Inhibin secretion by the sheep ovary during the luteal and follicular phases of the oestrous cycle and following stimulation with FSH

1988 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Tsonis ◽  
A. S. McNeilly ◽  
D. T. Baird
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Follicular Development ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Pituitary Cells ◽  
Luteal Regression ◽  
Follicular Maturation ◽  
Prostaglandin F ◽  
Late Follicular Phase ◽  
Multiple Follicular Development

ABSTRACT The secretion of oestradiol and inhibin were measured during the follicular and luteal phase of the cycle by a sensitive bioassay using sheep pituitary cells in culture in four ewes in which the left ovary had been autotransplanted to the neck. On day 12 of the cycle, premature luteal regression was induced with an injection of 100 μg cloprostenol (prostaglandin F2α analogue; PG) and ovarian venous blood was collected every 4 h for 72 h. These same four ewes were infused in the ensuing cycle with NIH-oFSH-S14 at 10 μg/h for 48 h immediately after an injection of PG and sampled as above. During the luteal phase ( − 2 h before PG) both in the control and FSH-infused cycles the inhibin secretion rate (SR) was 27–45 units/min. After PG injection, the inhibin SR declined with time to reach 3·6–5 units/min at the onset of the LH surge (60 h after PG) in the control cycle. In contrast, in the following cycle infusion of FSH after PG injection caused a slight increase in the inhibin SR which then remained raised at 42–50 units/min for up to 60 h after PG. In the late follicular phase the oestradiol SR was greater in the FSH-infused than in the control cycles, indicating multiple follicular development. In the FSH-infused cycle the preovulatory surges of LH and FSH were markedly attenuated. These data demonstrate that (1) inhibin SR is high during the luteal phase suggesting that the sheep corpus luteum secretes inhibin, (2) in the control cycle inhibin SR declines during follicular maturation at a time when oestradiol SR is increasing but FSH levels are decreasing, and (3) exogenously administered FSH stimulates the secretion of inhibin from the ovary during the follicular phase. J. Endocr. (1988) 117, 283–291

Ovarian secretion rates and peripheral concentrations of inhibin in normal and androstenedione-immune ewes with an autotransplanted ovary

1990 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. K. Campbell ◽  
D. T. Baird ◽  
A. S. McNeilly ◽  
R. J. Scaramuzzi
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Active Immunization ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Secretion Rate ◽  
Luteal Function ◽  
Prostaglandin F ◽  
Ovarian Inhibin ◽  
Secretion Rates

ABSTRACT Active immunization of sheep against androstenedione results in an increase in ovulation rate that is associated with increased plasma levels of LH and progesterone, but not FSH. Although immunized ewes have more activated follicles the secretion rate of oestradiol is not increased. An experiment was conducted to examine the effect of androstenedione immunity on the ovarian secretion and peripheral plasma concentrations of inhibin. Merino ewes in which the left ovary had been autotransplanted to a site in the neck were divided into control (n = 5) and androstenedione-immune (n = 6) groups. Ovarian and jugular venous blood was collected every 10 min at two stages of the follicular phase, 21–27 h and 38–42 h after a luteolytic dose of an analogue of prostaglandin F2α (PG), and every 15 min for 6 h on day 10 of the subsequent luteal phase. The ewes were monitored regularly for luteal function by measurement of the concentration of progesterone and preovulatory LH surges. The concentration of inhibin in jugular and ovarian venous plasma was determined by radioimmunoassay and ovarian secretion rates and peripheral concentrations are expressed as pg of 1–26 peptide fragment of the α chain. The ovarian secretion rate of inhibin tended to be greater in androstenedione-immune ewes at all stages of the oestrous cycle measured, with this difference being statistically significant (P <0·05) during the luteal phase (100±40 and 260±80 (s.e.m.) pg/min for control and immune groups respectively). The pattern of ovarian inhibin secretion exhibited pulsatile-like fluctuations which were not associated with LH pulses. Peripheral concentrations of inhibin were generally higher in immunized than in control ewes with this difference being significant (P < 0·01) from day 4 to 14 of the luteal phase (59±5 and 110±7 ng/1 for control and immune respectively). The ovarian secretion rate of immunoactive inhibin was greater (P <0·01) during the follicular phase than during the luteal phase in both groups of ewes, and peripheral concentrations of inhibin increased (P < 0·001) following injection of PG in ewes from both treatment groups. We concluded that androstenedione immunity results in an increase in ovarian inhibin secretion, an effect that can probably be attributed to the greater number of large oestrogenic follicles present in the ovaries of these ewes. Furthermore, this increase in the concentration of inhibin may override any decrease in the negative feedback effects of ovarian steroid produced by immunization and, hence, explain the paradoxical findings of normal concentrations of FSH and raised concentrations of LH in ewes which are immunized against androstenedione. Journal of Endocrinology (1990) 127, 285–296

