scholarly journals A tumormarker-kutatás rövid története. A PSA, mint legismertebb urológiai tumormarker felfedezésének története

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 538-546
Author(s):  
Melinda Váradi
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Malignant Disease ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Modern Medicine ◽  
Tumour Markers ◽  
Oncofetal Antigens ◽  
The Us ◽  
The 1960S

There are a number of tumour markers available today enabling the early detection of malignancies thus saving the lives of many thousands of people worldwide. By definition, tumour markers are substances in tissues, blood, bone marrow or other body fluids that appear in cancer patients’ samples or are present at significantly elevated levels compared to normal conditions. The first marker of malignant disease in modern medicine was identified in 1846 by the English physician-chemist Henry Bence-Jones. Yet, at that time, of course, he was not aware that the protein (named as Bence-Jones) he discovered, was a pathogenic indicator of multiple myeloma. The classic era of tumour markers started in the 1960s with the discovery of two leading oncofetal antigens, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). AFP was published in 1944 by Swedish scientist Kai O. Pedersen, while the discovery of CEA is associated with two Canadian physicians, Phil Gold and Samuel O. Freedman. One of the most widely known tumour markers indicating prostate cancer is the prostate-specific antigen or PSA. The discovery of PSA as a clinically useful marker of prostate cancer and its translation into clinical practice can be attributed to Ming C. Wang, who described the molecule in 1979. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PSA in 1986 as a molecule for monitoring the disease, and in 1994 it licenced the measuring of PSA levels as a screening test, thus facilitating the early detection of prostate cancer and enabling more effective treatment.

Complexed prostate-specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer in men with serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 2 to 4 nanograms per milliliter

Urology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Horninger ◽  
Carol D Cheli ◽  
Richard J Babaian ◽  
Herbert A Fritsche ◽  
Herbert Lepor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Serum Prostate Specific Antigen

scholarly journals Early detection of prostate cancer local recurrence by urinary prostate-specific antigen

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Bolduc ◽  
Brant A. Inman ◽  
Louis Lacombe ◽  
Yves Fradet ◽  
Roland R. Tremblay
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Laboratory Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prostatectomie Radicale ◽  
Psa Recurrence ◽  
Patients Atteints De Cancer

Purpose: We assessed the role of urinary prostate-specific antigen(uPSA) in the follow-up of prostate cancer after retropubic radicalprostatectomy (RRP) for the early detection of local recurrences.Methods: We recruited 50 patients previously treated for prostatecancer with RRP and who had not experienced a prostatespecificantigen (PSA) recurrence within their first postoperativeyear into a cross-sectional laboratory assessment and prospective6-year longitudinal follow-up study. We defined biochemicalfailure as a serum PSA (sPSA) of 0.3 μg/L or greater. Patientsprovided blood samples and a 50-mL sample of first-voided urine.We performed Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher exact tests for statisticalanalysis.Results: The median sPSA was 0.13 μg/L. The median uPSA was0.8 μg/L, and was not significantly different when comparingGleason scores or pathological stages. Of the 50 patients, 27 initiallyhad a nondetectable sPSA but a detectable uPSA, and11 patients experienced sPSA failure after 6 years. Six patients haddetectable sPSA and uPSA initially. Fifteen patients were negativefor both sPSA and uPSA, and 13 remained sPSA-free after 6 years.The odds ratio (OR) of having sPSA failure given a positive uPSAtest was 4.5 if sPSA was undetectable, but was reduced to 2.6 ifsPSA was detectable. The pooled Mantel–Haenszel OR of 4.2 suggestedthat a detectable uPSA quadrupled the risk of recurrence,independent of whether sPSA was elevated or not. The sensitivityof uPSA for detecting future sPSA recurrences was 81% andspecificity was 45%.Conclusion: Urinary PSA could contribute to an early detection oflocal recurrences of prostate cancer after a radical prostatectomy.Objectif : Nous avons évalué le rôle de l’antigène prostatiquespécifique (APS) urinaire dans le suivi du cancer de la prostateaprès prostatectomie radicale rétropubienne (PRR) pour le dépistageprécoce de récidives locales.Méthodes : Cinquante patients atteints de cancer de la prostatetraités par PRR et n’ayant présenté aucune récidive avec anomaliede l’APS dans l’année suivant l’intervention chirurgicale ontété inscrits à une étude transversale par épreuves de laboratoireavec suivi longitudinal prospectif sur 6 ans. L’échec sur le planbiochimique était défini comme un taux d’APS sérique de 0,3 μg/Lou plus. Les patients devaient fournir des échantillons de sanget un échantillon d’urine du matin de 50 mL. Les analyses statistiquesreposaient sur le test de Wilcoxon et la méthode exactede Fisher.Résultats : La valeur médiane de l’APS sérique était de 0,13 μg/L.La valeur médiane de l’APS urinaire était de 0,8 μg/L; la différenceétait non significative quand on tenait compte des scores deGleason ou des stades pathologiques. Sur les 50 patients,27 présentaient des taux d’APS sérique non décelables au début,mais des taux d’APS urinaire décelables; 11 patients ont présentéun échec quant aux taux d’APS sérique après 6 ans. Six patientsavaient des taux d’APS sérique et urinaire décelables au départ.Quinze patients n’avaient aucun taux décelable d’APS sérique ouurinaire, et aucun APS sérique n’était toujours décelable chez13 patients après 6 ans. Le rapport de risque d’un échec quantaux taux d’APS sérique après détection d’APS urinaire est de 4,5en l’absence d’un taux d’APS sérique décelable, mais diminueà 2,6 en présence d’un taux d’APS sérique décelable. Le rapportde risque cumulé de 4,21 calculé par la méthode deMantel–Haenszel porte à croire que des taux d’APS urinaire décelablesquadruplent le risque de présenter une récidive, queles taux sériques soient élevés ou non. La sensibilité du test dedépistage de l’APS urinaire pour la détection des récidives avecanomalie des taux sériques était de 81 %, et la spécificité, de 45 %.Conclusion : Le taux d’APS urinaire peut contribuer à un dépistageprécoce des récidives locales après une prostatectomie radicale.

