Real-Time Remote Soil Moisture Monitoring for Rain Garden Irrigation Efficiency with a Low-Cost Cloud-Connected Datalogger

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karly Soldner
Agriculture ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekanayaka Achchillage Ayesha Dilrukshi Nagahage ◽  
Isura Sumeda Priyadarshana Nagahage ◽  
Takeshi Fujino

Readily available moisture in the root zone is very important for optimum plant growth. The available techniques to determine soil moisture content have practical limitations owing to their high cost, dependence on labor, and time consumption. We have developed a prototype for automated soil moisture monitoring using a low-cost capacitive soil moisture sensor (SKU:SEN0193) for data acquisition, connected to the internet. A soil-specific calibration was performed to integrate the sensor with the automated soil moisture monitoring system. The accuracy of the soil moisture measurements was compared with those of a gravimetric method and a well-established soil moisture sensor (SM-200, Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge, UK). The root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the soil water contents obtained with the SKU:SEN0193 sensor function, the SM-200 manufacturer’s function, and the SM-200 soil-specific calibration function were 0.09, 0.07, and 0.06 cm3 cm−3, for samples in the dry to saturated range, and 0.05, 0.08, and 0.03 cm3 cm−3, for samples in the field capacity range. The repeatability of the measurements recorded with the developed calibration function support the potential use of the SKU:SEN0193 sensor to minimize the risk of soil moisture stress or excess water application.


EDIS ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 2003 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Muñoz-Carpena ◽  
Yuncong Li ◽  
Teresa Olczyk

This document is ABE 333, one of a series of the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date: October 2002. ABE 333/AE230: Alternatives of Low Cost Soil Moisture Monitoring Devices for Vegetable Production in South Miami-Dade County (ufl.edu)


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. vzj2014.08.0114 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. RoTimi Ojo ◽  
Paul R. Bullock ◽  
Jessika L'Heureux ◽  
Jarrett Powers ◽  
Heather McNairn ◽  
...  

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 19688-19697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iftikhar Ahmed Saeed ◽  
Shi Qinglan ◽  
Minjuan Wang ◽  
Salman Latif Butt ◽  
Lihua Zheng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Michel ◽  
Martin Hirschi ◽  
Sonia I. Seneviratne

<p>Climate projections indicate an increasing risk of dry and hot episodes in Central Europe, including in Switzerland. However, models display a large spread in projections of changes in summer drying, highlighting the importance of related observations to evaluate climate models and constrain projections. Land hydrological variables play an essential role for these projections. This is particularly the case for soil moisture and land evaporation, which are directly affecting the development of droughts and heatwaves in both present and future.</p><p>The recent 2020 spring as well as 2015 and 2018 summer droughts in Switzerland have highlighted the importance of monitoring and assessing changes of soil moisture and land evaporation, which are strongly related to drought impacts on agriculture, forestry, and ecosystems. The country was affected by major drought and heatwave conditions in 2015 and 2018. While the meteorological conditions started to recover at the end of the summer, the soil moisture conditions (and runoff) continued to be anomalously low for most of the fall. This illustrates the decoupling between meteorological drought and soil moisture drought conditions related to the intrinsic memory of the soil.</p><p>The only Switzerland-wide soil moisture monitoring programme currently in place is the SwissSMEX (Swiss Soil Moisture Experiment) measurement network. It was initiated in 2008 and comprises 19 soil moisture measurement profiles at 17 different sites (grassland, forest and arable land). Since 2017, seven grassland SwissSMEX sites were complemented with land evaporation measurements from mini-lysimeters.</p><p>First, a quality assessment and inter-comparison of the in-situ soil moisture and land evaporation observations at 12 grassland sites revealed substantial discrepancies between different sensor types in terms of absolute values and data availability. A standard procedure for processing and interpreting the SwissSMEX data is thus being established. Second, analyses have been carried out comparing the SwissSMEX measurements with gridded remote-sensing and reanalysis products that provide near real time soil moisture data. In particular, the European Space Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) surface soil moisture product (ESA-CCI soil moisture) as well as the new ECMWF reanalysis ERA5 are considered. The seasonal evolution of the soil moisture anomalies (with respect to the long-term mean) show for 2020 two pronounced phases of dryness. These are consistently represented in SwissSMEX in-situ observations and ERA5. Also the other recent drought events of 2015 and 2018 show a similar temporal evolution in both datasets. The response of ESA-CCI surface soil moisture is less pronounced, more variable and also dependent on the measurement methodology, i.e., active or passive microwave remote sensing.</p><p>These first analyses provide useful insights in order to provide near-real time monitoring, enhance process understanding at the national scale and a better preparedness for future droughts.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Stowell ◽  
Anthony Brown ◽  
Paula Chadwick ◽  
Sam Fargher ◽  
Cameron Rulten ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gabriel de Almeida Souza ◽  
Larissa Barbosa ◽  
Glênio Ramalho ◽  
Alexandre Zuquete Guarato

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document