scholarly journals Pre-treatment Characteristics of Night Soil by Microbubble

Author(s):  
Ji-young Lim ◽  
Hyun-sik Kim ◽  
Soo-young Park ◽  
Jin-Han Kim
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sturla Fossum ◽  
John Kjøbli ◽  
May Britt Drugli ◽  
Bjørn Helge Handegård ◽  
Willy-Tore Mørch ◽  
...  

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore whether the changes in externalising behaviour for young aggressive children differ between two evidence-based parent training (PT) programmes after treatment. The treatment formats between these programmes differ, and the authors were particularly interested in whether this influenced the results for participants with co-occurring problems (child variables such as heightened levels of attention and internalising problems, and parental variables such as marital status and education) and the consequent additional risk of poorer treatment outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – A comparison of the individual treatment programme “Parent Management Training – Oregon model” (PMTO) and the group intervention programme “The Incredible Years” (IY) basic training sessions. Outcomes were explored in matched samples from two earlier Norwegian replication studies. The participants were matched on pre-treatment characteristics using a quasi-experimental mis-matching procedure. Findings – There were no significant differences between the two interventions in parent ratings of externalising behaviours and the lack of differing effects between the two treatments remained when the co-occurring risk factors were introduced into the analyses. Research limitations/implications – The participants were matched on pre-treatment characteristics using a quasi-experimental mis-matching procedure. Practical implications – A possible implication of these findings is that parents should be allowed to choose the treatment format of their preference. Further, individual PT may be more appropriate in rural settings with difficulties in forming group interventions. Social implications – Treatment effects did not differ between these two evidence-based interventions. Originality/value – To the best of the knowledge independent comparisons of two evidence-based PT interventions are not previously conducted.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2079-2079
Author(s):  
Asad Bashey ◽  
Oralia Loza ◽  
Bridget Medina ◽  
Katherine Keesee ◽  
Sue Corringham ◽  
...  

Abstract High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem-cell support (ASCS) is commonly used to treat patients with relapsed or high risk but chemosensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin’s Disease (HD). However, the optimum HDC regimen for these patients has not been defined. CEB or BEAM are among the most commonly used regimens, but they have not been compared in a randomized prospective study. At our center, CEB was the preferred regimen until Dec 2002 and BEAM has been the preferred regimen since. We compared pre-treatment characteristics and post HDC outcomes in 219 consecutive patients undergoing single HDC+ASCS for NHL/HD at our center who received BEAM or CEB as the HDC regimen. BEAM (BCNU 300mg/m2, Etoposide 800 mg/m2, Cytarabine 1600 mg/m2, Melphalan 140 mg/m2) was used in 110 patients and 109 patients received CEB (Cyclophosphamide 6000mg/m2, Etoposide 2000mg/m2, BCNU 600mg/m2). The groups were comparable with respect to pre-treatment characteristics: median age (48 vs 52), gender (M 66% vs 64%), diagnosis (NHL 75% vs 81%), number of prior regimens (median=2 for both),stage at diagnosis, disease status pre-HDC, and median CD34+ cell dose/kg infused (5.6 x 10e6 vs 5.4x 10e6), KPS (≥90 vs <90) (p=NS for all). Median follow-up from HDC was longer in CEB patients (841 days) than in BEAM patients (443 days). Estimated Kaplan-Meier probabilities of progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months and 24 months post HDC were 66.3%, 49.3% for BEAM and 60.2%, 55.1% for CEB (p=NS). The probability of overall survival (OS) at 12 and 24 months was 79.2%, 68.7% respectively for BEAM and 68.6%, 62.9% for CEB (p=NS). Transplant-related mortality (TRM) at 12m was 4.5% for BEAM versus 6.4% for CEB (p=NS). A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess the effect on OS, PFS and TRM of the following variables: regimen (BEAM vs CEB), diagnosis (HD vs NHL), age, gender, KPS, number of prior Rx regimens,stage at diagnosis, stage at treatment, disease status at transplant, CD34+ cell dose. On multivariate analysis, the following statisically significant associations were observed for the three outcome variables. PFS: age, gender, number of prior regimens,disease status at transplant. OS: age, gender, diagnosis, disease status at transplant. TRM: none. Females and patients with HD had better OS and PFS than males and NHL patients respectively. Conditioning regimen did not correlate with outcome for PFS, OS or TRM.The rate of severe mucositis (as defined by use of infusional opiate therapy during the first 25 days following HDC+ASCS) was significantly higher with CEB than BEAM (53% vs 47%, p=0.040). The rate of BCNU induced pnemonitis syndrome (as measured by prednisone use during first 30–120 days following HDC+ASCS and/or hospital readmission before day +120) was not significantly different between the two regimen groups. In summary, analysis of this sequential series of well matched patients receiving BEAM or CEB for HDC+ASCS for NHL or HD indicates that survival outcomes are comparable and BEAM is associated with a significant lower incidence of mucositis


