scholarly journals Comparative study of diclofenac suppository with tramadol suppository in addition to acetaminophen for post caesarian analgesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1372
Author(s):  
Reetu Hooda ◽  
Prachi Pathak ◽  
Rahul Chavhan
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
P Value ◽  
Breastfeeding Initiation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Rectal Suppository ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Pain after emergency and elective caesarean section may adversely affect patient’s recovery and breastfeeding initiation. The aim of present study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of diclofenac suppository-intravenous acetaminophen (APAP) combination, tramadol suppository-intravenous APAP combination and intravenous APAP alone for postoperative pain relief after caesarean section.Methods: We designed a randomized double-blind control study. Three hundred parturient scheduled for caesarean section were randomized to receive diclofenac rectal suppository (100 mg), tramadol rectal suppository (100 mg) or glycerin rectal suppository in Group A, B and C respectively (100 parturient in each group). All the women routinely received 1000 mg acetaminophen intravenously. Assessment of pain was done using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 0, 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours. injection Pentazocine 0.3 mg/kg IV was given as rescue analgesia when VAS score > 30.Results: The mean VAS score was significantly higher in Group C as compared to Group A and Group B (p value < 0.001). This suggests better efficacy of multimodal treatment as compared to monotherapy. Group A as compared to Group B showed better efficacy in term of VAS score at 12 and 18 hours (p = 0.05, p = 0.02 respectively).Conclusions: We found that when controlling for socio-demographic characteristics, combination of either diclofenac or tramadol suppository with acetaminophen has significantly better results when compared with monotherapy of acetaminophen alone in post-operative analgesia after caesarean section. However, the combination of diclofenac suppository has proved to be superior in comparison to tramadol suppository.

scholarly journals TO DETERMINE EFFICACY OF GRANISETRON VERSUS PLACEBO FOR REDUCING SHIVERING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 530-34
Author(s):  
Sana Abbas ◽  
Bilal Yasin ◽  
Basit Mehmood Khan ◽  
Umer Hayat ◽  
Beenish Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Intravenous Bolus ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To determine the efficacy of granisetron versus placebo (saline) for reducing shivering in patients undergoing lower segment caeserian section under spinal anaesthesia. Study Design: Comparative cross - sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Apr to Sep 2019. Methodology: Total 178 patients undergoing lower segment ceaserian section under spinal anaesthesia with age ranges from 18-40 years of American Society of Anaesthesiologists status I & II with full term pregnancy scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Group A (n=92) received an intravenous bolus of 1 mg granisetron in a 10ml syringe and Group B (n=86) received intravenous bolus of normal saline in a 10ml syringe, drugs were administered immediately before spinal anaesthesia by anaesthetist as coded syringes. Heart rate, blood pressure, core body temperature and shivering scores were measured at 0 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes, average surgery time recorded to be 60 minutes. Results: None of the patients in group A (drug group) exhibited appreciable post spinal shivering whereas 25 (29%) in group B (placebo) had clinically significant shivering necessitated administration of other established pharmacological agents to abort shivering in order to ensure patient comfort and satisfaction with statistically significant p-value of <0.05. Conclusion: Prophylactic injection granisetron was efficacious against post spinal shivering, moreover provides worth while relief of nausea and vomiting which is dilemma with most of the drugs employed for control of post spinal shivering.

scholarly journals Comparison of two different techniques of uterine closure in caesarean section: Continuous single layer technique versus Babu and Magon technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2197
Author(s):  
S. Vinayachandran ◽  
Vedhapriya Sudhakar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Caesarean Scar ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Layer Technique ◽  
Observational Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: To compare size of the caesarean scar and residual myometrial thickness (RMT) between continuous single non-interlocking and Babu and Magon technique for uterine closure following primary elective caesarean section (CS).Methods: An observational prospective cohort study was conducted at 6 weeks and 4 months postpartum following primary elective CS. Group A included 25 patients who underwent continuous single layer technique and Group B included 25 patients who underwent Babu and Magon technique for uterine closure. Baseline demographic profile, obstetric score, details of the CS and associated complications were studied. Two-dimensional Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) measurements of the length, width and depth of the caesarean scar and RMT were compared.Results: Mean age of study population was 29.6 years. Malpresentation (44%) was the most common indication for CS. Mean Bishops score at the time of CS was <4. The duration of surgery (-2.8 min, 37.96 ±5.660min) and estimated amount of blood loss (-51.6 ml, mean 671.20 ±136.208ml) was less in Group A compared to Group B (40.76 ±4.68min, 722.80±132.083ml respectively). The caesarean scar measurements were similar in both groups at both visits. The mean RMT in Group B at 6 weeks and 4 months postpartum (8.05mm±2.06 and 7.10mm±2.04 respectively) was statistically higher than Group A (6.23mm ± 1.76 and 5.36mm ± 1.70 respectively), p=0.002.Conclusions: We conclude that Babu and Magon technique for uterine closure in caesarean section could result in better healing of the scar and probably reduce the adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies.

scholarly journals EMLA Cream Prior to Insertion of Elective Epidurals

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Elson ◽  
M. J. Paech
Keyword(s):  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Needle Insertion ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Epidural Needle ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Emla Cream ◽  
Skin Infiltration ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

