Rock mass stability estimation and selection of mine support design at Orlov complex ore deposit

2018 ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Zhirnov ◽  
◽  
S. U. Abdrakhmanov ◽  
Yu. N. Shaposhnik ◽  
A. I. Konurin ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 2065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonguk Kim ◽  
Hafeezur Rehman ◽  
Wahid Ali ◽  
Abdul Muntaqim Naji ◽  
Hankyu Yoo

In extensively used empirical rock-mass classification systems, the rock-mass rating (RMR) and tunneling quality index (Q) system, rock-mass quality, and tunnel span are used for the selection of rock bolt length and spacing and shotcrete thickness. In both systems, the rock bolt spacing and shotcrete thickness selection are based on the same principle, which is used for the back-calculation of the rock-mass quality. For back-calculation, there is no criterion for the selection of rock-bolt-spacing-based rock-mass quality weightage and shotcrete thickness along with tunnel-span-based rock-mass quality weightage. To determine this weightage effect during the back-calculation, five weightage cases are selected, explained through example, and applied using published data. In the RMR system, the weightage effect is expressed in terms of the difference between the calculated and back-calculated rock-mass quality in the two versions of RMR. In the Q system, the weightage effect is presented in plots of stress reduction factor versus relative block size. The results show that the weightage effect during back-calculation not only depends on the difference in rock-bolt-spacing-based rock-mass quality and shotcrete along with tunnel-span-based rock-mass quality, but also on their corresponding values.


2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 520-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shili Qiu ◽  
Xiating Feng ◽  
Chuanqing Zhang ◽  
Tianbing Xiang

For rock support in burst-prone ground, the wall-rock velocity adjacent to the surface of underground openings is a vital support design parameter, and depends on the seismic source mechanism inducing rockburst damage. In this study, to estimate the wall-rock velocity evoked only by rock slab buckling (an important rockburst source mechanism), a comprehensive velocity assessment method is proposed, using an excellent slab column buckling model with a small eccentricity, which relies on a novel compressive or tensile buckling failure criterion of rock slab. The true-triaxial loading–unloading tests and rockburst case analyses reveal that rock mass slabbing induced by high rock stress has major impacts on the evolution and formation of buckling rockburst in deep tunnels. Using a method based on the energy balance principle, the slabbing thickness of intact rock mass is also calculated by an analytical method, which indicates that the slabbing thickness parameter has a nonlinear relation to the following six parameters: uniaxial tensile strength (UTS), uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), normal stress (σn), length of joint (L), friction angle ([Formula: see text]), and joint roughness coefficient (JRC). These proposed models and methods have been quite successfully applied to rockburst and slabbing cases occurring in deep tunnels. These applications show that slab flexure is an important source mechanism invoking high wall-rock velocities and leading to severe rockburst damages in the area surrounding deep tunnels.


2002 ◽  
pp. 253-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunifumi TAKEUCHI ◽  
Tomoyuki SHIMURA ◽  
Shinichi AKUTAGAWA ◽  
Shunsuke SAKURAI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document