ENDOCRINE CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH LUTEAL REGRESSION IN THE EWE; THE SECRETION OF OVARIAN OESTRADIOL, PROGESTERONE AND ANDROSTENEDIONE AND UTERINE PROSTAGLANDIN F2α THROUGHOUT THE OESTROUS CYCLE

1976 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. BAIRD ◽  
R. B. LAND ◽  
R. J. SCARAMUZZI ◽  
A. G. WHEELER
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Prostaglandin F2α ◽  
Significant Rise ◽  
Functional Regression ◽  
Luteal Regression ◽  
Progesterone Secretion ◽  
Ovulatory Follicle ◽  
Prostaglandin F ◽  
Relationship Of

SUMMARY The concentrations of oestradiol, androstenedione, progesterone and prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) were measured in utero-ovarian venous blood collected throughout six oestrous cycles in two ewes with utero-ovarian autotransplants. The secretion of oestradiol was closely correlated with that of androstenedione (r = 0·67, P < 0·001) indicating a common origin from the Graafian follicle. The concentration of these two steroids fluctuated at random throughout the luteal phase with the maximum secretion occurring about 2 days before the onset of oestrus. Functional regression of the corpus luteum, as indicated by a fall in the secretion of progesterone, began on day 12 or day 13, i.e. about 4 days before the onset of oestrus. In five of the six cycles the first significant rise in the secretion of PGF2α occurred on days 12–14 at the time of decline of progesterone secretion, although the release of PGF2α was maximal on the day before the onset of oestrus. There was very little release of PGF2α from the uterus before day 12. The temporal relationship of these events suggests that the uterus will only release PGF2α after it has been primed for 7–10 days with progesterone. The initiation of luteal regression is independent of secretion of oestradiol by the pre-ovulatory follicle which may, however, stimulate the further release of PGF2α responsible for irreversible structural luteolysis on the day of pro-oestrus.

SECRETION OF BIOACTIVE INHIBIN BY THE OVARY OF THE BOOROOLA MERINO EWE WITH OR WITHOUT A COPY OF THE FECUNDITY (F) GENE.

1988 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. R5-R8 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Tsonis ◽  
D. T. Baird ◽  
B. K. Campbell ◽  
J. A. Downing ◽  
R. J. Scaramuzzi
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Pituitary Cells ◽  
F Gene ◽  
Progesterone Secretion ◽  
Early Follicular Phase ◽  
Late Follicular Phase ◽  
Secretion Rates ◽  
Sampling Times ◽  
Low Rate

ABSTRACT The secretion rates of bioactive inhibin, oestradiol and progesterone were measured during the mid-luteal phase and at various times during the follicular phase of the cycle by a sensitive bioassay using sheep pituitary cells in culture in 12 Booroola ewes with and without copies of the Fecundity (F) gene in which the left ovary had been auto-transplanted to the neck. Inhibin secretion was high during the luteal phase and fell in the early follicular phase in all genotypes (P < 0.01). In Booroola ewes with a F/- genotype, inhibin secretion then increased again, towards luteal rates, in the mid and late follicular phases. In Booroola ewes without a copy of the F gene (+/+) inhibin secretion remained low at all three sampling times in the follicular phase. The secretion rate of inhibin at 36 h (P < 0.1) and 48 h (P < 0.01) were significantly lower in ewes from the +/+ (no copy of the gene) ewes than in F/(one copy of the gene) ewes. Oestradiol secretion was low during the luteal phase and increased steadily during the early (24 h) to a plateau in the mid (36 h; P < 0.01) and late (48 h; P < 0.05) follicular phase. Progesterone secretion was high during the luteal phase, and decreased to a very low rate by 24 h after prostaglandin (PG) treatment (P < 0.001) and remained low. At 24 h after PG the concentration of FSH was significantly lower (P < 0.01) than that during the luteal phase and remained suppressed until the onset of the LH surge. There were no significant differences in LH concentrations. We conclude that (1) the secretion of inhibin by the ovary is highest in the luteal phase and (2) inhibin secretion is significantly raised during the mid to late follicular phase in Booroola ewes with a copy of the Fecundity gene compared with those without.

