WATER PRODUCTIVITY OF PEACH FOR PROCESSING IN A SOIL WITH LOW AVAILABLE WATER HOLDING CAPACITY

2011 ◽  
pp. 189-195
Author(s):  
M. Pascual ◽  
J.M. Villar ◽  
X. Domingo ◽  
J. Rufat
Keyword(s):  
Water Productivity ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Available Water ◽  
Water Holding

AVAILABLE WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY MAPS OF ALBERTA, SASKATCHEWAN AND MANITOBA

1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. DE JONG ◽  
J. A. SHIELDS
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Crop Modelling ◽  
Available Water ◽  
Soil Landscape ◽  
Water Holding

Available water-holding capacity (AWC) maps of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba were derived from Soil Landscape maps (1:1 million scale) by substituting AWC classes for soil textural classes. The maps provide information required for the geographical interpretation of soil water and crop modelling analyses. Key words: Available water-holding capacity, maps, texture

Site Quality Evaluation Models for Aspen (Populustremuloides Michx.) in Wisconsin

1975 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Fralish ◽  
Orie L. Loucks
Keyword(s):  
Site Index ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Site Quality ◽  
Quaking Aspen ◽  
North Central ◽  
Available Water ◽  
Soil Calcium ◽  
Calcium Magnesium ◽  
Regression Techniques ◽  
Water Holding

Soil and site relationships were studied in 32 mature quaking aspen (Populustremuloides Michx.) communities in north central Wisconsin. Multiple linear regression techniques indicated that soil texture, available water-holding capacity, water-table depth, and stand exposure were the most important factors controlling site index. Two models developed from combinations of these factors accounted for 62% of the variation in site index. Values for soil calcium, magnesium, potassium, and phosphorus were corrected for bulk density and summed to 12-, 24-, 36-, and 60-in. depths. When included in additional models, only magnesium to a 60-in. depth was found to have additional effect on aspen growth over and above that implicit in available water-holding capacity. The models were validated using 10 additional mature aspen stands and then applied to data from 10 stands in early stages of deterioration.

ESTIMATED SOIL WATER RESERVES APPLICABLE TO A WHEAT-FALLOW ROTATION FOR GENERALIZED SOIL AREAS MAPPED IN SOUTHERN SASKATCHEWAN

1984 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 667-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. DE JONG ◽  
J. A. SHIELDS ◽  
W. K. SLY
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Climatic Data ◽  
Moisture Budget ◽  
Model Soil ◽  
Available Water ◽  
Soil Zone ◽  
Water Holding ◽  
Soil Moisture Budget

Long-term mean soil water reserves for a spring wheat-fallow rotation in the southern half of Saskatchewan were calculated using the Versatile Soil Moisture Budget. Four different available water-holding capacity classes and climatic data from 53 stations were used as input to the model. Soil water reserve data for the following times, seeding on 1 May in the crop year, at heading on 30 June, and on 1 May in the fallow year, were mapped. These were then combined with an available water-holding capacity map to portray in a single map the combined droughtiness due to climatic and soil attributes. Estimated soil water reserves compared well with measured data from one location in the Brown soil zone. The temporal and spatial changes in water reserves are discussed and related to summerfallowing. The maps provide information for use in making potential grain yield estimates. Key words: Soil water, wheat-fallow rotation, generalized soil areas, Saskatchewan, Versatile soil moisture budget

Spatial variation in soil available water holding capacity alters carbon mobilization and allocation to chemical defenses along jack pine stems

2020 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 103902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Altaf Hussain ◽  
Gail Classens ◽  
Sydne Guevara-Rozo ◽  
Jonathan A. Cale ◽  
Rahmatollah Rajabzadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Variation ◽  
Jack Pine ◽  
Chemical Defenses ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Available Water ◽  
Water Holding

scholarly journals Using of Microbial Fertilizer as Biostimulant Alleviates Damage from Drought Stress in Guar (Cyamopsis Tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.) Seedlings

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 147-157
Author(s):  
Alpaslan Kusvuran ◽  
Sebnem Kusvuran
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Foliar Application ◽  
Field Capacity ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Total Phenolic ◽  
Cyamopsis Tetragonoloba ◽  
Available Water ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Water Holding

Drought is a significant environmental stress that limits plant growth and yield. In this study, an investigation of guar, grown under different drought level conditions [(S0: 100% of field capacity), S1 (depletion of 75% the available water holding capacity), S2 (depletion of 50% the available water holding capacity), S3 (depletion of 25% the available water holding capacity), S4 (no applied irrigation water)] with regards to the impact of Chlorella vulgaris based microbial fertilizer on physiological, morphological, and enzymatic activity was performed. Microbial fertilizer applications significantly increased shoot length, fresh and dry weight of the shoot and root, and leaf number and area of guar plants compared to the only drought stress treatments. In addition, following the above-mentioned procedures, there were significant increases in the relative water content, total phenolic and flavonoid contents, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutation reductase (GR) activity. However, the malondialdehyde (MDA) content were significantly decreased. Hence, the results support the administration of a foliar application to the microbial fertilizer containing microalgae in order to increase the guar plant’s defense system, enabling it to tolerate the negative effects resulting from drought stress.

scholarly journals 491 PB 163 A METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING PLANT AVAILABLE WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY AND WATER ABSORPTION POTENTIAL IN CONTAINER MEDIA UNDER PRODUCTION CONDITIONS

HortScience ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 501f-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Argo ◽  
John A. Biernbaum
Keyword(s):  
Water Absorption ◽  
Efficient Method ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Wetting Agent ◽  
Available Water ◽  
Root Medium ◽  
Absorption Potential ◽  
Plant Available Water ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Water Holding

Hybrid impatiens were grown in 15 cm pots containing one of six root medium. After seven weeks, plant available water holding capacity (AWHC) was measured as the difference between the drained weight of the plant and pot after a one hour saturation and the weight of the pot when the plant wilted. Water absorption potential (WAP) was calculated as the capacity of each root medium to absorb applied irrigation water up to the AWHC and was measured at two moisture levels with top watering (two leaching fractions), drip irrigation (two leaching fractions) and flood subirrigation. Top watering moist media (initial AWHC = 35%) with leaching fractions of 30+ % was me most efficient method of rewetting media and was the only irrigation method tested to obtain WAP's of 100%. In comparison, flood subirrigation was the least efficient method of rewetting media with WAP of 27% for dry media (initial AWHC = 0%), and obtained a total WAP of 55% for moist media (initial AWHC = 23%). In media comparisons, the incorporation of a wetting agent into a 70% peat/30% bark mix at planting increased the WAP compared to the same media without a wetting agent with nine of the ten irrigation treatments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document