scholarly journals Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in ambulatory practice

2008 ◽  
pp. 29-33
Author(s):  
N. M. Shmeleva ◽  
V. P. Sidorova ◽  
A. S. Belevsky ◽  
E. I. Shmelev

Quality of outpatient management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and ways to improve it have been studied in this trial. The study included analysis of 560 medical recorders of outpatients followed up in one and the same outpatient clinic by one and the same physician for 5 to 10 yrs and who were currently newly diagnosed for COPD, epidemiological investigation using questionnaire and spirometry in all patients attending the outpatient clinic, and organization of educational COPD center for physicians, nurses and patients. We assessed concordance of the patients' management according to medical records to national guidelines. Most frequent discrepancies were inaccurate recording of the patient's symptoms and history, incomplete and inadequate examination, incorrect diagnosis, inadequate therapy. Functional disorders were not estimated in 95.9 % of the patients, COPD stage was not determined in 100 % of the cases, severity was not assessed in 83.9 %, and 70.7 % of the patients were not diagnosed for complications and exacerbations of the disease. Inhaled bronchodilators were not administered in 41.9 % of the patients, 90 % of the patients were inadequately treated with antibiotics, 100 % of the patients were not vaccinated. The main reasons for this mismatching were thought to be poor awareness of COPD by physicians, lack of pneumologists in outpatient clinics, and insufficient technical provision of the outpatients clinics with spirographs, oxymeters, etc. The epidemiological examination involved 8 672 patients, among them 38 % reported respiratory symptoms and 24 % had ventilatory disorders. COPD was firstly diagnosed in 768 patients. Implementation of educational programmes have led to necessary functional investigations to be used twice more frequent.

2019 ◽  
pp. 17-21
Author(s):  
A. A. Vizel ◽  
I. Yu. Vizel

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic, environmentally mediated disease manifested by broncho-obstructive syndrome, which is not completely reversible.The purpose of this review was to summarize the latest changes in the management of these patients, which occurred in international and domestic guidelines.Methods. The analysis of work on the problem of COPD, available in the E-Library and PubMed electronic libraries, was carried out.Results. The year 2019 was marked by the renewal of global GOLD initiatives and the implementation of national guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of COPD in practice. The most significant provisions are the following: double long-acting bronchodilators are the main treatment for stable COPD; specific indications are needed for the administration of ICS and they are not universal in the treatment of COPD; not all double bronchodilators are the same – their evidence base is not yet equivalent. The analysis of real practice shows that the use of shortacting bronchodilators, ICS and triple therapy remains excessive.Conclusion. Understanding of COPD is improving, identifying the most vulnerable points, problems, the solution of which will make it possible to take new steps to improve the quality of life of these patients and reduce mortality. 


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e043377
Author(s):  
Kai Zhu ◽  
Jagdeep Gill ◽  
Ashley Kirkham ◽  
Joel Chen ◽  
Amy Ellis ◽  
...  

IntroductionPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) reduces the risk of hospital admissions, and improves physical function and health-related quality of life. However, the safety and efficacy of in-hospital PR during the most acute phase of an AECOPD is not well established. This paper describes the protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of inpatient acute care PR during the hospitalisation phase.Methods and analysisMedical literature databases and registries MEDLINE, EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, CENTRAL, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, WHO trials portal and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched for articles from inception to June 2021 using a prespecified search strategy. We will identify randomised controlled trials that have a comparison of in-hospital PR with usual care. PR programmes had to commence during the hospitalisation and include a minimum of two sessions. Title and abstract followed by full-text screening will be conducted independently by two reviewers. A meta-analysis will be performed if there is sufficient homogeneity across selected studies or groups of studies. The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study characteristics framework will be used to standardise the data collection process. The quality of the cumulative evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.Ethics and disseminationAECOPD results in physical limitations which are amenable to PR. This review will assess the safety and efficacy of in-hospital PR for AECOPD. The results will be presented in a peer-reviewed publication and at research conferences. Ethical review is not required for this study.


Author(s):  
Somayeh Ghadimi ◽  
Atefeh Fakharian ◽  
Mohsen Abedi ◽  
Reyhaneh Zahiri ◽  
Mahsan Norouz Afjeh ◽  
...  

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) leads to limited activity and reduced quality of life. Treatment of this disease is a long-term process that requires the cooperation of patients in monitoring and treatment. Methods: In the present study which was conducted from April 2019 to March 2021 in Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Tehran, Iran, 75 patients were randomly divided into telerehabilitation and control groups. Patients in the control group received pulmonary rehabilitation including respiratory, isometric, and aerobic exercises for 8 weeks, three times per week. In the second group, patients were given a lung rehabilitation booklet and asked to repeat the exercises three times a week for four weeks according to a specific schedule. In addition, patients installed Behzee care application on the mobile phone that recorded various indicators such as heart rate, SpO2, dyspnea, fatigue, and daily activities. This application reminded the patient of the program every day and at a specific time. Finally, the patients’ conditions were compared in the two groups after 8 weeks using CAT and mMRC questionnaires and 6-Minute Walk (6MW) exercise indices as well as spirometry tests. Results: In all four indicators (6MW, CAT,  and mMRC questionnaires as well as spirometry), patients showed improvement after rehabilitation (p<0.001). This improvement was significantly higher in the telemedicine group compared to the other group (p<0.01). Conclusion: The use of telerehabilitation in COPD patients is effective in improving spirometry indices, quality of life, as well as activity and sports indices.


Author(s):  
Uma Rani Adhikari ◽  
Soma Roy

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is recently the most common chronic lung disease and presents a serious medical, economic, and social problem for people. A correlational survey research was adopted to identify relationship between quality of life and disease severity among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) clients attending Pulmonary Medicine OPD in a selected hospital, Kolkata with the objectives to assess the quality of life of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) clients and to find out correlation between disease severity and quality of life among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) clients. Purposive sampling technique was adapted to select 138 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) clients attending Pulmonary Medicine OPD in a tertiary care hospital, Kolkata. The structured interview schedule was used to collect on demographic data and standardized WHO QOL BREF tool was used to assess Quality of Life. Standardized GOLD criteria were used to assess disease severity of COPD clients. Reliability of the demographic data collection tool was established by inter- rater method and r was 0.77. All the tools were tried out before final data collection. The finding of the study revealed statistically non-significant relationship between all the domain of QOL and disease severity of COPD patients. Total Quality of Life score is also not significantly related with COPD Disease severity score. The study results also showed that QOL is not associated with sociodemographic characteristics. The study concluded that, there is no correlation between quality of life and disease severity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document