scholarly journals The institution of the human rights commissioners in the subjects of the Russian Federation: problems of formation and the development prospects

2021 ◽  
pp. 155-163
Author(s):  
V. V. Rudenko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Development Prospects

The article critically examines the changes of federal legislation concerning the human rights commissioners in the subjects of Russian Federation adopted in 2015 and 2020 in the framework of the Venice and Parisian principles. It analyses three main trends in the development of the institution of the human rights commissioners in the subjects of the Russian Federation — ensuring their independence at the regional level, expanding of their functions and competence, and integrating them into the system of ombudsmen in Russia. The author draws attention to the potential of this institution to promote the rule of law in Russia. The article concludes that changes in federal legislations have indicated the institualisation of the human rights commissioners at the regional level in Russia, have increased the authority of this post in the subjects of Russian Federation and have given a new impetus to development of this institute.

scholarly journals The Commissioner for human rights and his role in the protection of rights and freedoms

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 44-46
Author(s):  
A. Ch. Chupanova ◽  
◽  
K. A. Koymurzayeva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
State And Society ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article is devoted to the study of the place and role of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the system of state authorities of the Russian Federation. It also analyzes its special legal status, effectiveness in exercising control over the observance of legitimate interests and restoration of violated rights, current problems of the development of the institution of the Commissioner for Human Rights and measures to resolve them, and provides statistical data. The Commissioner is a special specialized state body with independence and autonomy. It is a connecting element between the state and society and one of the main features of a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The relevance of the topic under study is due to the importance and necessity of protecting human rights and freedoms associated with the formation and development of public life, the construction of the rule of law and civil society. The scientific novelty consists in the study of the problems of the functioning of the institution of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation and the development of proposals for their resolution.

scholarly journals ON THE RELEVANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROCEDURES IN PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS APPLICABLE UNDER ARTICLES 25, 25.1, 28 PART 1, 28.1 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1078-1084
Author(s):  
M.N. Tarsheva
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regulation System ◽  
Structural Element ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Procedures

Legal procedures in a state governed by the rule of law are a kind of guarantor of legality and protection of citizens' rights, and therefore issues related to the development and improvement of the procedural mechanism are among the top priorities. The procedural mechanism is the most important structural element of the legal regulation system, which includes entire procedural branches. The article substantiates the need to develop and legislate procedures within which actions can be carried out to reconcile and make amends for harm, compensation for damage or otherwise make amends for harm (since gaps and shortcomings in the legislation associated with the lack of procedural mechanisms do not allow to fully realize the human rights potential of Articles 25, 25.1, 28 Part 1, 28.1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation), as well as the need to classify these procedures (which has not been previously carried out). The author proposes to divide such procedures into conciliatory and restorative ones. The author's definitions of conciliation and restorative procedures in pre-trial proceedings are given.

scholarly journals Problems of interpretation the norms of General part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-200
Author(s):  
M. P. Рronina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
General Part ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to one of the current areas of legal science related to the problems of interpretation the norms of General Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The interpretation of legal norms is the activity of state bodies, non-governmental organizations and individuals to clarify and explain the meaning of legal norms embedded by the legislator in them and the actual content of the legal provisions (regulations, definitions) contained in them in order to implement them correctly and improve the effectiveness of legal regulation public relations. The interpretation of legal norms is a complex volitional process aimed at establishing the exact meaning of the rule of law. This process consists of two elements: 1) the interpreter (interpreter) clarifies the content of the legal norm for himself; 2) then in order to establish its equal understanding and application it clarifies the meaning of the legal prescription to all interested parties. The first part of this activity – clarification – characterizes the epistemological nature of interpretation aimed at the knowledge of law. Understanding acts as a thought process taking place in the mind of the subject applying the rule of law. The explanation is the second part of a unified process of interpretation the law addressed to other parties to a relationship. It is carried out by the competent authorities and persons in order to eliminate ambiguities in understanding the content of the norm and thus ensure its correct application to the circumstances for which it is aimed. Subjects of interpretation may be public authorities, officials, organizations, enterprises, institutions, individuals. The objects of interpretation are laws and regulations. Legal interpretation is an activity that from a practical point of view is connected with the completion of the regulation of life relations by law. Legal norms as a result of interpretation become ready for implementation, practical implementation. The presented scientific article examines the interpretations given by the highest judicial instance, which showed that in some cases they contain contradictions that violate the legal and technical rules. Examples of the interpretation of criminal court decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are given, and author’s editions are proposed.

scholarly journals ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSE: ONTOLOGY OF GUILT AND PUNISHMENT

2020 ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
Александр Анатольевич Беженцев
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Administrative Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Current Code

Автором исследуется гносеология форм вины в зависимости от степени общественной опасности, делается вывод о том, что признание административным законодательством виновности свойством всех административных правонарушений имеет исключительно важный смысл, так как способствует точному соблюдению принципов социальной справедливости, дальнейшему укреплению законности в стане и отвечает не только требованиям последующего развития административного права, но и нуждам правоприменительной практики административно-юрисдикционной деятельности. Одним из обязательных юридических признаков понятия административного правонарушения является и наказуемость деяния, так как в действующем КоАП РФ применяется как термин «наказание», так и «взыскание». Автор разграничивает данные понятия, делает вывод о том, что наказуемость является одним из необходимых признаков понятия административного проступка, поскольку без административного правонарушения не возможно наказание, точно так же как без причины нет следствия. The author examines the ontology of forms of guilt depending on the degree of public danger, concludes that the recognition by administrative legislation of guilt as a property of all administrative offenses has an extremely important meaning, as it contributes to the exact observance of the principles of social justice, further strengthening the rule of law in the camp and meets not only the requirements the subsequent development of administrative law, but also the needs of law enforcement practice of administrative jurisdictional activity awns. One of the mandatory legal features of the concept of an administrative offense is the punishability of the act, since the term «punishment» and «foreclosure» are used in the current Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, the author delimits these concepts, concludes that punishability is one of the necessary features of the concept of administrative misconduct, since without an administrative offense punishment is not possible, just as without a reason there is no investigation.

