scholarly journals SSR fingerprinting of raspberry cultivars traded in Germany clearly showed that certainty about the genotype authenticity is a prerequisite for any horticultural experiment

2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
D. Pinczinger ◽  
◽  
M. von Reth ◽  
M.-V. Hanke ◽  
H. Flachowsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevda Babayeva ◽  
Zeynal Akparov ◽  
Mehraj Abbasov ◽  
Alamdar Mammadov ◽  
Mohammad Zaifizadeh ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-sha MENG ◽  
Ning ZHAO ◽  
Hui LI ◽  
Hong ZHAI ◽  
Shao-zhen HE ◽  
...  

HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 516d-517
Author(s):  
Warren F. Lamboy ◽  
Christopher A. Alpha ◽  
David V. Peterson

Simple sequence repeat DNA fragments (SSRs) have been suggested as the method of choice for DNA fingerprinting of grape cultivars. Nevertheless, the use of SSRs as a practical fingerprinting method is not without its pitfalls. For example, when the polymerase chain reaction is used to amplify SSR sequences, potentially confusing “stutter” bands may occur, or there may be non-template directed addition of an “A” to the end of synthesized fragments, or other artifactual amplification products may be produced. Since we would like to fingerprint our entire cold-hardy grape collection of ≈1300 cultivars, we decided to conduct a blind test to determine if SSR fingerprinting actually would be practical in our circumstances. First, SSR fingerprints were established for 45 commercially important cool-climate grape cultivars, the known standards. Then, SSR fingerprints were produced for 44 “unknown” cultivars grown in the Finger Lakes Region of New York. The identities of these were known only to the third author. To independently identity these “unknowns,” their fingerprints were compared to those of the known standards. By this means, 42 of the 44 “unknowns” were immediately correctly identified. The identity of one of the two remaining unknowns was truly not known to the vineyard owner; it was identified as Cabernet Franc, a grape commonly grown in the region. The final “unknown” was a plant of Pinot Blanc, whose fingerprint matched those of both the known and the unknown Pinot Gris and Pinot Noir plants, but did not match that of the Pinot Blanc plants used as standards. This was surprising, since all three Pinot's varieties are simply fruit color mutants of the same genotype. Further investigation revealed that the known plants of “Pinot Blanc” had been misidentified, and actually were the cultivar Melon. Thus, identification of the “unknown” Pinot Blanc as Pinot Noir or Pinot Gris was correct, as were the identifications of the 43 other `unknowns.” This study confirmed that SSR fingerprinting is a practical method for identifying cool-climate grape cultivars.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Pollegioni ◽  
Keith Woeste ◽  
Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza ◽  
Maria Emilia Malvolti

Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 854
Author(s):  
Geza Bujdoso ◽  
Benjamin Illes ◽  
Virag Varjas ◽  
Klara Cseke

The old walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotype called “Esterhazy II” was well-known in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy before World War II, and it can still be found in the Austrian, German and Swiss backyard gardens today. Unfortunately, nowadays, vegetatively propagated progenies of the original “Esterhazy II” are not available anymore around the world because walnut grafting started later than this genotype had become well-known. Although various accessions with “Esterhazy II”-“blood“ are available, it is difficult to determine which one can be considered true or the most similar to the original one. In this paper, phenological and nut morphological characteristics of an “Esterhazy II” specimen planted in a Hungarian gene bank were compared to the varieties “Milotai 10” and “Chandler”. Examined characteristics were: budbreak, blossom time, type of dichogamy, ripening time, nut and kernel features. An additional SSR fingerprinting was used to identify identical genotypes and to demonstrate the relatedness of the analyzed “Esterhazy II” genotype to the other Hungarian walnut cultivars. It can be concluded that under the name “Esterhazy II”, several different genotypes can be observed. All the checked characteristics except budbreak fitted well with the previous descriptions. Our results confirmed that the examined “Esterhazy II” genotype shows high similarity to the “original“ “Esterhazy II” described in the literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document