Revisiting Drug Compliance: The Need for a Holistic Approach in the Treatment of Severe Mental Disorders

INTRODUCTION: The limited practice of depot antipsychotics and psychoeducation use, recommended for overcoming the noncompliance of patients with severe mental disorders, is linked to a high incidence of treatment violation. Therefore, the development of personalized mental healthcare approaches is a crucial healthcare task. AIM: To describe and differentiate the role of clinical, social and psychological factors that lead to different level of treatment engagement of psychiatric inpatients. METHODS: Secondary analysis of findings from 91 inpatients, based on the Treatment Motivation Assessment Questionnaire and Medication Compliance Scale, as well as the Scale of Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness and Perceived Discrimination and Devaluation Scale. Factorial analysis, cluster analysis and analysis of variance with p-level=0.05 and the calculation of the effect size (ES) according to Cohens d and Cramers V were used. RESULTS: The nature of therapy compliance in various categories of patients is mediated differentially, including: the severity of negative symptoms (ES=0.29), the global level of functioning and work maladjustment (ES=0.230.26), various motivational and behavioral styles (ES0.74) and the intensity of psychiatric stigmatization (ES0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Consideration of the clinical, social and psychological factors should empirically determine the strategies for the personalized use of prolonged antipsychotics and socio-psychotherapeutic interventions when developing an individual treatment plan for psychiatric in-patients.

Download Full-text

Frequent use of emergency departments for mental and substance use disorders

Emergency Medicine Journal ◽

10.1136/emermed-2015-205554 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 35 (4) ◽

pp. 220-225 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Karen Urbanoski ◽

Joyce Cheng ◽

Jürgen Rehm ◽

Paul Kurdyak

Keyword(s):

Substance Use ◽

Mental Disorders ◽

Substance Use Disorders ◽

Service Use ◽

Secondary Analysis ◽

Mental Healthcare ◽

Specialist Care ◽

Ed Visits ◽

Administrative Health Databases

ObjectivesWe described the population of people who frequently use ED for mental disorders, delineating differences by the number of visits for substance use disorders (SUDs), and predicted the receipt of follow-up services and 2-year mortality by the level of ED use for SUD.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included all Ontario residents 15 years and older who had five or more ED visits during any 12-month period from 2010 to 2012 (n=263 346). The study involved a secondary analysis of administrative health databases capturing emergency, hospital and ambulatory care. Frequent ED users for mental disorders (n=5416) were grouped into nested categories based on the number of ED visits for SUD. Logistic regression was used to examine group differences in the receipt of follow-up services and mortality, controlling for sociodemographics, comorbidities and past service use.ResultsThe majority of frequent ED users for mental disorders had at least one ED visit for SUD, most commonly involving alcohol. Relative to people with no visits for SUD, those with ED visits for SUD were older and more likely to be men (Ps <0.001). As the number of ED visits for SUD increased, the likelihood of receiving follow-up care, particularly specialist mental healthcare, declined while 2-year mortality steadily increased (Ps <0.001). These associations remained after controlling for comorbidities and past service use.ConclusionsFindings highlight disparities in the receipt of specialist care based on use of ED services for SUD, coupled with a greater mortality risk. There is a need for policies and procedures to help address unmet needs for care and to connect members of this vulnerable subgroup with services that are better able to support recovery and improve survival.

Download Full-text

Equitable access to mental healthcare integrated in primary care for people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study

International Journal of Mental Health Systems ◽

10.1186/s13033-019-0332-5 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Maji Hailemariam ◽

Abebaw Fekadu ◽

Girmay Medhin ◽

Martin Prince ◽

Charlotte Hanlon

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Mental Disorders ◽

Health Facility ◽

Economic Status ◽

Mental Healthcare ◽

Equitable Access ◽

Severe Mental Disorders ◽

Rural Residents ◽

Socio Economic Status ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Integration of mental healthcare into non-specialist settings is advocated to expand access to care for people with severe mental disorders (SMD) in low-income countries. However, the impact upon equitable access for disenfranchised members of society has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to (1) estimate contact coverage for SMD of a new service in primary healthcare (PHC) in a rural Ethiopian district, and (2) investigate equity of access for rural residents, women, people with physical impairments and people of low socio-economic status. Methods Community key informants were trained to identify and refer people with probable SMD in Sodo district, south-central Ethiopia, using vignettes of typical presentations. Records of those referred to the new PHC-based service were linked to healthcare records to identify people who engaged with care and non-engagers over a 6 month period. Standardised interviews by psychiatric nurses were used to confirm the diagnosis in those attending PHC. Non-engagers were visited in their homes and administered the Psychosis Symptom Questionnaire. Socio-economic status, discrimination, disability, substance use, social support and distance to the nearest health facility were measured. Results Contact coverage for the new service was estimated to be 81.3% (300 engaged out of 369 probable cases of SMD identified). Reimbursement for transport and time may have elevated coverage estimates. In the fully adjusted multivariable model, rural residents had 3.81 increased odds (95% CI 1.22, 11.89) of not accessing care, in part due to geographical distance from the health facility (odds ratio 3.37 (1.12, 10.12)) for people living more than 180 min away. There was no association with lower socioeconomic status, female gender or physical impairment. Higher levels of functional impairment were associated with increased odds of engagement. Amongst non-engagers, the most frequently endorsed barriers were thinking the problem would get better by itself and concerns about the cost of treatment. Conclusion Integrating mental healthcare into primary care can achieve high levels of coverage in a rural African setting, which is equitable with respect to gender and socio-economic status. Service outreach into the community may be needed to achieve better contact coverage for rural residents.

Download Full-text