scholarly journals Nasotracheal intubation for airway management during anesthesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-247
Author(s):  
Dong Ho Park ◽  
Chia An Lee ◽  
Chang Young Jeong ◽  
Hong-Seuk Yang

Nasotracheal intubation is used as a basic method for airway management, along with orotracheal intubation under anesthesia and intensive care. It has become an effective alternative method to orotracheal intubation with increased benefits of offering better mobility and surgical field in oral and maxillofacial surgery and possibly in trauma and critically ill patients. Nasotracheal intubation is performed through a relatively narrow nasal cavity; therefore, additional precautions are needed. Accordingly, nasotracheal intubation methods have evolved over the years with accumulated clinical experience and improved instruments to facilitate safe intubation with reduced complications. Therefore, in this review article, we summarize the basic anatomy of the nasal airways to clarify the precautions, delineate the history and development of various methods and instruments, and describe the indications, contraindications, complications, and preventive methods of nasotracheal intubation.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaxi Wang ◽  
Hua Li ◽  
Xuanping Huang ◽  
Nuo Zhou

Abstract Background: Although anesthesia can contribute to olfactory dysfunction, it is a rare complication after oral and maxillofacial surgery by general anesthesia.Cases presentation: In this study, we introduced 3 cases of patient suffering from anosmia (complete loss of smell), after oral and maxillofacial surgery by general anesthesia. We also investigated possible etiologies of anosmia. Conclusions: There are some evidences that anosmia is caused by nasotracheal intubation, which may cause OM injury and/or swing of the nasal septum in patients with nasal septum deviation. Olfactory dysfunction via general anesthetic drugs, however, may have a different etiology.


2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-119
Author(s):  
P Chohan ◽  
R Elledge ◽  
MK Virdi ◽  
GM Walton

Surgical tracheostomy is a commonly provided service by surgical teams for patients in intensive care where percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is contraindicated. A number of factors may interfere with its provision on shared emergency operating lists, potentially prolonging the stay in intensive care. We undertook a two-part project to examine the factors that might delay provision of surgical tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. The first part was a prospective audit of practice within the University Hospital Coventry. This was followed by a telephone survey of oral and maxillofacial surgery units throughout the UK. In the intensive care unit at University Hospital Coventry, of 39 referrals, 21 (53.8%) were delayed beyond 24 hours. There was a mean (standard deviation) time to delay of 2.2 days (0.9 days) and the most common cause of delay was surgeon decision, accounting for 13 (61.9%) delays. From a telephone survey of 140 units nationwide, 40 (28.4%) were regularly involved in the provision of surgical tracheostomies for intensive care and 17 (42.5%) experienced delays beyond 24 hours, owing to a combination of theatre availability (76.5%) and surgeon availability (47.1%). There is case for having a dedicated tracheostomy team and provisional theatre slot to optimise patient outcomes and reduce delays. We aim to implement such a move within our unit and audit the outcomes prospectively following this change.


2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-113
Author(s):  
Vernon H. Vivian ◽  
Dip Anaes ◽  
Tyson L. Pardon ◽  
Andre A. J. Van Zundert

Nasotracheal intubation remains an underused but invaluable technique for securely managing the airway during oral and maxillofacial surgery. In this article, we present a modified clinical technique that allows for the potential introduction into clinical practice of 2 new airway devices: a nasal laryngeal mask airway and an interchangeable oral/nasal endotracheal tube. We hypothesize that with the use of proper techniques, these devices can add new and safer alternatives for securing an airway by the nasal route. The advantage of this novel technique is that the airway is secured by the oral route prior to performing a modified retrograde nasal intubation, eliminating the danger of profuse epistaxis precipitating a “cannot intubate, cannot ventilate” scenario. In addition, the design and materials used in the components of the devices may minimize trauma. The authors aim to inform clinicians about the indications, physical characteristics, and insertion/removal techniques related to these new devices.


2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-240
Author(s):  
Alexandru Rotaru ◽  
Horatiu Rotaru

Professor Cornel Tiberiu Opris was the founder and Chair of the Clinic and University Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Cluj, after the Education Reform of 1948. The article illustrates how the founder of these institutions led a valiant struggle for obtaining and arranging a location for the newly established Faculty of Dentistry, within the Institute of Medicine and Pharmacy. Professor Cornel Tiberiu Opriş established himself as the most prodigious researcher at the Faculty for over a quarter-century, until his retirement, introducing his original conception in the therapeutic and surgical field. He created in Cluj-Napoca a specialist medical school by imposing national prestige for the institution that he led.


Author(s):  
Kamran Khan ◽  
Jawaria Bibi ◽  
Muhammad Umar Qayyum

Introduction: In maxillofacial trauma the preferred intubation method for general anesthesia is nasotracheal intubation in most of the trauma centers. We conducted a retrospective study to review the utility of this method of intubation in maxillofacial trauma patients. We aimed to review the intra-operative and postoperative concerns and complications for nasotracheal intubation and effectiveness of this method of intubation in maxillofacial trauma patient. Methodology: This study included 56 patients of maxillofacial trauma, who were treated in our centre of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Islamic International Dental Hospital, Islamabad in the period of two years, 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2017. Results: The study showed that nasal intubation is relatively more effective in isolated mandibular trauma patients. But there are difficulties regarding intubation in maxillary fractures and pan-facial trauma patients. Conclusion: Although nasotracheal method of intubation is difficult to attain in some cases, but still it is an effective method of intubation for majority of the maxillofacial trauma cases with very low rate of complications. Received: 30 Sep 2018Reviewed: 16 Nov 2018Accepted: 17 Nov 2018 Citation: Khan K, Bibi J, Qayyum MU. Intubation concerns in maxillofacial trauma patients Anaesth Pain & Intensive Care 2018;22 Suppl 1:S109-S112


2016 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
Muralee Mohan C. ◽  
Gopinath Thilak P. S. ◽  
Pratiksha Shetty ◽  
Ashish J. Rai ◽  
Saurabh M. Gohil

AbstractSoft tissue injuries, whether isolated or in combination with other injuries, are among the most common traumatic craniofacial injuries encountered by emergency department personnel and maxillofacial surgeons. Despite this high incidence, there are very few studies that systematically investigate the management of these injuries and therefore, there is no widely accepted classification scheme or treatment algorithms to guide evaluation and treatment. As a result, most critical management decisions are left exclusively to the discretion of the treating surgeon with limited prospective or retrospective data, beyond personal experience, available to guide treatment. This may lead to many disparate approaches to both short-term and longterm management. In this review article, we give a brief account of management of facial abrasions, including tetanus prophylaxis, pain assessment, cleaning, definitive closure and dressing of facial abrasions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document