scholarly journals The Effects of Hearing Handicaps and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living on Hearing-Handicap-Related Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-351
Author(s):  
Hayoung Park ◽  
Oksoo Kim

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate hearing handicaps, instrumental activities of daily living, and hearing-handicap-related quality of life among community-dwelling older adults and identify factors that influence hearing-handicap-related quality of life.Methods: A total of 129 older adults aged 65 and over participated in the study, and data collection was conducted from December 20th, 2020 to March 20th, 2021. Descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlations, and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis.Results: Self-reported hearing handicaps positively associated with instrumental activities of daily living (r=.82, p<.001), and negatively associated with hearing-handicap-related quality of life (r=-.80, p<.001). Instrumental activities of daily living negatively associated with hearing-handicap-related quality of life (r=-.71, p<.001). Hearing handicaps influenced hearing-handicap-related quality of life (β=-.70, p<.001). A regression model explained 66% of the variance in hearing-handicap-related quality of life.Conclusion: Hearing handicaps affect hearing-handicap-related quality of life of older adults living in the community. Therefore, nursing interventions to prevent hearing handicaps are required to improve hearing-handicap-related quality of life of older adults.

Drugs & Aging ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 785-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Cossette ◽  
Maimouna Bagna ◽  
Modou Sene ◽  
Caroline Sirois ◽  
Gabrielle P. Lefebvre ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evi Petersen ◽  
Gerhard Schoen ◽  
Gunnar Liedtke ◽  
Astrid Zech

Purpose Urban green space (UGS) shows to be a sustainable resource stimulating physical activity, health and quality of life in the general population. With regard to an aging European population, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between UGS, physical activity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in community-dwelling older adults. Design/methodology/approach Cross-sectional survey data were provided by a sample from Hamburg (Germany), consisting of 272 adults aged⩾65 years. Respondents answered questions regarding HRQoL (Short Form 12), physical activity (German-PAQ-50+) and exposure to UGS. The authors applied a linear regression to analyse the relationship between weekly duration of exposure to UGS and physical activity. While controlling for confounding factors, the authors used a multivariate linear regression model to detect effects on HRQoL. Findings A significant effect (adjusted R2: 4.3 per cent; p-value⩽0.001) was found for weekly duration of exposure to UGS and weekly physical activity. Multiple linear regression showed significant positive effects of weekly duration of exposure to UGS (p=0.010) and weekly time of physical activity (p=0.017) on HRQoL. Age, sex and feeling of satisfaction were identified as relevant confounding factors. Research limitations/implications Future research should continue to explore the indicators that mediate an increase of physical activity and HRQoL in the heterogeneous age band of older adults. Practical implications Findings suggest that community-dwelling older adults are likely to benefit from higher amounts of time in UGS since it is positively associated with both physical activity and HRQoL. Therefore, urban planners should explicitly consider the demands of community-dwelling older adults towards UGS. Originality/value This study is one of the first to examine the relationship between UGS, physical activity and HRQoL in older adults.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 117 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Foley ◽  
S. Hillier ◽  
R. Barnard

Pre and post testing were conducted on community-dwelling older adults referred to a geriatric day rehabilitation centre (DRC). Consecutive DRC clients were screened for inclusion over a 16-month period and were eligible if: aged 60+ years; cognitively intact; and reason for referral involved spinal or lower limb musculoskeletal impairment, disability or surgery, and/or reduced functional mobility or falls. Clients were excluded if they had a neurological disorder, or did not complete the program. Outcome measures included: lower limb strength; balance; mobility; self-reported pain; activities of daily living; and quality of life. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics and analysed using paired t-tests. Of the 137 participants recruited, 110 were female and the mean age was 79.5 ± 7.3 years. In total, 106 participants completed the DRC program and were assessed at baseline and re-assessed at discharge. The mean length of stay was 12.4 ± 2.9 weeks, with 21.4 ± 5.4 attendances. From baseline to discharge, statistically significant differences were found for all objective measures of physical functioning, balance, and for all lower limb strength tests (P < 0.0001). Glasgow Pain Questionnaire scores demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all five domains of the scale (P < 0.0001). The Barthel Index and Multi-dimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire both showed a statistically significant improvement in the level of independence in activities of daily living (ADL) (P < 0.05). The Assessment of Quality of Life Questionnaire showed a statistically significant improvement (P = 0.027). The Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale also showed a statistically significant improvement over DRC attendance (P = 0.005). The Falls Efficacy Scale showed a positive change, but the improvement was not statistically significant (P = 0.80). The study’s results indicate that community-dwelling older adults with physical disabilities and multiple comorbidities who attended the interdisciplinary geriatric DRC, significantly improved their lower limb strength, balance and physical function, and also showed significant decreases in self-reported pain, and improvements in independence in ADL and quality of life. Given the limitations of the current study, further research, in the form of high quality studies with larger sample sizes that involve direct comparisons with other forms of care or against a control group, is needed to determine whether day rehabilitation centre programs provide the optimum mode of rehabilitation for this population in the most cost effective manner.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J. McDougall ◽  
Areum Han ◽  
Vincent S. Staggs ◽  
David K. Johnson ◽  
Joan M. McDowd

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 118-118
Author(s):  
Darryl Alan Outlaw ◽  
Chen Dai ◽  
Mustafa Al-Obaidi ◽  
Smith Giri ◽  
Smita Bhatia ◽  
...  

118 Background: The majority of new cancer diagnoses occur in adults greater than 65 years of age. Polypharmacy is a common and potentially devastating problem amongst older adults; however, its prevalence and impact in older adults with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy is poorly understood. Our objective was to examine the prevalence of polypharmacy and its association with functional status impairments, frailty, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in older adults with GI malignancy. Methods: The Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) registry at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) is an ongoing prospective cohort study that uses a brief geriatric assessment (CARE survey) in older adults with cancer. We evaluated older adults diagnosed with GI malignancy prior to starting cancer therapy. Our primary outcomes of interest were functional status impairments, including dependence in activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), frailty (as defined by a frailty index derived using the principles of deficit accumulation), and HRQoL (assessed via PROMIS 10 global that includes physical and mental scores). Patients were dichotomized into those taking ≥9 vs. < 9 medications. Multivariable analyses examined associations between polypharmacy and the above-listed outcomes, adjusted for age, sex, race, cancer type, cancer stage, and comorbidities. Results: Overall, 357 patients met eligibility criteria; mean age: 70.1 years; primary diagnoses: colorectal (33.6%), pancreatic (24.6%), hepatobiliary (16.2%), gastroesophageal (10.9%), other (14.6%). Patients reported taking a mean of 6.2 medications: 27.7% with 0-3 medications, 48.2% with 4-8 medications, and 24.1% with ≥ 9 medications. Patients taking ≥ 9 medications were more likely to report limitations in ADL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.29, 95% CI 1.72-6.29) and IADL (aOR 2.86, 95% CI 1.59-5.14). Polypharmacy was also associated with frailty (aOR 3.06, 95% CI 1.73-5.41) and lower physical (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.70-4.69) and mental (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.03-2.91) HRQoL. Conclusions: Independent of comorbid conditions, polypharmacy was associated with functional status limitations, frailty, and reduced HRQoL in older adults with GI malignancy. Further study of specific medications and interactions is warranted in order to reduce the negative consequences of polypharmacy in this growing and vulnerable population.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1735-1742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Augusta Bessa Rebelo ◽  
Evangeline Maria Cardoso ◽  
Peter G. Robinson ◽  
Mario Vianna Vettore

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document