Central California earthquakes of the 1830's

1947 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-74
Author(s):  
George D. Louderback

Summary The information and inferences therefrom concerning central California earthquakes reported as occurring in the 1830's, according to the conclusions reached in the foregoing discussion, may be summarized as follows. 1836—April 25, 5 a.m. A “strong” shock. Monterey. This may possibly be a foreshock of the June 10 earthquake. If so, it must have been felt at points around the Bay of San Francisco, but no reports are available. 1836—June 9, about 4 p.m. Monterey. Described as strong and short by Gomez; strong, and of about a half minute's duration, by Vallejo. It is probably a foreshock of the earthquake of the next morning, but no reports are available from other localities. 1836—June 10, 7:30 a.m. X. East of San Francisco Bay. An earthquake of great intensity comparable with and possibly stronger than that of October 21, 1868. Large fissures were formed and “innumerable” aftershocks occurred, decreasing in violence, but “continuous” for a month. The account stresses the effects along the foothill belt from San Pablo to Mission San Jose, which indicates an origin in the Haywards fault. The fissures were probably, at least in part, fault-trace phenomena. Reported by Gomez in Monterey as of more violence and duration than the shock of June 9. Described by Vallejo as strong, lasting close to a minute in Monterey, causing havoc in Monterey and Santa Clara, and arousing great fear among the people. Intensity apparently at least VII at Monterey and Mission Carmel. 1838—Late in June, just after noon. X. Comparable with the earthquake of April 18, 1906. Originated in the San Andreas fault, and violent fault-trace phenomena described by Charles Brown as observed in the hills behind Palo Alto near the present Searsville Lake: a great fissure which he describes as ten to twelve feet wide and running from near San Francisco to the latitude of of Santa Clara; the ground cracked in all directions; thousands of trees broken off; water thrown from creek bed; adobe walls cracked. Violent at Yerba Buena (San Francisco), walls cracked at Presidio, a sand hill bodily shifted (according to Spear); house shaken down at San Jose (town), and walls badly injured at the San Francisco, Santa Clara, and San Jose missions (Captain Paty); crockery and glassware broken, walls of adobe buildings cracked, inhabitants “frightened out of their wits” in Monterey (Major Warren). Captain Paty reported aftershocks as “frequent since” (his ship left the coast September 19, 1838). The fault rupture may have occurred throughout all or most of the line active in 1906, but north and south beyond the limits indicated by Brown it lay under water or in wild country uninhabited by whites (except at Fort Ross, from which we have no report). The evidence of greater intensity at Monterey than in 1906 may mean that the fault rupture extended farther south in 1838 than in 1906.

1980 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 1181-1197
Author(s):  
William H. Bakun

abstract Cumulative seismic moment ΣM0 for earthquake on 50-km-long creeping section of the Calaveras Fault from near Mount Hamilton southeast to San Felipe Lake correlates with mapped fault-trace characteristics. In general, ΣM0 is lower at the left-stepping offset in the trace at the south end of Anderson Lake and along linear segments of the fault than near right-stepping offsets and bends in the trace and intersections of the Calaveras with other faults. Rupture expansion for the August 6, 1979 Coyote Lake sequence main shock, 10 km NNE of Gilroy, California, was unilateral to the southeast (Archuleta, 1979) away from the right-stepping offset in the fault trace near its epicenter. Rupture expansion for the two felt shocks (ML 4.2 and ML 3.9) on August 29, 1978 located 112 km apart near Halls Valley east of San Jose was unilateral for each away from the other, suggesting the existence of a rupture-expansion blocking discontinuity between them. The correlations of seismic activity and fault-trace characteristics are similar to those for shocks along the creeping section of the San Andreas Fault in central California and suggest that the specific “stuck” and “creeping” patch model of Bakun et al. (1980) developed for the San Andreas is applicable to the creeping Calaveras Fault as well. Cumulative seismic moment (January 1, 1969 to August 6, 1979) within the 16-km-long 1979 Coyote Lake sequence aftershock zone was less than that near the fault-trace discontinuities at its ends. Microearthquakes along the Calaveras Fault near the Coyote Lake aftershock zone increased before the sequence beginning with a cluster on June 22, 1978 near the southeast end of the aftershock zone. A similar seismicity pattern preceded the August 29, 1978 shocks and the ML 4.5 May 8, 1979 shock near Halls Valley.


1971 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-416
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Rogers ◽  
Robert D. Nason

abstract The Calaveras fault zone, which is a major branch of the San Andreas fault system in northern California, passes through the City of Hollister 160 km (100 miles) southeast of San Francisco. Active fault displacement (fault creep slippage) has occurred in and near Hollister along a fault trace within the Calaveras fault zone. Various man-made structures crossing the fault trace have been deformed and gradually offset in a right-lateral sense. The amount of offset varies directly with age of the structure. The maximum offset is 33 cm (13 in) of a sidewalk constructed in the period 1909 to 1914. Offsets on dated structures indicate displacement rates of approximately 2 mm/yr (0.08 in/yr) from 1909 to 1925 and 6 mm/yr (0.24 in/yr) from 1925 to 1967. Data obtained from periodic measurement of specially designed survey lines and instruments have indicated a displacement rate of 9 mm/yr (0.4 in/yr) since May 1967. Displacements of the survey lines are not associated with local earthquake events. Rates of active fault displacement vary with time and position along the Calaveras and San Andreas fault zones in the Hollister area. The pattern of this variation suggests that active displacement on the San Andreas fault zone may be transferring northeastward to the Calaveras fault zone.


1967 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 1221-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. V. McEvilly ◽  
W. H. Bakun ◽  
K. B. Casaday

Abstract The characteristics of the Parkfield, California earthquake sequence of 1966 are presented. Historically, the epicentral region is one of the three most seismic areas along the San Andreas fault in central California. It is characterized, however, by a relatively high incidence of large earthquakes in proportion to smaller shocks, compared to other active zones. The 1966 sequence occurred in an area where measured deformation across the fault for 1959-1965 shows a decrease from about 2 cm/year to the north to zero to the south of the area. Neither micro-earthquake nor normal seismic activity prior to the sequence gave indication of its coming. Seismicity before the sequence was confined to the north of the active zone, with some indication of convergence of foci toward the location of the initial shocks. The early aftershock distribution extended 20 km south of the main shock; cracking occurred to 33 km south of the main shock; and intense aftershock activity for the entire sequence extended 27 km south of the main shock. At least 95 per cent of the earthquakes, including the three largest, have P-wave radiation patterns consistent with right lateral transcurrent motion on the San Andreas fault. Earthquakes of the sequence fall very closely along the fault trace. About 75 per cent of the total strain release for the sequence can be accounted for by earthquakes in the main shock region, the principal shock (M = 5.5) contributing only 25 per cent of the total. The sequence is characterized by a high incidence of large aftershocks, an extensive area of aftershock activity, and average focal depths near 5 km-three properties apparently related, and distinguishing two types of sequence traits in central California.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document