(BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS (SCHMIT ET TOWNSEND) CONN ON CHRYSANTHEMUM WITH K84 AGROBACTERIUM RADIOBACTER (BEIJERINCK ET VAR DELDER) CONN STRAIN).

1982 ◽  
pp. 233-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Faivre-Amiot ◽  
J. Róux ◽  
M. Faivre
1963 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 561-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. B. Madsen

The hypothesis has been advanced that the inhibition of phosphorylase by uridine diphosphate glucose (UDPG), together with the fact that the latter compound is the substrate for glycogen synthetase, is the basis of a mechanism for the biological control of glycogen metabolism in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Experiments were designed to test this hypothesis on the assumption that such a control mechanism would manifest itself by the concentrations of UDPG and glycogen bearing some relationship to each other during various stages of growth and nutrition. Glycogen levels in the cells increased markedly during the lag phase of growth, decreased during the exponential growth phase, and increased again as growth ceased due to the depletion of nitrogen from the medium (nitrogen starvation). The UDPG concentration paralleled these changes, and a high positive correlation between the concentrations of UDPG and glycogen was demonstrated. The addition of ammonium chloride to nitrogen-starved cells caused a prompt resumption of growth, a sharp decrease in the UDPG concentration, and a somewhat smaller decrease in glycogen concentration. Cells placed in buffered salt solution and aerated had a low concentration of UDPG and exhibited a steady decline of the glycogen reserves. Although factors other than those considered here may also be of importance in the control of glycogen metabolism in this organism, the data in general support the hypothesis advanced above.


1980 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 366-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Barreto-Bergter ◽  
Celina Raquel Camargo ◽  
Lawrence R. Hogge ◽  
Philip A.J. Gorin

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Gupta ◽  
Kishore Khosla ◽  
S. S. Bhardwaj ◽  
Aman Thakur ◽  
Sapna Devi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Aditi Sharma ◽  
A. K. Gupta ◽  
K. Khosla ◽  
Rishi Mahajan ◽  
Bharti ◽  
...  

A non-pathogenic agrocin-producing native isolate ofAgrobacterium tumefaciensstrain UHFBA-218 was tested as a biological control agent against the peach crown gall. This strain was compatible with all the recommended pesticides used in stone fruits in the integrated pest management (IPM) module, except for copper oxychloride, which was detrimental to its growth. Upon artificial co-inoculation of 4-wk-old plants of tomato var. Solan Gola withA. tumefaciensstrain UHFBA-218 and tumorigenicA. tumefaciensstrain Peach 2E-10, out of the 27 isolates recovered, six were transconjugants showing selective acquisition of tumorigenic factors as made evident by amplification withiptandvirD2primers, whereas the rest of the isolates did not acquire any of these tumorigenic factors. A white stone powder-based formulation of this isolate (103.3 × 108cfu g-1) retained appreciable viability for up to 6 months at room temperature. When peach roots and seeds were soaked in cell suspensions of different doses of a white stone powder-based bioformulation of UHFBA-218 before planting in the field, the number of plants with tumours was reduced, with the lowest incidence of crown gall being observed in the 0.1% UHFBA-218 root dip treatment, i.e. 1.48% and 0.80% during the years 2013 and 2014, respectively. No incidence of crown gall was observed in the three seed dip treatments, i.e. 30-min dip in UHFBA-218 followed by 1 h of shade drying, stratified seeds dipped for 30 min in 0.1% suspensions of strains UHFBA-218 or K84 followed by 1 h of shade drying before sowing, as compared with 14.76% incidence in untreated plants.


2006 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Young ◽  
S. R. Pennycook ◽  
D. R. W. Watson

It is proposed that Agrobacterium radiobacter has priority as the earlier heterotypic (subjective) synonym when it is united with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The nomenclatural status of A. tumefaciens as a later heterotypic synonym of the united species is not lost and it remains the type species of the genus. Request for an Opinion.


1963 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 709-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. B. Roslycky ◽  
O. N. Allen ◽  
Elizabeth McCoy

Neutralization tests using antisera for 4 of 16 Agrobacterium radiobacter phages indicated that all 16 phages belonged to one serological group. Within the group the phages were differentiated by the neutralization velocity constants, the K-values. Occasionally the antisera inactivated heterologous phages more rapidly than the homologous phages. With some systems the reactions were not of the first order throughout the course of neutralization. This anomaly in the kinetics was not due to hereditary antigenic inhomogeneity in the phage population, as indicated by curves obtained with the parent phage and with isolates which resisted neutralization. Adaptation of the phages to a heterologous host lowered the original K-values with homologous antisera without a change in the host range. None of the four antisera neutralized any of five phages of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, collectively lysing 16 strains of A. radiobacter, including homologous hosts of the phages used in the immunizations.


1983 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. 2641-2646 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. N. Dhanvantari

Crown gall was found mostly on vinifera grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars in Ontario vineyards. The galls were usually small and aggregated along the trunk and cane; large woody galls were less common. Vines affected by crown gall died back in 3–4 years after planting. All the nine strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend) Conn isolated from galls corresponded to biotype 3 in determinative tests and were pathogenic on Datura, tobacco, tomato, and sunflower plants. Eight strains were sensitive to agrocin 84 on amended Stonier's medium. They were suppressed if inoculation was preceded 6 h earlier by Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84 at wound sites on Datura and tomato plants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document