scholarly journals The Incorporation of Public International Law into Municipal Law and Regional Law against the Background of the Dichotomy between Monism and Dualism

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1496
Author(s):  
Gerrit Ferreira ◽  
Anel Ferreira-Snyman
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
South African ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
European Court ◽  
Municipal Law ◽  
The Relationship

Monism and dualism represent two different approaches towards the relationship between public international law and municipal law. While the former views public international law and municipal law as a single legal system, the latter regards these two areas of law as separate and distinct legal systems that exist alongside each other. However, not all legal systems are clearly either monist or dualist. The dichotomy between monism and dualism no longer only concerns the relationship between public international law and municipal law, but also increasingly affects the relationship between public international law and regional law. This contribution discusses the application of the monist and dualist approaches by the South African Constitutional Court in the Glenister case and the European Court of Justice in the Kadi and Hungary cases in order to illustrate the practical application of the dichotomy between monism and dualism in a municipal system and on a regional level.

Countering Anti-Constitutional Argument: The Reasons for the European Court of Justice’s Decision in Kadi and Al Barakaat

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 15-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Eric Khushal Murkens
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Constitutional Courts ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
European Court ◽  
Un Security Council ◽  
Failure To Protect ◽  
Ec Law ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractThis chapter examines the recent decision by the European Court of Justice in Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation. It is a response to criticism that the ECJ’s judgment, in providing for the review of EC measures implementing UN Security Council resolutions, undermines the authority of public international law. Instead of committing itself to international law and institutions at all cost, the ECJ concerns itself with the constitutional repercussions from national constitutional courts (in the case of failure to protect fundamental rights). Important as the relationship between EC law and international law is, there is a clear sense that the ECJ is responsible to, and will ultimately be held to account by, the courts and constitutions of the Member States of the European Union.

scholarly journals Correlation of International and Domestic Law: Procedural and Legal Problems

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-205
Author(s):  
Alexandr D. Magdenko ◽  
◽  
Alexandr Yu. Tomilov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Main Research ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Domestic Law

Introduction. Despite the multiplicity of works on the relationship between international and domestic law, this problem remains relevant, since due to changes in public relations, the understanding of the functioning of the rules of law changes. This concerns the problem of the influence of international law on the process of changes in civil procedure legislation. This issue also complicates the active phenomena of the globalisation of public relations, and the requirement of unification of legal relations, both in the public and private legal spheres. National communities have an interest in this. At the same time, the processes of borrowing and unification under the influence of international law in the civil procedure sphere have their own distinctive feature. They always give priority to national legal systems, which does not exclude, (due to the intensive convergence of different communities), the manifestation of elements of borrowing from the norms of international law. Theoretical BasIs. Methods. The main research methods are comparative legal and historical. The study analyses the relationship between international and national law in the framework of civil procedure relations, taking into account the effect of globalisation. Results. An analysis of the current nature of the relationship between international and domestic law allows us to conclude that the globalisation processes contribute to the convergence of these two legal systems. The modern interpretation of the Constitution in the light of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court marked a departure from the traditional Russian dualistic understanding of the problem of the relationship between international and domestic law in the direction of moderate monism. Discussion and Conclusion. The analysis of the impact of globalisation processes on the mechanism of implementation of international law in the field of civil procedure legislation is carried out. The obtained results and conclusions allow us to determine the features and nature of the current relationship between international law and national law in the framework of civil procedure relations.

Legal Systems and Variance in the Design of Commitments to the International Court of Justice

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara McLaughlin Mitchell ◽  
Emilia Justyna Powell
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
International Court Of Justice ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
International Court ◽  
Bilateral Treaties ◽  
The Relationship

This paper explores the relationship between domestic legal systems and the design of commitments to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Empirical analyses demonstrate that civil law states are more willing to recognize the compulsory and compromissory jurisdiction of the World Court than common law or Islamic law states. Common law states place the highest number of reservations on their optional clause declarations, with the majority of those restrictions relating to specific areas of international law. Civil law states typically embed compromissory clauses in multilateral treaties, while common and Islamic law states prefer recognition of the ICJ's jurisdiction through bilateral treaties.