Pulsatile secretion of inhibin, oestradiol and androstenedione by the ovary of the sheep during the oestrous cycle

1990 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. K. Campbell ◽  
G. E. Mann ◽  
A. S. McNeilly ◽  
D. T. Baird
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Pulse Amplitude ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Early Follicular Phase ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Late Follicular Phase

ABSTRACT The pattern of pulsatile secretion of inhibin, oestradiol and androstenedione by the ovary at different stages of the oestrous cycle in sheep was studied in five Finn–Merino ewes in which the left ovary had been autotransplanted to the neck. The ewes had jugular venous blood samples collected at 4-hourly intervals from 42 h before the induction of luteolysis by i.m. injection of cloprostenol (100 μg) on day 10 of the oestrous cycle, until day 3 of the following cycle. There were five periods of intensive blood sampling, when both ovarian and jugular venous blood samples were collected, as follows: (a) mid-luteal phase, before the second injection of cloprostenol on day 10 (15-min intervals for 6 h); (b) early follicular phase, 24 h after the second injection of cloprostenol (10-min intervals for 4 h); (c) late follicular phase, 48 h after the second injection of cloprostenol (10-min intervals for 4 h); (d) after the LH surge on day 1 of the cycle, 76 h after the second injection of cloprostenol (10-min intervals for 4 h); (e) early luteal phase on day 3 of the cycle, 120 h after the second injection of cloprostenol (10-min intervals for 3 h). Plasma was collected and the samples assayed for LH, FSH, progesterone, oestradiol, androstenedione and inhibin. The ovarian secretion rates for oestradiol, androstenedione and inhibin were calculated. All ewes responded normally to the luteolytic dose of cloprostenol with the preovulatory surge of LH occurring within 56·4±1·6 h (mean ± s.e.m.) followed by the establishment of a normal luteal phase. The pulse frequency of LH, oestradiol and androstenedione increased in the transition from the luteal to the follicular phase (P<0·01). On day 1 of the cycle LH secretion consisted of low-amplitude high-frequency pulses (1·0±0·1 pulse/h) to which androstenedione, but not oestradiol, responded. On day 3 of the cycle LH secretion was similar to that on day 1 but both androstenedione and oestradiol secretion were pulsatile in response to LH, indicating the presence of oestrogenic follicles. The stage of the cycle had no significant effects on LH pulse amplitude and nadir but the ovarian secretory response to LH stimulation did vary with the stage of the cycle. Prolactin pulse frequency, amplitude and nadir were higher (P<0·05) during the follicular phase than the luteal phase. Prolactin pulse frequency was depressed (P<0·05) on day 1 of the cycle but increased to follicular phase levels on day 3. Prolactin pulse frequency was significantly correlated to oestradiol pulse frequency (r = 0·54; P<0·01). During the luteal phase there were insufficient oestradiol pulses to obtain an estimate of pulse amplitude and nadir but both these parameters reached their highest level during the late follicular phase, fell to negligible levels on day 1 and increased to early follicular phase levels on day 3. Androstenedione pulse amplitude and nadir exhibited similar but less marked variation. Inhibin secretion was episodic at all stages of the cycle examined but did not exhibit significant variation with stage of cycle in any of the parameters of episodic secretion measured. Inhibin pulses were not related to either LH or prolactin at any stage of the cycle. FSH secretion was not detectably pulsatile but jugular venous concentrations of FSH at each stage of the oestrous cycle were negatively correlated with mean oestradiol (r= −0·52; P<0·01 but not inhibin secretion (r = 0·19). We conclude that (i) LH secretion is pulsatile at all stages of the oestrous cycle but the steroidogenic responses of the ovary varies with the stage of the cycle, reflecting changes in characteristics of the follicle population, (ii) ovarian inhibin secretion is episodic and displays little change with the stage of the oestrous cycle and (iii) episodic inhibin secretion is not related to either pulses of LH or prolactin. The aetiology of these inhibin pulses therefore remains unknown. Journal of Endocrinology (1990) 126, 385–393

scholarly journals Injury Incidence Across the Menstrual Cycle in International Footballers

