Nanotechnology Outreach by an Anthropologist

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Toumey

My background in cultural anthropology has brought me to a situation where I work with an interdisciplinary research team studying societal interactions with nanotechnology. Our work benefits from the distinctive disciplinary backgrounds of its members, but it is seldom necessary to credit a particular idea or project to one traditional discipline or another. We borrow freely from each other's backgrounds, and this kind of synergy contributes greatly to the success of our work. Much of what I do, for example, is not specific to anthropology. In fact I sometimes find that people who read my articles on nanotechnology are surprised to find that I am an anthropologist.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph D. Clifford ◽  
Firas Khatib ◽  
Trina Kershaw ◽  
Kavitha Chandra ◽  
Jay McCarthy

2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jahan Lakhani ◽  
Karen Benzies ◽  
K. Alix Hayden

Purpose: To solve large complex health-related problems, there has been a progressive movement towards interdisciplinary research teams; however, there has been minimal investigation into the attributes of successful teams. The purpose of this literature review was to examine the attributes that are important for the effective functioning of these teams. Method: Literature from medicine, nursing and psychology databases, published between 1990 and 2010, was reviewed. Principal findings: Thematic organization of the findings identified seven attributes important to effective interdisciplinary research teams: team purpose, goals, leadership, communication, cohesion, mutual respect and reflection. These attributes are described in depth. Conclusion: Identification of these attributes could form the basis of a new measure to monitor interdisciplinary research team effectiveness, identify weaknesses and promote team development.


1980 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Thorson ◽  
David C. Plaskett ◽  
E.James Dixon

AbstractAn extensive ancient archeologic site containing lithic artifacts and associated with mammoth remains was reported at Chinitna Bay, southern Alaska in 1943. The presence of such a site adjacent to the continental shelf at the base of the rugged Aleutian Range suggested that humans may have inhabited the inner shelf environment during the late Pleistocene at times of lowered sea level. Because of the site's potential significance, an interdisciplinary research team relocated and reinvestigated the area in 1978, but failed to find evidence of prehistoric human habitation. Geologic studies and radiocarbon dating indicate that the strata reported at the site are intertidal in origin, very late Holocene in age, and have undergone significant tectonic movement in the recent past. These observations indicate that the previously published observations of the Chinitna Bay site are probably invalid.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 388-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frinny R. Polanco ◽  
Dinora C. Dominguez ◽  
Christine Grady ◽  
Pamela Stoll ◽  
Catalina Ramos ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 1287-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Newell ◽  
Jacky Swan

Inter-organizational and multi-functional networking are increasingly portrayed as new and potentially more effective forms of organization, especially where innovation is important. This is as true for academic work undertaken within universities as it is for business organizations; multi-disciplinary and inter-institutional collaboration being specified as highly desirable by the major research funding bodies. Integrating mechanisms are essential if such networks are to be effective in co-ordinating the work of a diverse range of partners. Importantly, they are required for the development of trust. Thus, the literature stresses that trust between the parties is central to the effective operation of such networks. This paper explores the evolution of trust within a particular inter-university, multi-disciplinary research team, and develops a model depicting the development and interrelation of different types of trust within this network. The difficulties this research network experienced in developing trust raise a more general question about the effectiveness of interdisciplinary research.


2010 ◽  
Vol 391 (2) ◽  
pp. 1155-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.V. Dodson ◽  
L.L. Guan ◽  
M.E. Fernyhough ◽  
P.S. Mir ◽  
L. Bucci ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document