Prospective studies are recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document