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Martin ◽  
Kate Timmins ◽  
Charlotte Cowie ◽  
Jon Alty ◽  
Ritan Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Tendon Injuries ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Injury Incidence ◽  
Rate Ratios ◽  
Late Follicular Phase

Objectives: This study aimed to assess how menstrual cycle phase and extended menstrual cycle length influence the incidence of injuries in international footballers.Methods: Over a 4-year period, injuries from England international footballers at training camps or matches were recorded, alongside self-reported information on menstrual cycle characteristics at the point of injury. Injuries in eumenorrheic players were categorized into early follicular, late follicular, or luteal phase. Frequencies were also compared between injuries recorded during the typical cycle and those that occurred after the cycle would be expected to have finished. Injury incidence rates (per 1,000 person days) and injury incidence rate ratios were calculated for each phase for all injuries and injuries stratified by type.Results: One hundred fifty-six injuries from 113 players were eligible for analysis. Injury incidence rates per 1,000 person-days were 31.9 in the follicular, 46.8 in the late follicular, and 35.4 in the luteal phase, resulting in injury incidence rate ratios of 1.47 (Late follicular:Follicular), 1.11 (Luteal:Follicular), and 0.76 (Luteal:Late follicular). Injury incident rate ratios showed that muscle and tendon injury rates were 88% greater in the late follicular phase compared to the follicular phase, with muscle rupture/tear/strain/cramps and tendon injuries/ruptures occurring over twice as often during the late follicular phase compared to other phases 20% of injuries were reported as occurring when athletes were “overdue” menses.Conclusion: Muscle and tendon injuries occurred almost twice as often in the late follicular phase compared to the early follicular or luteal phase. Injury risk may be elevated in typically eumenorrheic women in the days after their next menstruation was expected to start.

Variation in the timing of ovulation relative to other follicular phase events following natural and induced luteal regression in dairy cows

1999 ◽  
Vol 1999 ◽  
pp. 63-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.E. Mann ◽  
G.S. Starbuck ◽  
M. Benboulaid ◽  
A.R. Peters ◽  
G.E. Lamming
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Cows ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Ultrasound Scanning ◽  
Luteal Regression ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Precise Timing ◽  
Breeding Programmes ◽  
Prostaglandin F

Insemination at an inappropriate time is one of many constraints to good fertility in dairy cows. As a result, many studies have attempted to improve the synchrony of oestrus in controlled breeding programmes. However, the success of insemination depends not merely on the detection of oestrus, but also on the timing of ovulation relative to insemination. Thus a better understanding of the factors associated with the precise timing of behavioural oestrus and ovulation is required. In this study the time of ovulation has been determined, by ultrasound scanning, in relation to a variety of follicular phase events in dairy cows following both natural luteolysis and luteolysis induced by treatment with a prostaglandin F2a analogue. The objectives were firstly to determine whether differences existed in the timing of follicular phase events following natural and induced luteal regression and secondly to determine the degree of variation that exists between the timing of ovulation and the timing of other follicular phase events.

Source of ovarian inhibin secretion during the oestrous cycle of the sheep

1989 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. Mann ◽  
A. S. McNeilly ◽  
D. T. Baird
Keyword(s):  
Corpus Luteum ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Secretion Rate ◽  
Antral Follicles ◽  
Luteal Tissue

