scholarly journals Analysis of a Urinary Biomarker Panel for Incident Kidney Disease and Clinical Outcomes

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1880-1888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conall M. O’Seaghdha ◽  
Shih-Jen Hwang ◽  
Martin G. Larson ◽  
James B. Meigs ◽  
Ramachandran S. Vasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Urinary Biomarker ◽  
Biomarker Panel

scholarly journals Analysis of a Urinary Biomarker Panel for Clinical Outcomes Assessment in Cirrhosis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0128145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Ariza ◽  
Elsa Solà ◽  
Chiara Elia ◽  
Rogelio Barreto ◽  
Rebeca Moreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Outcomes Assessment ◽  
Urinary Biomarker ◽  
Biomarker Panel ◽  
Clinical Outcomes Assessment

scholarly journals Analysis of a Urinary Biomarker Panel for Obstructive Nephropathy and Clinical Outcomes

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e112865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Xie ◽  
Wei Xue ◽  
Xinghua Shao ◽  
Xiajing Che ◽  
Weijia Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Obstructive Nephropathy ◽  
Urinary Biomarker ◽  
Biomarker Panel

scholarly journals Plasma natriuretic peptide level is an independent determinant of major clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients without heart failure: the Fushimi AF Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Hamatani ◽  
M Iguchi ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
K Ishigami ◽  
S Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of death, stroke/systemic embolism and heart failure (HF). Plasma natriuretic peptide (NP) level is an important prognostic marker in HF patients. However, little is known regarding the prognostic significance of plasma NP level in AF patients without HF. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between plasma NP level and clinical outcomes such as all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization during follow-up period in AF patients without HF. Methods The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in our city. The inclusion criterion of the registry is the documentation of AF at 12-lead electrocardiogram or Holter monitoring at any time, and there are no exclusion criteria. We started to enroll patients from March 2011, and follow-up data were available for 4,466 patients by the end of November 2019. From the registry, we excluded 1,220 patients without a pre-existing HF (defined as having one of the following; prior hospitalization for HF, New York Heart Association class ≥2, or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%). Among 3,246 AF patients without HF, we investigated 1,189 patients with the data of plasma BNP (n=401) or N-terminal pro-BNP (n=788) level at the enrollment. We divided the patients according to the quartile of each plasma BNP or NT-pro BNP level and compared the backgrounds and outcomes between these 4 groups stratified by plasma NP level. Results Of 1,189 patients, the mean age was 72.1±10.2 years, 454 (38%) were female and 684 (58%) were paroxysmal AF. The mean CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc score were 1.6±1.1 and 2.9±1.5, respectively. Oral anticoagulants were prescribed in 671 (56%) at baseline. The median (interquartile range) BNP and N-terminal pro-BNP level were 84 (38, 176) and 500 (155, 984) pg/ml, respectively. Patients with high plasma NP level were older, and demonstrated lower prevalence of paroxysmal AF, higher CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease and oral anticoagulants prescription (all P<0.01). A total of 165 all-cause death, 114 stroke/systemic embolism and 103 HF hospitalization occurred during the median follow-up period of 5.0 years. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that higher plasma NP level was significantly associated with the incidences of all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization in AF patients without HF (Figure 1A). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that plasma NP level could stratify the risk of clinical outcomes even after adjustment by type of AF, CHA2DS2-VASc score, chronic kidney disease and oral anticoagulant prescription (Figure 1B). Conclusion Plasma NP level is a significant prognostic marker for all-cause death, stroke/systemic embolism and HF hospitalization in AF patients without HF, suggesting the importance of measuring plasma NP level in AF patients even without HF. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals ASSOCIATION OF BMI ON WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY DISEASE AND ADVANCED CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: INSIGHTS FROM THE ISCHEMIA-CKD TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Evgeny Kretov ◽  
Zhen Huang ◽  
Mandeep Sidhu ◽  
Sean O'Brien ◽  
Jerome Fleg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Disease ◽  
Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

scholarly journals Perspectives and experiences of patients and healthcare professionals with geriatric assessment in chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlijn G. N. Voorend ◽  
Noeleen C. Berkhout-Byrne ◽  
Yvette Meuleman ◽  
Simon P. Mooijaart ◽  
Willem Jan W. Bos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Treatment Team ◽  
Dutch Hospital ◽  
Additional Support

Abstract Background Older patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) often live with unidentified frailty and multimorbidity. Despite guideline recommendations, geriatric assessment is not part of standard clinical care, resulting in a missed opportunity to enhance (clinical) outcomes including quality of life in these patients. To develop routine geriatric assessment programs for patients approaching ESKD, it is crucial to understand patients’ and professionals’ experiences with and perspectives about the benefits, facilitators and barriers for geriatric assessment. Methods In this qualitative study, semi-structured focus group discussions were conducted with ESKD patients, caregivers and professionals. Participants were purposively sampled from three Dutch hospital-based study- and routine care initiatives involving geriatric assessment for (pre-)ESKD care. Transcripts were analysed inductively using thematic analysis. Results In six focus-groups, participants (n = 47) demonstrated four major themes: (1) Perceived characteristics of the older (pre)ESKD patient group. Patients and professionals recognized increased vulnerability and (cognitive) comorbidity, which is often unrelated to calendar age. Both believed that often patients are in need of additional support in various geriatric domains. (2) Experiences with geriatric assessment. Patients regarded the content and the time spent on the geriatric assessment predominantly positive. Professionals emphasized that assessment creates awareness among the whole treatment team for cognitive and social problems, shifting the focus from mainly somatic to multidimensional problems. Outcomes of geriatric assessment were observed to enhance a dialogue on suitability of treatment options, (re)adjust treatment and provide/seek additional (social) support. (3) Barriers and facilitators for implementation of geriatric assessment in routine care. Discussed barriers included lack of communication about goals and interpretation of geriatric assessment, burden for patients, illiteracy, and organizational aspects. Major facilitators are good multidisciplinary cooperation, involvement of geriatrics and multidisciplinary team meetings. (4) Desired characteristics of a suitable geriatric assessment concerned the scope and use of tests and timing of assessment. Conclusions Patients and professionals were positive about using geriatric assessment in routine nephrology care. Implementation seems achievable, once barriers are overcome and facilitators are endorsed. Geriatric assessment in routine care appears promising to improve (clinical) outcomes in patients approaching ESKD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document