scholarly journals A Comparative Study on the Recognition between Envoy to Japan and China of the Eighteenth Century Intellectuals - Focusing on the Case of Bong-whan Lee－

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (null) ◽  
pp. 7-37
Author(s):  
김경숙
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Japan And China

Shaykh Muhammad ibn a 'Abd al-Wahhāb and Shāh Walī Allāh: A Preliminary Comparison of Some Aspects of their Lifes and Careers

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Ahmed Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Muslim World ◽  
Preliminary Attempt ◽  
Preliminary Comparison ◽  
Carbon Copy

AbstractShaykh Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhāb (1703–1791) and Shāh Walī Allāh (1703–1762) were, indeed, the two key Mujaddis in the entire eighteenth-century Muslim world. Many scholarly and amateurish works were produced in English, Arabic, Urdu and other languages on their substantial achievements, but I am not aware of any independent comparative study of their careers and thought. This paper is, however, just a preliminary attempt to construct such a comparison and contrast through studying some aspects of their colourful lives and intellectual legacies. The discourse contests, in particular, the neologism "Indian Wahhābism", which had been coined by some orientalists to designate the Indian Islamic reformist movement, because, to say the least, it implicitly, but without justification, condemned it as a carbon copy of Wahhābism, and its vanguard, Shāh Walī Allāh, as a replica of his contemporary Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhāb. The discourse suggests that the Shaykh and the Shāh founded and spearheaded distinct, but largely dissimilar, systems and schools of thought in the pre-modernist era that have had far-reaching impacts on subsequent Islamic reformist movements worldwide.

scholarly journals From Baranowski to Baranauskas, from James to Ngũgĩ: Post-Colonial Aspects of Linguistic Switch

2020 ◽  
pp. 219-245
Author(s):  
Paweł Bukowiec
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
World Literature ◽  
The Other ◽  
Contemporary Fiction ◽  
Post Colonial

The article attempts to perform a comparative study of the phenomenon of the so-called linguistic switch, i.e., a change of languages in which the writer creates his/her works. One side of the analysis focuses on nineteenth-century Lithuanian poets, represented mainly by Antanas Baranauskas, and the other on the contemporary Kenyan prose writer Ngu˜g˜ wa Thiong’o. The juxtaposition of ı such extremely distant authors: 1. allows a better understanding of the specificity of multilingualism in both eighteenth-century Lithuanian literature and contemporary fiction; 2. proves once again the universality of postcolonial sensitivity; 3. constitutes an attempt at comparative thinking in the context of world literature.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND REGISTRATION PROCESS OF GENERIC DRUGS IN JAPAN AND CHINA

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-87
Author(s):  
Dinesh Chandra Konuri ◽  
Mamillapalli S. ◽  
A. Elphine P. ◽  
Brahma S.R. Desu
Keyword(s):  
Pharmaceutical Industry ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Generic Drugs ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Generic Product ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Registration Process ◽  
Regulated Markets ◽  
Device Agency ◽  
Japan And China

A Generic Product must meet the standards established by Pharmaceutical Medical Device Agency (PMDA) & China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) to be approved for marketing in Japan and China respectively. This study covers the introduction to generic drugs, and JAPAN & CHINA regulatory authorities. It also includes the requirements and registration of Generic Drugs in above specified countries. It also includes the checklist for comparative study of regulatory requirements and registration process of generic drugs in JAPAN & CHINA. JAPAN and CHINA are two different markets which are important to pharmaceutical industry. Japan is under one of the Regulated markets and owning the world’s second largest pharmaceutical market. Whereas China is under the Emerging market, but unfortunately these two are un trapped markets in the Pharma hub. So, am enthusiastic to know about Regulatory considerations and Registration process of Generic Drugs.

scholarly journals Comparative Study on Counter-Piracy Activities of Japan and China

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 35-60
Author(s):  
박동형 ◽  
판보싱( 潘博星) ◽  
Ettehadi Saeid Reza ◽  
이종성
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Japan And China

Truth-Telling in the Eighteenth-Century English Courtroom

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Oldham
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Truth Telling ◽  
Innocent People ◽  
Adversary System ◽  
Anglo American ◽  
Truth Finding

Mirjan Damaška, in his 1973 comparative study of criminal procedure in the Anglo-American and continental traditions, asserts that “the continental non-adversary system of procedure is more committed to the search for truth than is the Anglo-American adversary system.” He reasons that the stronger procedural obstacles to truth-finding in the adversary system derive from a collective horror of convicting innocent people.

scholarly journals A comparative study of chromosome characters in four species of Elsholtzia Will. (Lamiaceae) in Japan and China

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuneo Funamoto ◽  
Chunlei Xiang ◽  
Makoto Ogawa ◽  
Hua Peng
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Japan And China

“George II and All That Stuff”: On the Value of the Neglected

2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 581-607
Author(s):  
Jeremy Black
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Political History ◽  
Hard Work ◽  
Rhetorical Strategies ◽  
Archival Research ◽  
Post Modernism ◽  
High Politics

A valedictory article is a piece of sadness, but it is also an opportunity to shout at the wind. This piece is doubly written in that sense, first because it focuses on a king, and secondly because it discusses sources and emphasizes the need for archival research. Readers who are enthralled in modishness, and in the multiple mirrors of post-modernism, will proceed no further, but that simply reflects the peculiar and self-serving nature of the dominant approach to eighteenth-century British political history, with its fascination for the rhetorical strategies of discourse and its lack of interest in the contents and contours of politics, and in the hard work required to re-create them.In part this reflects a sense that somehow all this high politics has been done, but that is deeply misleading. It is particularly so for the reign of George II (1727–60), for that monarch, a king in deed as well as name, still lacks a scholarly biography. This is an important omission, for, without such a study, the monarch appears as a figure of episodic importance, distinctly secondary to his ministers, and as a restraint on them, rather than as an initiator of issues. To understand the king and his role, it is necessary to consider him not thus from the outside but rather on the basis of a thorough study that makes full use of the surviving sources. Secondly, without a focus on the king, it is difficult to understand the Anglo-Hanoverian monarchy, and the problems this created for British ministers. Thirdly, the failure to give due weight to George II ensures that Britain appears more different from Continental states than it should, and certainly removes a possible way to offer a comparative study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document