Early Detection of Residual Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy by an Ultrasensitive Assay for Prostate Specific Antigen

1993 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Stamey ◽  
Howard C.B. Graves ◽  
Nancy Wehner ◽  
Michelle Ferrari ◽  
Fuad S. Freiha
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Ultrasensitive Assay

Comparing Two Modalities of Screening for Prostate Cancer: Digital Rectal Examination + Transrectal Ultrasonography Vs. Prostate-Specific Antigen

1995 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Ciatto ◽  
Rita Bonardi ◽  
Antonia Mazzotta ◽  
Claudio Lombardi ◽  
Roberto Santoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasonography ◽  
Attendance Rate ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Biopsy Rate

Aims and background To evaluate the performance and feasibility of screening for prostate cancer by comparing screening modalities. Methods Prospective study of two comparable cohorts of healthy resident males aged 60 to 75 years. Screening attenders in the two invited cohorts were screened either by digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), or by serum prostate-specific antigen determination (PSA: cutoff 4 ng/ml). Attendance and biopsy rates, predictive values, prevalence of screen-detected cancers, as well as screening costs were determined, and the efficiency of the two screening modalities was compared. Results 1425 subjects were screened by DRE + TRUS. Attendance rate was 33.7%, the biopsy rate was 2.7%, and the prevalence of detected cancers was 1.82%. A total of 1315 subjects was screened by PSA. Attendance rate was 66.9%, the biopsy rate was 2.8%, and the prevalence of detected cancers was 1.67%. Screen-detected cancer stage was more favorable than observed in clinical practice, and early detection was evident, with the prevalence/incidence ratio higher than 10:1 in both programs. The cost per subject screened was about 34,000 Lire for DRE + TRSU and about 30,000 Lire for PSA program. Conclusions The study confirms that early detection of prostate cancer is possible and that screening is practically feasible. Both screening modalities achieved comparable results as regards early detection, but screening by PSA had a higher compliance and lower costs. PSA seems the ideal test to be used in prospective controlled studies aimed at demonstrating screening efficacy.

scholarly journals Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity Useful in Early Detection of Prostate Cancer? A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence

2007 ◽  
Vol 99 (20) ◽  
pp. 1510-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Etzioni ◽  
D. P. Ankerst ◽  
N. S. Weiss ◽  
L. Y. T. Inoue ◽  
I. M. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Specific Antigen

Discordant prostate specific antigen test results despite WHO assay standardization

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Boegemann ◽  
Christian Arsov ◽  
Boris Hadaschik ◽  
Kathleen Herkommer ◽  
Florian Imkamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Test ◽  
Free Psa ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Cancer Early Detection ◽  
Total Psa

Introduction: Total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) are the most commonly used biomarkers for early detection of prostate cancer. Despite standardization efforts, many available PSA assays may still produce discordant results. In the present study, we compared four PSA assays calibrated to the WHO standards 96/670 and 96/668 for tPSA and fPSA, respectively. Methods: Within the scope of the Prostate Cancer Early Detection Study Based on a ‘‘Baseline’’ PSA Value in Young Men (PROBASE), we tested tPSA and fPSA in serum samples from 50 patients in the four different PROBASE sites using four WHO-calibrated assays from Roche (Elecsys, Cobas), Beckman-Coulter (Access-II) and Siemens (ADVIA Centaur). The comparison was performed using the Passing–Bablok regression method. Results: Compared to Access, the median tPSA levels for Centaur, Elecsys, and Cobas were +3%, +11%–20%, and +17%–23%, respectively, while for median fPSA levels the differences for Centaur, Elecsys, and Cobas were +49%, +29%–31%, and +22%, respectively. Discussion: Despite all investigated assays being WHO-calibrated, the Elecsys and Cobas tPSA assays produced considerably higher results than the Access and Centaur assays. Differences in fPSA-recovery between all investigated assays were even more pronounced. When applying the tPSA cutoff of 3.1 μg/L recommended for WHO-calibrated assays, the use of higher calibrated assays may lead to unnecessary prostate biopsies. Conversely, if the historical threshold of 4 μg/L is applied when using WHO-calibrated assays, it could lead to falsely omitted prostate biopsies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document