scholarly journals First Step Evaluation of Patient with Foot and Ankle Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-208
Author(s):  
Mevlana ÖMEROĞLU
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
John McMaster ◽  
Chris G. Moran ◽  
W. Angus Wallace ◽  
Lucy Wheeler

1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 695-718
Author(s):  
Judy L. Seto ◽  
Clive E. Brewster

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S348
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Le Pine ◽  
William R. Barfield ◽  
Langdon A. Hartsock

2014 ◽  
pp. 499-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Salzar ◽  
W. Brent Lievers ◽  
Ann M. Bailey ◽  
Jeff R. Crandall

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
Ben A. Hickey ◽  
Andrew Cleves ◽  
Raza Alikhan ◽  
Neil Pugh ◽  
Len Nokes ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ananto S. Pradana ◽  
Edi Mustamsir ◽  
Hary W. Agustono ◽  
Ganang D. Cahyono ◽  
Mohammad H. Bimadi ◽  
...  

Background: One of the contributing factors for foot and ankle injury was traffic accidents. A high incidence of foot and ankle injury need to be considered. There is still no adequate information about the epidemiology of foot and ankle injury in Indonesia. This study aims to describe the pattern of foot and ankle injury in Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang, a tertiary referral hospital in Indonesia. We focused on the distribution of population demography, type of injury, site of injury, the mode of injury, and the treatment of foot and ankle injury.Methods: This cross-sectional study collected the data from the orthopaedic and traumatology department from January 2017 to January 2018. Orava modification classification was used to classify the injury type. The inclusion criteria were trauma patients. The exclusion criteria were the patients who passed away, non-traumatic foot and ankle pathology, refused definitive/all treatment, and unspecified injury site.Results: A total of 304 patients have met the inclusion criteria. Male patients dominated the number of foot and ankle injuries. The majority cause of the injury was traffic accidents (93.4%). The most common injury in this study was fracture (50.3%). Moreover, forefoot was the most common injured site (60.7%).Conclusions: In Indonesia, traffic accidents contribute to foot and ankle injury. The traffic regulation needed to curb the menace of traffic accidents in foot and ankle injury. However, further studies with more databases from multiple centers and evaluate the severity of the injury, the treatment, and the outcome are needed to provide a better study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 426-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Hunt ◽  
Daniel Hurwit ◽  
Kevin Robell ◽  
Corey Gatewood ◽  
Itamar B. Botser ◽  
...  

Background: Foot and ankle injuries are increasing in competitive professional and collegiate athletics. Many of these injuries result in considerable missed time from sports and often require surgical intervention. To develop and implement effective practice participation strategies, return-to-play protocols, and injury prevention programs, an understanding of injury trends and epidemiology is vital. Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of foot and ankle injuries in elite athletes participating in 37 sports at a single National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) Division 1 institution. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiological study. Methods: We evaluated the injury records of all varsity sports at a single NCAA Division 1 athletics program, including 1076 athletes participating in 37 sports. Detailed injury data were prospectively collected in a secure electronic database over a 2-year period. We reviewed the database for all foot/ankle injuries. Inclusion criteria were any foot/ankle injury that was sustained during an NCAA-sanctioned event and subsequently received medical treatment. Independent variables included athlete and injury demographics, missed days, physician visits, imaging results, and whether the injury required surgery. Injury incidence, relative frequency distributions, and sample proportions were dependent metrics for this investigation. Results: During the study period, a total of 3861 total musculoskeletal injuries were recorded. There were 1035 foot/ankle injuries (27%). Of all foot/ankle injuries, 21% (218 of 1035) caused the athlete to miss at least 1 day of participation, with an average of 12.3 days of time loss from sport. Furthermore, 27% of athletes with foot/ankle injuries were referred for office evaluation by a physician, and 84% of these required radiologic imaging. The overall injury incidence rate was 3.80 per 1000 athlete-exposures (AEs). The 4 sports with the highest incidence rate (>75th percentile) were women’s gymnastics, women’s cross-country, women’s soccer, and men’s cross country. The most frequently occurring foot/ankle injuries were ankle ligament injuries, tendinopathies or fasciopathies, and bone stress injuries. Conclusion: The prevalence of foot/ankle injury in a large NCAA Division 1 athletics program was 27% of total musculoskeletal injuries over a 2-year period, with 21% of these injuries resulting in missed time. There were significantly higher foot and ankle injury incidence rates and more missed time in female athletes and women’s sports.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0043
Author(s):  
Rajiv Shah

Category: Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Delayed presentation of injury cases is common in developing countries due to lack of resources as well as lack of awareness. Such cases pose a great management challenge to clinicians. Study aimed to find out every possible responsible factor responsible for delayed presentations would guide towards targeted preventive measures. Foot and ankle orthopaedics being in infancy in developing country like India, foot and ankle injuries do present late. We took up a study to document and analyse the reasons for delayed presentations of foot and ankle injuries. Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 482 foot and ankle injury cases treated at our three foot and ankle centres over past four years was done. Delayed presentation was defined as cases presenting to us at or after 3 weeks of injury and all these cases formed inclusion criteria. Delayed presenting cases without complete records and cases who were lost to follow up were excluded from this study. Reasons for delayed presentations were charted and further analysed. Results: Ninety eight delayed presenting cases (out of 482 cases) were divided in two groups. First group (28 cases) never got treated by orthopaedic surgeons, was labelled as ‘Direct delayed presentation group’. Second group (72 cases) who got treated by orthopaedic surgeons, but could not be diagnosed initially and presented late was labelled as ‘Indirect delayed presentation group’. Direct group cases initially followed home, quack or family physician’s remedies. Failure to suspect injury (5 cases) and failure to diagnose injury (67 cases) were reason subgroups in indirect group. Failure to diagnose injury was due to failure of clinico-radiological analysis (analytical failure (15 cases)) or due to failure of investigating case further (investigative failure (10 cases)). Forty two cases had combined analytical and investigative failures. Conclusion: In developing countries like India, many patients neglected their foot and ankle injuries and presented late. However clinicians were found to be more responsible for generating indirect delayed presentations by the way of failing to diagnose timely presented injury cases! This is contrary to common belief that in developing countries, patients would be solely responsible for delayed presentations! As delayed diagnosis by clinicians seemed more alarming than delayed presentation by patients, preventive education should also be imparted to clinicians over and above to patients. Study of such a scenario in developed countries would be interesting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document