Evidence for Nest-Site Fidelity but Not Natal Homing in Bog Turtles (Glyptemys muhlenbergii)

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne K. Macey ◽  
Purva B. Vaidya ◽  
Caroline Chiu ◽  
J. Alan Clark ◽  
Kevin T. Shoemaker
The Auk ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 812-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary R. Hepp ◽  
Robert A. Kennamer

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Freund ◽  
Ofer Bahat ◽  
Uzi Motro

We studied the use of nest-sites by Griffon Vultures (Gyps fulvus) and the breeding success in these sites during 1998–2002 in Gamla Nature Reserve (Israel). Nest-sites in which a breeding attempt succeeded in fledging a young, were more likely to be occupied by nesting vultures in the following breeding season, than nest-sites that experienced a failure. This suggests that Griffon Vultures in Gamla used a Win–Stay/Lose–Shift strategy regarding nest-site fidelity.


2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kailen A. Mooney ◽  
Jon R. Haloin

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 451 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Priddel ◽  
Robert Wheeler

Nesting activity of a population of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata), isolated within a small mallee remnant in central New South Wales, was monitored annually between the summers of 1986–87 and 1998–99. A total of 148 nesting events was recorded. Only once was a new mound constructed rather than an old one reworked. Birds began and finished work on the mound progressively later each month (October to January). Nest-site fidelity was highly variable; some pairs persisted with the same mound for up to nine years while others relocated between a cluster of two, three or four mounds. Males displayed greater nest-site fidelity than females. After the loss of a partner, males tended to continue to use mounds they had used previously whereas females often relocated to a new mound. All individuals were monogamous. Pair bonds were maintained for life but, following the death of a partner, new bonds were quickly established with another unattached individual. Established pairs occasionally failed to breed, all such failures being coincident with years of low rainfall. Pairs that did not breed generally began construction of a nest but failed to complete the task. As far as can be ascertained, unpaired birds did not construct nests. The malleefowl population was characterised by a rapid turnover of breeding individuals, a high rate of adult mortality and a lesser rate of recruitment. The maximum longevity recorded for breeding adults was 12 years; average longevity was 7.5 years. Twenty-five adults were lost from the breeding population over a period of 9 years; meanwhile, 14 birds entered the breeding population. Thus, the ratio of adult mortality to recruitment was 1.79 : 1.00. Between 1986–87 and 1997–98 the population declined from at least 32 breeding adults to 14, at an average exponential rate of decrease of 0.075. Large population decreases were coincident with years of low rainfall. This population of malleefowl is predicted to become extinct by 2008.


The Condor ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 1053-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mark Jenkins ◽  
Ronald E. Jackman

1999 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Piatt ◽  
Nancy L. Naslund ◽  
Thomas I. Van Pelt

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
Edith Katsnelson Ilan ◽  
Orli Bobek ◽  
Adiv Gal ◽  
David Saltz ◽  
Uzi Motro

We studied Lesser Kestrels’ (Falco naumanni) conditional nest-site fidelity, i.e., fidelity that depends on the outcome of the previous nesting attempt in that site. In particular, we were interested in examining whether individual kestrels practice a Win–Stay/Lose–Shift (WSLS) strategy towards their nest-sites; that is, does the tendency to use the same nest-site increase following a successful nesting season, but decrease following a failure. For that purpose, we documented the use of nest-sites by Lesser Kestrels and the breeding success in these sites during 1998–2003 in the city of Jerusalem (Israel). We found that while Lesser Kestrels do not practice WSLS strategy towards their nest-site, the males (but not the females) do so towards their sub-colony – they tend to stay in the same sub-colony if their nesting was successful, whereas they tend to migrate to a different sub-colony after failure. A possible explanation to this sexual difference in WSLS behavior can arise from the fact that changing a sub-colony entails a change of hunting area. The male, being the main food provider in the Lesser Kestrel, may be more sensitive to this opportunity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document