scholarly journals So Long Solange? The PSPP Judgment of the German Constitutional Court and the Conflict between the German and the European ‘Popular Spirit’

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Peter HILPOLD
Keyword(s):  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
European Court Of Justice ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Preliminary Ruling ◽  
Mutual Respect ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
European Court ◽  
Economic Background ◽  
German Constitutional Court ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract The judgment by the German Constitutional Court (‘BVerfG’) of 5 May 2020 has caused a stir all over Europe. The relationship between the BVerfG and the European Court of Justice (‘ECJ’) has never been an easy one, especially after the Solange judgment of 1974. The Solange jurisprudence has, however, not only been synonymous with conflict and rivalry but also for dialogue and, eventually, mutual respect. With the PSPP judgment, this dialogue seemed to have found an end, while by the order of 29 April 2021 the BVerfG appears to have returned to a more conciliatory tone. Nonetheless, the disruption between Karlsruhe and Luxembourg persists. In this article, the PSPP judgment will be examined in detail, presenting it as the last step of long, contorted jurisprudence. It will be shown that the rupture that occurred in May 2020 was technically unnecessary and rather the result of deep-rooted cultural conflict with a clear economic background. The legal reasoning on both sides—that of the BVerfG and that of the PSPP judgment's most outspoken critics—is problematic at best. While for the time being the BVerfG seems to have learnt the lesson from the conflict provoked by its own judgment, the underlying, substantive conflict is still unresolved. It will be shown that this conflict can only be solved on a political level. Thereby, cultural pre-concepts will have to be overcome. Uncompromising reliance on a national ‘popular spirit’ (Volksgeist) will not offer a way out but neither will, for the time being, exclusive reference to a European Volksgeist ignoring Member State realities. The ‘weighing and balancing’ the BVerfG has missed in the previous Weiss ECJ preliminary ruling (again on the PSPP programme) will have to take place on a far broader scale.

The European Court of Justice Is an International Court

1999 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
European Court Of Justice ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Community Law ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
European Court ◽  
International Court

AbstractThe achievements of the European Court of Justice in instilling the rule of law within the domain of economic integration is to witness to what extent public international law can be dynamic. For the Court of Justice, which attempted to slip its international law origins by characterizing European Community law as belonging to a ‘new legal order’; the post-Maastricht era has been a rude awakening. So effective was the European Court, during its first four decades, that Community law was seen as being set apart from traditional international law; as being sui generis. However, with the Maastricht Treaty and again with the Amsterdam Treaty, it has become evident that the creation of what is today termed the ‘European Union’ is governed by international law and that, ultimately, it is the States and not the European institutions – foremost among them the Court of Justice – which are the ‘Herren der Verträge’.Yet, within the domain of economic integration, the European Court has acted in a truly revolutionary manner for an international court. Barring witness to the achievements of the Luxembourg Court in this domain is to realize to what extent international law can be moulded to achieve results. The lesson to be learnt from the function of the European Court within the field of economic integration is that if there is State consensus, an international court can promote and actively ensure the rule of law. While the uniqueness of the European experience and that of the European Court of Justice may not be able to be grafted onto other areas of the international relations, what the evolution of the European Court does provide is a new way of thinking about international law. The supranational elements, those ‘constitutional’ areas of European law demonstrate the avenues that public international law can travel, if States are willing to allow it.

scholarly journals Human dignity: an illusory limit for the evolutive interpretation of the ECHR?

