WILD HOP (HUMULUS LUPULUS L.) IN CAMPANIA REGION (SOUTHERN ITALY) IS FREE OF HOP STUNT VIROID

2008 ◽  
pp. 71-73
Author(s):  
E. Ragozzino ◽  
F. Faggioli ◽  
A. Cirillo
2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth C. Eastwell ◽  
Mark E. Nelson

Viroid status was investigated in commercial hop (Humulus lupulus) plantings in three regions of intensive hop production in Washington State. Hop stunt viroid (HSVd), the causal agent of hop stunt disease, was detected for the first time in hop plants in North America. HSVd was detected in samples from 10 of the 33 hop gardens sampled and in 19 of 126 plant samples. Infection with HSVd was associated with chlorosis and reduced plant vigor. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction amplification, sequence identity, and pathogenicity of hop extracts on cucumber seedlings confirmed the presence of HSVd. Apple fruit crinkle viroid (AFCVd), recently reported in hops in Japan, was not detected by RT-PCR in any samples. Hop latent viroid (HLVd), which is frequently associated with hop germplasm world-wide, was detected with high frequency (98 of 126 hop plants surveyed). Accepted for publication 23 September 2007. Published 27 November 2007.


2013 ◽  
Vol 170 (7) ◽  
pp. 688-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Füssy ◽  
Josef Patzak ◽  
Jan Stehlík ◽  
Jaroslav Matoušek

Plant Disease ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-434
Author(s):  
M. Malfitano ◽  
M. Barone ◽  
D. Alioto ◽  
N. Duran-Vila

Within a certification program of citrus, a survey covering 14 citrus fields not previously screened were randomly selected in seven areas of the Campania Region of southern Italy to evaluate the presence and distribution of citrus viroids in the region. During the last 3 years, 112 trees were visually inspected and sampled including 14 ‘Navelina’, 8 ‘Washington navel’, 13 ‘Biondo Commune’, 10 ‘Tarocco’, 6 ‘Valencia late’, 1 ‘Sanguinello’, and 1 ‘Vanilla’ sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis), four sour oranges (C. aurantium), 21 ‘Commune’ and 7 ‘Monreale’ clementines (C. clementina), 8 ‘Common’ and 2 ‘Avana’ mandarins (C. reticulata), 8 ‘Ovale di Sorrento’ and 6 ‘Zagara’ lemons (C. lemon), 2 Tangelos (C. reticulata × C. paradisi), and 1 grapefruit (C. paradisi). Nearly all (37 of 38) mandarin and clementine trees showed cachexia-like symptoms. Severe bark scaling that is characteristic of exocortis disease was observed on a single ‘Ovale di Sorrento’ lemon, the only tree incidentally found to be grafted onto the exocortis-sensitive trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) rootstock, since sour orange (C. aurantium) is the main rootstock used in Campania. Samples (104 of 112) that had been graft-inoculated into Arizona 861-S1 ‘Etrog citron’ (C. medica L.) on rough lemon (C. jambhiri Lush.) rootstock showed typical viroid symptoms. Viroid infection was confirmed by sequential polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis (2) and molecular hybridization of imprinted membranes (1). Citrus exocortis viroid (CEVd), Hop stunt viroid (HSVd), and Citrus viroid III (CVd-III) were the most frequently detected, accounting respectively, for 67.9, 86.6, and 84.8% of the infected samples. Citrus viroid IV (CVd-IV) and Citrus bent leaf viroid (CBLVd) were found in 24.1 and 13.4% of the sources. CBLVd was detected in sweet orange (‘Tarocco’ and ‘Biondo Commune’) and lemon (‘Ovale di Sorrento’ and ‘Zagara’), while CVd-IV was detected in sweet orange (‘Tarocco’, ‘Biondo Commune’, and ‘Washington navel’), lemon (‘Ovale di Sorrento’ and ‘Zagara’), clementine (‘Commune’), and sour orange. Most trees (82.1%) were infected with more than one viroid species. The most frequent viroid combinations were CEVd + HSVd + CVd-III (40.2%), HSVd + CVd-III (16.1%), and CEVd + CBLVd + HSVd + CVd-III + CVd-IV (12.5%). To our knowledge, this is the first report of CEVd, CBLVd, HSVd, CVd-III, and CVd-IV in the Campania Region and the first report of CBLVd and CVd-IV in Italy. References: (1) A. Palacio et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.105:897, 2000. (2) R. F. Rivera-Bustamante et al. Anal. Biochem. 156:91, 1986.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Chambers ◽  
K. Dodds ◽  
N. J. Donovan

Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 484
Author(s):  
Francesco Rossini ◽  
Giuseppe Virga ◽  
Paolo Loreti ◽  
Nicolò Iacuzzi ◽  
Roberto Ruggeri ◽  
...  

The common hop (Humulus lupulus L.) is a dioecious perennial climbing plant, mainly known for the use of its female inflorescences (cones or, simply, “hops”) in the brewing industry. However, the very first interest towards hops was due to its medicinal properties. Actually, the variety of compounds present in almost all plant parts were (and still are) used to treat or prevent several ailments and metabolic disorders, from insomnia to menopausal symptoms as well as obesity and even cancer. Although hops are predominantly grown for hopping beer, the increasing interest in natural medicine is widening new interesting perspectives for this crop. Moreover, the recent success of the craft beer sector all over the world, made the cultivated hop come out from its traditional growing areas. Particularly, in Europe this resulted in a movement towards southern countries such as Italy, which added itself to the already existing hop industry in Portugal and Spain. In these relatively new environments, a complete knowledge and expertise of hop growing practices is lacking. Overall, while many studies were conducted globally on phytochemistry, bioactivity, and the genetics of hops, results from public research activity on basic hop agronomy are very few and discontinuous as well. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of possible uses, phenology, and agronomic aspects of hops, with specific reference to the difficulties and opportunities this crop is experiencing in the new growing areas, under both conventional and organic farming. The present review aims to fill a void still existing for this topic in the literature and to give directions for farmers that want to face the cultivation of such a challenging crop.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document