scholarly journals On the Expediency of Simplification of the Procedure for Approval of the List of Scientific Majors

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 17-23
Author(s):  
Svetlana V. Narutto ◽  
◽  
Andrey V. Bodrov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State Registration ◽  
Academic Degrees

Purpose. Justification of the need to approve the nomenclature of scientific specialties in full by order of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation with state registration with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. Methodology: the formal legal method, the method of interpretation of the rule of law and comparative legal method. Conclusions. The article substantiates the need to approve the nomenclature of scientific specialties in full by order of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation with state registration at the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, and not in any part of it. The authors of the article adhere to the current (current) model of approval and functioning of the nomenclature of scientific specialties for which academic degrees are awarded. Scientific and practical significance. Arguments are made for maintaining the current regime for making changes and the functioning of the nomenclature of scientific specialties for which academic degrees are awarded.

LEGAL STATE AS THE BASIS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Innokentiy Ilyin
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The World ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional System

Many modern countries strive to reflect the principles of the rule of law in their national legal systems. This problem is being investigated by legal scholars around the world. In 1993, on December 12, a new Constitution was adopted in the history of Russia, which declared The Russian Federation a legal state. This marked a new stage in the development of ideas of the rule of law in the history of Russia.

The Economic Foundations of the Rule of Law in the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1622-1625
Author(s):  
Ivan N. Kuksin ◽  
Ruslan M. Allalyev ◽  
Valery I. Lipunov ◽  
Ilya V. Tyurin
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Foundations

Orthodox Pluralism: Contours of Freedom of Religion in the Russian Federation and Strasbourg Jurisprudence

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 293-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dara Hallinan
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Freedom Of Religion ◽  
Russian Orthodox ◽  
Orthodox Church ◽  
Russian Orthodox Church ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Democratic Principles

AbstractThis article takes as its principal question whether the Russian protection of freedom of religion in law and practice is compatible with the model created by Strasbourg jurisprudence. Considering freedom of religion as a keystone of the Strasbourg model of democracy and in light of increasing concern and uncertainty at democratic progress in the Russian Federation, the article attempts to isolate the realities of the situation in relation to this unique right. It considers both systems in law and their operation in a broader social context and finally considers issues of compatibility between them. In its conclusion, the author argues that, although the Russian Federation's legal framework establishes a similar model of protection to that of Strasbourg, this framework has been manipulated and diminished in importance by, and because of, extralegal relationships (particularly between the state and the Russian Orthodox Church) to the point where it is impossible to say that the systems are compatible. Further, the author suggests that the fact that these extralegal relationships can play such a role shows deep fissures in the rule of law in this area. This is indicative of wider problems relating to domestic rule of law generally and is therefore indicative of problems relating to foundational democratic principles.

scholarly journals ON CERTAIN PROBLEMS OF CONFERMENT OF THE TITLE «LABOR VETERAN»: ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
A. A. Elaev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The right to free work and choice of activity is enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. At the same time, ensuring and protecting the labor rights of citizens is one of the main categories of the rule of law. The legislation of the Russian Federation regulating labor relations is aimed at encouraging a conscientious attitude to work for a long time, and one of these types of encouragement is the title Veteran of labor. However, in practice, quite often there are certain difficulties that arise due to departmental and regional rulemaking. The article attempts to analyze the current situation based on judicial practice.

scholarly journals КОНСТИТУЦИОННЫЕ СТАНДАРТЫ ВЫБОРОВ В ДЕМОКРАТИЧЕСКОМ ПРАВОВОМ ГОСУДАРСТВЕ (ИЗ ПРАКТИКИ КОНСТИТУЦИОННОГО СУДА РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ)

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-107
Author(s):  
Konstantin V. Aranovsky ◽  
Sergey D. Knyazev
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Voting Rights ◽  
Electoral System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Election Results

В статье на основе решений Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации анализируются конституционная природа выборов и их роль в обеспечении народного представительства. Опираясь на сформулированные этим Судом правовые позиции, авторы исследуют конституционные стандарты выборов в демократическом правовом государстве, не оставляя без внимания наиболее «узкие» места современной российской избирательной системы. Так, авторы рассматривают проблемы реализации как активного, так и пассивного избирательного права, такие как «муниципальный фильтр» на выборах высшего должностного лица субъектов Российской Федерации, информатизация избирательного процесса, использование избирательного залога, создание избирательных блоков, судебное обжалование результатов выборов по обращениям избирателей. This article is based on the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation; it analyzes the constitutional nature of elections and their role in en-suring popular representation. Based on the legal positions formulated by this Court, the authors examine the constitutional standards of elections in a democratic state based on the rule of law, without disregarding the most bottlenecks in the modern Russian electoral system. Thus, the authors have reviewed the problems of realizing both active and passive voting rights such as the “municipal filter” in elections of top official of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, informatization of the electoral process, the use of electoral deposit, complaints creation of electoral blocs and judicial review of election results based on voters' complaints.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document