ABSTRACT The source of inhibin secretion by the ovary in the sheep at different stages of the oestrous cycle was investigated by in-vivo cannulation of the ovarian veins. Twenty-four Scottish Blackface ewes were allocated to four groups of six ewes, i.e. those operated on during the luteal phase (day 10), and those operated on during the follicular phase 24–30, 36 and 60 h following an injection of 125 μg cloprostenol on day 10 of the luteal phase. Samples of jugular and timed ovarian venous blood were collected under anaesthesia before and after enucleation of the corpus luteum. Ovaries were then removed and follicles dissected out. Following injection of cloprostenol, luteal regression occurred as indicated by a fall in the secretion of progesterone. The concentration of inhibin in jugular venous plasma and its ovarian secretion rate were similar at all stages of the follicular phase and during the luteal phase. In contrast, the secretion rate of oestradiol rose from 2·68 ±0·73 pmol/min during the luteal phase to 8·70± 2·24 pmol/min 24 h after injection of cloprostenol (P<0·05). Following enucleation of the corpus luteum the secretion rate of progesterone fell from 809 ± 270 pmol/min to 86 ± 30 pmol/min (P<0·001). There was also a smaller, artifactual fall in the secretion rate of oestradiol following enucleation of the corpus luteum, which was of similar size to a fall seen in the secretion rate of inhibin. This resulted in a significant (P<0·001) fall in the ratio of progesterone to inhibin, while the oestradiol to inhibin ratio remained unchanged. The secretion rate of inhibin from ovaries containing luteal tissue was similar to that from the contralateral side without luteal tissue (1·41±0·30 compared with 1·32±0·30 ng/min), while ovaries with large antral follicles secreted significantly (P< 0·001) more inhibin than those with no follicles ≥3 mm (2·28 ± 0·36 compared with 0·25 ±0·06 ng/min). From these results we conclude that, in the sheep, large antral follicles are responsible for most, if not all, the secretion of inhibin by the ovary at all stages of the oestrous cycle, and that the corpus luteum secretes little or no immunoactive or bioactive inhibin. Due to the fact that, unlike inhibin, the secretion rate of oestradiol rises during the follicular phase of the cycle, when the concentration of FSH is suppressed, it seems likely that oestradiol rather than inhibin is the major ovarian factor modulating the change in FSH secretion seen at this stage of the oestrous cycle. Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 123, 181–188

Episodic secretion of inhibin into the ovarian vein during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle in the ewe

1989 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. McNeilly ◽  
D. T. Baird
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Concentration ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Ovarian Vein ◽  
Preovulatory Follicle ◽  
Luteal Regression ◽  
Merino Sheep

ABSTRACT Changes in the plasma concentration of inhibin were measured by radioimmunoassay in ovarian venous blood collected at 10-min intervals for 5-h periods between 16 and 21 h and 40 and 45 h after cloprostenol-induced luteal regression in six Finn–Merino sheep. Episodes of inhibin secretion occurred with an interpulse interval of 66 ± 5 min in both stages of the follicular phase. These changes in inhibin were unrelated to pulses of LH or oestradiol. There was no relationship with plasma concentrations of FSH, which did not change in a pulsatile manner. These results suggest that the release of inhibin by the preovulatory follicle(s) occurs in a pulsatile manner and is under local control by unknown factors. Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 122, 287–292

Induction of transient functional luteolysis in cyclic sheep by a 3 β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitor

1984 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Jenkin ◽  
R. T. Gemmell ◽  
G. D. Thorburn
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Competitive Inhibition ◽  
Ovarian Tissue ◽  
Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Morphological Examination ◽  
Plasma Progesterone ◽  
Luteal Regression ◽  
Luteal Function ◽  
Prostaglandin F

ABSTRACT The mechanism by which prostaglandin F2α terminates luteal function in the sheep is unclear even though it is used extensively in animal husbandry. At the time of luteal regression, a decrease in 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD) activity is apparent in the corpus luteum, but it is not known whether the decrease in enzyme activity is the primary cause of structural luteolysis. The effect of trilostane, a 3β-HSD inhibitor, on luteal function and morphology has therefore been investigated. Intravenous injection of trilostane in the mid-luteal phase of the oestrous cycle caused a decrease in ovarian tissue progesterone content. A transient decrease in peripheral and utero-ovarian vein plasma progesterone was observed but there was no significant effect on the length of the luteal phase of the cycle. There was no significant change in plasma 13,14-dihydro-15-oxo-prostaglandin F2α during the period when plasma progesterone was depressed. Morphological examination of the corpora lutea revealed a decrease in the concentration of electron-dense granules without any other features of impending luteal regression. When plasma progesterone was reduced for more than 10 h by two injections of trilostane 4 h apart, there was again no subsequent effect on the length of the oestrous cycle or on the return to oestrus. Plasma progesterone returned to preinjection levels within 24 h of injection. This evidence suggests that competitive inhibition of 3β-HSD activity, per se, is ineffective in bringing about structural luteolysis. J. Endocr. (1984) 100, 61–66

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document