Treatment Strategies in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2010 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Jean Christophe Bernhard ◽  
Marine Gross-Goupil ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Until recently, treatment recommendations were limited to immunotherapy and nephrectomy; however, an increased understanding of the molecular biology of RCC has led to the advent of targeted therapies directed against vascular endothelial growth factor/receptor (VEGF/VEGFR) or the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways, both major mediators of tumour growth and progression. These targeted agents have significantly improved outcomes in patients with mRCC, revolutionising treatment. These treatments have overlaps and important distinctions in terms of clinical effects, toxicity and patient populations in which they have been investigated. Concerns in terms of the appropriate sequencing of these agents, their combined use and their role in the context of nephrectomy have emerged as clinically relevant and are being actively investigated.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (19) ◽  
pp. 3225-3234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian I. Rini

There has been a recent expansion of therapeutic options in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) targeted at the vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways, which are fundamental to the biology of RCC. These treatment options have similarities in antitumor effect but also important differences in regards to clinical effects, toxicity and patient populations in which they have been investigated. Further, issues regarding the role of debulking nephrectomy, timing of therapy, and appropriate sequencing of agents have emerged as clinically relevant. There are thus potentially many different treatment approaches to each metastatic RCC patient. This review discusses how to integrate the available data regarding targeted therapy in metastatic RCC into personalized cancer care.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. CMO.S1590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumanta Kumar Pal ◽  
Robert A. Figlin

The agents currently approved for use in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) can be divided broadly into two categories: (1) vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-directed therapies or (2) inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). The latter category includes everolimus and temsirolimus, both approved for distinct indications in mRCC. Everolimus gained its approval on the basis of phase III data showing a benefit in progression-free survival relative to placebo in patients previously treated with sunitinib and/or sorafenib. In contrast, temsirolimus was approved on the basis of a phase III trial in treatment-naïve patients with poor-risk mRCC, demonstrating an improvement in overall survival relative to interferon-alfa. While these pivotal trials have created unique positions for everolimus and temsirolimus in current clinical algorithms, the role of mTOR inhibitors in mRCC is being steadily revised and expanded through ongoing trials testing novel sequences and combinations. The clinical development of mTOR inhibitors is outlined herein.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 627-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Bersanelli ◽  
Sebastiano Buti

Since the advent of immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the attention of oncologists has been unavoidably shifted from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to immune checkpoint blockade, with the associated risk of listing cabozantinib as just one of many available TKIs. On the contrary, we think that cabozantinib represents a very good option for mRCC treatment, with outstanding outcomes in terms of response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and quick time to treatment response. Its safety profile is acceptable and its discontinuation rate, due to toxicity, is similar to those of other TKIs. It is still not clear if the effectiveness of this drug is justified by its wide spectrum of multikinase activity, extended to the MET and AXL kinases, or by the simple maintenance of a ‘vascular endothelial growth factor receptor pressure’ after another previous TKI. Early-phase studies are currently ongoing to investigate the potential activity and safety of cabozantinib in association with immunotherapy, albeit with the risk of an overly toxic combination. Thus, future opportunities to improve the clinical use of this drug will probably be represented by a smart treatment sequence.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 585-585
Author(s):  
Antoine Thiery- Vuillemin ◽  
Aline Guillot ◽  
Thomas Steiner ◽  
Edwin Herrmann ◽  
Konstantinos N. Syrigos ◽  
...  

585 Background: Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor. It gained approval based on the results of the RECORD-1 trial, which included patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) whose disease progressed after receiving vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting angiogenesis that is approved in patients (pts) with mRCC. AVATOR was the 1st study to explore the sequential use of bevacizumab followed by everolimus but with limited number of pts. Methods: In order to further explore this sequence pooled data from the AVATOR, CHANGE and TRAIN studies were analysed retrospectively. All pts had mRCC and were previously or currently treated with everolimus after failure of bevacizumab ± IFN. The primary end point was everolimus time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points were related to the overall survival (OS) of patients receiving the drug sequence, everolimus treatment and safety. Results: 89 pts were included in the analysis. Median age was 68 years [18-90]. At everolimus initiation ECOG was 0-1 for 72% pts and 16% were classified as poor prognosis from Heng classification. Exploring the duration of second-line everolimus treatment, 32% of patients received less than 3 months of everolimus and 35% received at least 6 months of treatment. At the time of data analysis, 20 pts (24%) were still receiving everolimus. Pts receiving everolimus after bevacizumab experienced a median TTP of 6 months [95%CI 4 - 14]. Median OS was not reached for everolimus second-line therapy. At 36 months after the start of first-line therapy, 60.4% of pts were still alive. All grades of common adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of everolimus. Conclusions: The larger size of this cohort confirms the signal previously seen with AVATOR that the sequence of bevacizumab followed by everolimus displays interesting efficacy with not unexpected toxicity from everolimus and compares favourably with RECORD-1.


Author(s):  
Daniel Y. C. Heng ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri

Overview: The treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved over the last 5 years. There are now seven approved targeted therapies against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. The use of targeted therapy, sequences, combinations, and investigational compounds will be discussed. Prognostic and predictive tools are detailed, although much work must be done to find predictive biomarkers in an effort to individualize therapy for patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 800-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Unnithan ◽  
Brian I. Rini

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a highly vascular tumor in which a growing understanding of disease biology has been translated into clinically active systemic therapies. The most clinically developed targeted therapies in advanced RCC are those that target the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) ligand or receptor (VEGFR) and therapy directed against the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Sutent and sorafenib are orally available inhibitors of the VEGFR and platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR). Temsirolimus is an mTOR inhibitor that leads to G1cell cycle arrest and may affect VEGF production. This article briefly describes the biological pathways involved in the development of RCC and the results of clinical trials using targeted therapy in metastatic RCC.


Author(s):  
Igor Stukalin ◽  
Nimira Alimohamed ◽  
Daniel Y.C. Heng

The introduction of targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The current standard of care focuses on the inhibition of angiogenesis through the targeting of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Over the past few years, research exploring novel targeted agents has blossomed, leading to the approval of various targeted therapies. Furthermore, results from the CheckMate025 and the METEOR trials have brought about two additional novel options: the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab and the MET/VEGFR/AXL inhibitor cabozantinib, respectively. With the variety of therapeutic agents available for treatment of mRCC, research examining appropriate sequencing and combinations of the drugs is ongoing. This review discusses the role of prognostic criteria, such as those from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. It also covers the current standard of treatment for mRCC with targeted therapy in first-, second-, and thirdline setting. Additionally, the novel mechanism of action of nivolumab and cabozantinib, therapeutic sequencing and ongoing clinical trials are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document