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 232-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A Thompson ◽  
Paolo Strati ◽  
Michael Keating ◽  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Achieving MRD-negative remission after FCR therapy is an important predictor of longer progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS); however, with long-term follow-up, many MRD-negative patients subsequently relapse. The time course and predictive factors for relapse in initially MRD-negative patients have not been extensively characterized. Methods We prospectively analyzed 289 patients treated first-line with FCR for CLL at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 2008-15, to determine pre-treatment characteristics associated with post-treatment MRD negativity and the time course of relapse in MRD-negative patients. MRD analysis was performed in BM after course 3 (n=239) and at end of therapy (EOT) (n=231) using standardized 4-color flow cytometry (FLC). Ninety-five MRD-negative patients had 12-monthly serial MRD monitoring on blood. Results Pretreatment characteristics are shown below (N=289). For the total cohort, the only pre-treatment characteristic significantly associated with PFS was IGHV-unmutated (IGHV-UM) (HR 3.0 [1.6-5.5], p<0.001). Analyzed separately, among IGHV-mutated (IGHV-M) patients, only ZAP70 positivity (38/92 [41%]) by immunohistochemistry was significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR 3.2 [1.3-8.2], p=0.01); among IGHV-UM patients only B2M ≥4.0mg/L (64/146 [44%]) was significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.9 [1.2-3.0], p=0.005). Overall response rate was 96%. 46/239 patients (19%) after 3 courses and 120/231 (51%) at EOT achieved MRD negativity in BM. The following pre-treatment characteristics were significantly associated in univariableanalysis with achieving MRD-negativity at EOT in all patients: negative FISH (OR 3.1 [1.3-7.0], p=0.01), trisomy 12 (OR 2.7 [1.1-6.3], p=0.03, IGHV-M [OR 3.2 (1.8-5.9), p<0.001], β2-microglobulin <4.0mg/L [OR 1.85 (1.1-3.1), p=0.02] and ZAP70 negativity [OR 1.8 (1.03-3.2), p=0.04]. On multivariable analysis, only IGHV-M was significantly associated with MRD-negativity [OR 3.7 (1.7-8.2), p=0.001]. There were trends toward association between negative FISH [OR 5.4 (0.9-31.8), p=0.07] and trisomy 12 [OR 4.9 (0.8-29.8), p=0.08] with MRD-negativity. MRD negativity at EOT correlated with PFS, independent of IWCLL response category, and correlated with PFS in both IGHV-M and IGHV-UM patients (Figure A). In IGHV-M patients who were MRD-negative at EOT, there was a trend toward superior PFS if MRD-negativity was attained after 3 courses of FCR, even though 11/22 patients who were MRD-negative after 3 courses received no further therapy and only 3/22 received 6 courses (Figure B). Re-emergence of MRD in blood was detected in 45/95 MRD negative patients, at a median of 49 months post- treatment; this appeared less frequent in IGHV-M patients (Figure C). Re-emergence of MRD preceded clinical relapse by a median of 25 months. There were no significant differences in time-to-subsequent clinical relapse after re-emergence of MRD according to mutation status (Figure D). Among IGHV-M patients who were MRD-negative after 3 cycles, 4/22 had subsequent re-emergence of MRD. Conclusions Among patients with CLL receiving first-line FCR, the best pre-treatment predictor of achieving MRD-negativity and subsequent longer PFS was IGHV-M. Post-treatment MRD-negativity correlated with subsequent PFS; patients with IGHV-M who achieved MRD-negativity after 3 courses had a particularly favorable outcome, even after abbreviation of therapy. However, despite achieving MRD-negativity, many patients subsequently relapse; serial MRD monitoring in peripheral blood can herald relapse with a lead-time of approximately 2 years and potentially direct monitoring and/or early intervention strategies. Table. Table. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Thompson: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria. O'Brien:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jain:Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Novimmune: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kadia:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding. DiNardo:Novartis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wierda:GSK/Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; KITE Pharma: Research Funding.


2012 ◽  
Vol 187 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Smaldone ◽  
Gauthami Churukanti ◽  
Jay Simhan ◽  
Jose Reyes ◽  
Fang Zhu ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 253 (12) ◽  
pp. 2143-2150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Immanuel P. Seitz ◽  
Ahmad Zhour ◽  
Susanne Kohl ◽  
Pablo Llavona ◽  
Tobias Peter ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S258-S259
Author(s):  
L. Hoffmann ◽  
A. Khalil ◽  
M. Knap ◽  
M. Alber ◽  
D. Møller

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 386-386
Author(s):  
Rodolfo Sacco ◽  
Valeria Mismas ◽  
Antonio Romano ◽  
Barbara Ginanni ◽  
Sara Marceglia ◽  
...  

386 Background: TACE is the standard treatment for patients with intermediate-stage HCC (BCLC-B according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] classification). However, prognostic factors for survival after the first TACE cycle are unclear. We correlated pre-treatment characteristics and response to therapy with overall survival (OS) and time to tumor progression (TTP), in order to propose a scoring system aimed at facilitating clinical decision after the first TACE. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 149 patients (125 males; mean age 65.1±9.2 years) with BCLC-B HCC who received ≥1 cycle of TACE (Lipidol TACE, n=106; drug-eluting beads TACE, n=43). Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to correlate pre-treatment characteristics and response to TACE with OS and TTP. Identified predictive factors were used to define a score for each patient. Results: Median OS was 23 (95% Confidence interval [CI] 11.5-27) months, and median TTP was 11 months (CI 7-11). Complete response (CR) was reported in 63 patients (42.3%) and partial response (PR) in 71 (47.7%). Age >65 years (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.77; 95% CI: 1.18-2.67), ascites (HR 2.44; 95% CI 1.32-4.29), total diameter of nodules >61 mm (HR: 1.96; 95% CI 1.28-3.08) and response at 1 month (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.30-2.20) were predictors of survival and were used to build the scoring system (Table). Three groups of patients with different OS and TTP were then identified. Patients with score 0-1 had a longer OS (57.8 months) and TTP (12.7 months) than those with score 2-3 (21.1 and 8.2 months) or score 4-6 (8.0 and 6.3 months) (p<0.001 for both comparisons). Conclusions: This scoring system may allow the identification of three groups of patients with different prognosis after a first cycle of TACE and may therefore be useful in guiding clinical decisions, in particular whether continuing TACE therapy after a first cycle or moving to different therapies. Validation of this scoring system on a larger population is ongoing. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document