Amicus Curiae ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Pavel Bureš
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Senior Lecturer ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Relationship

In this article Pavel Bureš (Senior Lecturer in Public International Law in the Faculty of Law at Palacky University, Czech Republic) aims to portray some basic elements of the relationship between the concepy of human dignity and the evolutive interpretation, setting out key elements, notions and considerations for further thoughts. The article presents some basic issues related to the subject matter, then focuses on the evolutive interpretation, and finally outlines the role of human dignity in the case law related to the evolutive interpretation. Index keywords: Human rights, human dignity, European Court of Human Rights

scholarly journals Régimen económico matrimonial, derechos sucesorios del cónyuge supérstite y Certificado Sucesorio Europeo: ¿una combinanción explosiva? = Matrimonial property regimen, succession rights of the surviving spouse and European Certificate of Succession: an explosive

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 769
Author(s):  
Isabel Antón Juárez
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
European Court Of Justice ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
European Court ◽  
New Instrument ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Property Regime ◽  
Sobre Todo

Resumen: El objeto del presente trabajo es el estudio de la STJUE de 1 de marzo de 2018, cono­cido como asunto Mahnkopf. Este asunto es interesante no sólo por lo que recoge el TJUE sino también por lo que calla. Esto es así porque este caso trae a colación problemas jurídicos de gran calado para el Derecho internacional privado como el problema de la calificación. Pero sobre todo pone sobre la mesa un aspecto que va a ser clave en el Derecho europeo de sucesiones y es la relación entre el Derecho suce­sorio y los aspectos relativos al régimen económico matrimonial y cómo estas cuestiones pueden quedar reflejadas en el nuevo instrumento creado por el Reglamento 650/2012, el certificado sucesorio europeo.Palabras clave: Derechos sucesorios, certificado sucesorio europeo, régimen económico matrimo­nial, Reglamento europeo de sucesiones.Abstract: The goal of this paper is to the Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 1 March 2018, Known as Mahnkopf affair. This case is interesting not only because of what the CJEU establishes but also because of what is silent. This is because this case brings up legal problems of great importance to private international law such as the problem of qualification. But above all, it puts on the table an aspect that will be key in European succession law. It is the relationship between succesion law and aspects related to the matrimonial property regime and how these elements can be reflected in the new instrument created by the Regulation 650/2012, the European Certificate of Succession.Keywords: Succesion rights of the surviving spouse, European certificate of succesion, matrimo­nial property regime, European succession regulation.

Countering Anti-Constitutional Argument: The Reasons for the European Court of Justice’s Decision in Kadi and Al Barakaat

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 15-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Eric Khushal Murkens
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Constitutional Courts ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
European Court ◽  
Un Security Council ◽  
Failure To Protect ◽  
Ec Law ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractThis chapter examines the recent decision by the European Court of Justice inKadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation. It is a response to criticism that the ECJ’s judgment, in providing for the review of EC measures implementing UN Security Council resolutions, undermines the authority of public international law. Instead of committing itself to international law and institutions at all cost, the ECJ concerns itself with the constitutional repercussions from national constitutional courts (in the case of failure to protect fundamental rights). Important as the relationship between EC law and international law is, there is a clear sense that the ECJ is responsible to, and will ultimately be held to account by, the courts and constitutions of the Member States of the European Union.

scholarly journals The Direct Applicability of SADC Community Law in South Africa and Zimbabwe: A Call for Supranationality and the Uniform Application of SADC Community Law

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Tshidi Phooko
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
International Law ◽  
Specific Reference ◽  
The European Union ◽  
East African ◽  
Member States ◽  
Community Law ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Relationship

The Southern African Development Community Tribunal (SADC Tribunal) became operational in 1992 and delivered several judgments against Zimbabwe. Some of those decisions are yet to be enforced. The attempt to enforce them contributed to the demise of the SADC Tribunal. The tension between community law and domestic law, international law and national law, and community law and international law is as old as the hills. The monist and dualist theories of international law assist in attempting to clarify the nature of the relationship between international law and municipal law. However, there is no guidance when it comes to community law and national law. This paper will explore on how SADC Community law can be applied uniformly by South Africa and Zimbabwe including all other SADC member states. This will be done through decided cases with specific reference to South Africa and Zimbabwe. In order to learn best practices from other jurisdictions, the paper will to the extent relevant, make reference to the East African Court of Justice, the European Union (EU) and the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The discourse will conclude by making a proposal for the adoption of a revised Protocol on the SADC Tribunal that will assist in clarifying the nature of the relationship between SADC Community law and national laws of SADC member states.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document