scholarly journals COMPARING THE LONELINESS LEVELS OF THE OLD PEOPLE LIVING AT HOME AND AT NURSING HOME

2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (15) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Betül ERBATU ◽  
İlknur Metin AKTEN ◽  
Bülent KILIÇ
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ailshire ◽  
Margarita Osuna ◽  
Jenny Wilkens ◽  
Jinkook Lee

Abstract Objectives Family is largely overlooked in research on factors associated with place of death among older adults. We determine if family caregiving at the end of life is associated with place of death in the United States and Europe. Methods We use the Harmonized End of Life data sets developed by the Gateway to Global Aging Data for the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). We conducted multinomial logistic regression on 7,113 decedents from 18 European countries and 3,031 decedents from the United States to determine if family caregiving, defined based on assistance with activities of daily living, was associated with death at home versus at a hospital or nursing home. Results Family caregiving was associated with reduced odds of dying in a hospital and nursing home, relative to dying at home in both the United States and Europe. Care from a spouse/partner or child/grandchild was both more common and more strongly associated with place of death than care from other relatives. Associations between family caregiving and place of death were generally consistent across European welfare regimes. Discussion This cross-national examination of family caregiving indicates that family-based support is universally important in determining where older adults die. In both the United States and in Europe, most care provided during a long-term illness or disability is provided by family caregivers, and it is clear families exert tremendous influence on place of death.


2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 734-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherina A. Nikzad-Terhune ◽  
Keith A. Anderson ◽  
Robert Newcomer ◽  
Joseph E. Gaugler

1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Berman ◽  
N. Delaney ◽  
D. Gallagher ◽  
P. Atkins ◽  
M. P. Graeber

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Penning ◽  
Denise S Cloutier ◽  
Kim Nuernberger ◽  
Deanne Taylor

1941 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 627-646 ◽  

Charles Gabriel Seligman died from infective endocarditis in a nursing home at Oxford on 19 September 1940. He was bom in London on 24 December 1873, the only child of Hermann and Olivia ( née Mendez da Costa) Seligmann. (He dropped the last letter of his surname after 1914.) His interests in natural science became early manifest: while still at a preparatory school, he began to collect butterflies and, at the house of a boy friend, carried out chemical experiments. He then entered St Paul’s School, but the education he received there was far from congenial to him. Lonely and unhappy at home, reserved and discontented at school, he would often play truant to satisfy his growing interests in animal and plant life, spending his time collecting, dissecting and reading. His mother, an invalid, would sometimes remove him from St Paul’s to spend a term with her at a seaside resort. On these occasions he educated himself by reading widely in the local public library. When he was about sixteen years old he lost his father, and his mother died not long after. On her death an uncle, his guardian, arranged for him to be housed in a family of relatives between whom and himself unfortunately there existed little affection or sympathy. He formed friendships with far older men who encouraged him in his tastes, notably with the late F. M. Halford, an ardent amateur microscopist and the most distinguished dry-fly fisherman of his day.


Rheumatology ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. WILD ◽  
U. S. L. NAYAK ◽  
B. ISAACS
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document