A randomized double-blind study was conducted in 83 women scheduled for elective caesarean section to determine the efficacy of EMLA and lignocaine infiltration for epidural insertion. The patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Group A (EM/LIG) received EMLA and intradermal and subdermal 1% lignocaine infiltration, Group B (EM/SAL) EMLA and saline while Group C (PL/LIG) received placebo cream and 1% lignocaine. Assessments using a 100 mm pain score were performed on skin infiltration and after subsequent insertion of a 16 gauge Tuohy needle into the supraspinous ligament. Skin changes under the applied cream and nursing rating of patients’ response were also noted. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's Exact Tests. Groups were comparable for age, weight, parity and EMLA application time (interquartile range 105-150 minutes) There were significantly higher pain scores for skin infiltration in Group C (PL/LIG) (P<0.01) and for epidural needle insertion in Group B (EM/SAL) (P<0.05). We concluded that in this patient population, the application of EMLA cream for at least 90 minutes plus 1% lignocaine infiltration optimized patient comfort for epidural insertion.

scholarly journals Elective versus emergency caesarean section: differences in maternal outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3207
Author(s):  
Anshu Sharma ◽  
Rajiv Acharya ◽  
Yashika Pehal ◽  
Bhawna Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Maternal Outcome ◽  
Common Indication ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Caesarean section is a life-saving surgical procedure when certain complications arise during pregnancy or labour. The use of CS worldwide has increased worldwide unprecedented levels although the gap between higher- and lower-resource settings remains. The present study evaluates the difference in maternal outcome in elective versus emergency caesarean sections in our institute.Methods: The study included first 65 cases of emergency caesarean section (group A) and during the study period, first 65 elective caesarean section (group B) if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Various intra operative and postoperative events were recorded which included intra operative complications, postpartum haemorrhage and transfusion indices.Results: The most common indication of caesarean section in group A was fetal distress (27.7%). In group B most caesarean sections were classified under 5 followed by class 6, the most common indication being previous caesarean section (27.6%). It was observed that pre-operative mean haemoglobin in group A was 10.6 g/dl and in group B was 11.2g/dl. A drop of 1.36 g/dl in group A and 1.10 g/dl in group B was observed in the post-op period. Cross match / transfusion ratio 1.5 in group A and  2 in group B, transfusion probability ratio was 60 % in group A and  66.7%  in group B and transfusion index was 1 in group A and  group B. There was significantly higher contraception acceptance in group B compared to group A.Conclusions: Elective caesarean section has more favourable maternal outcome as compared to emergency caesarean section as the former is done under controlled and planned circumstances.  However, there should be stringent audit to scrutinise indication of caesarean section, outcome of caesarean and blood transfusion practices.

scholarly journals Comparison of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Butorphanol as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% in Infraumbilical Surgeries- A Randomised Double Blind Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandip Roy Basunia ◽  
Prosenjit Mukherjee ◽  
Md Bakir Hossain Munshi
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Neuraxial opioids are widely used as adjuvants to local anaesthetic as they improve quality and duration of block. Neuraxial opioids like Butorphanol and Fentanyl allow prolonged analgesia in the postoperative period and faster recovery from spinal anaesthesia. Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of Butorphanol and Fentanyl combined with bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in infraumbilical surgeries. Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomised controlled trial in which 110, ASA I and II patients of either sex who underwent elective infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were selected. Patients were allocated randomly into two groups A (n=55) and B (n=55). Group A (F) received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (3 mL) with fentanyl 25 microgram (0.5 mL) to make it total 3.5 mL. Group B (B) received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (3 mL) with butorphanol 250 microgram (0.25 mL) and Normal Saline (NS) 0.25 mL to make it total 3.5 mL. Heart Rate (HR), Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP, DBP), two segment regression time of sensory block, motor block were assessed at preset intervals. Chi-square test or Fischer’s-exact test were used and a p-value ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Mean of two segment sensory regression time of Group A was 41.94±1.73 minutes and Group B was 50.56±4.43 minutes (p<0.0001). Time to onset of motor block in Group A was 5.28±.32 minutes and Group B was 5.27±.32 minutes (p=0.96). Mean duration of motor block in Group A was 81.23±4.87 minutes and Group B was 109.83±2.61 minutes (p<0.0001). Time to rescue analgesic was 289.27±7.37 minutes in Group A and 378.41±10.25 minutes in Group B (p<0.0001). HR, SBP and DBP were comparable among the groups. Conclusion: Intrathecal bupivacaine-butorphanol mixture was clinically better as it provided longer duration of analgesia with lesser incidences of pruritus and nausea/vomiting compared to intrathecal fentanyl-bupivacaine mixture.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLONIDINE VERSUS NALBUPHINE AS INTRATHECAL ADJUVANTS TO 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE DURING LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES – A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND INTERVENTIONAL STUDY.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trishala Jain ◽  
Jaipal .
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Institutional Ethics ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

Background: Regional anesthesia techniques for gynecological procedures are on increasing trends due to their advantage of postoperative analgesia owing to intrathecal adjuvants. The present study was aimed to comparatively evaluate the clinical efficacy of clonidine with nalbuphine when co-administered intrathecally with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for Lower abdominal surgeries in Gynecology. Methods: With institutional ethics committee clearance No. 193MC/EC/2018, randomized, double blind study was conducted. After obtaining informed written consent total of 84 patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (n=42) - Inj.  3.5 ml Bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml Clonidine(30µg) intrathecally.  Group B (n=42) - Inj.3.5 ml Bupivacaine 0.5%+0.2 ml Nalbuphine(2mg) intrathecally. The characteristics of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic data, side effects were recorded. Results: The onset of sensory block was earlier in Group B than Group A (3.08±0.52 min vs 4.00±0.54 min, p<0.001 ). The onset of motor block was also earlier in Group B than Group A (7.78±0.80 min vs 8.80±0.95min, p<0.001). The time to first rescue analgesia in patients receiving intrathecal clonidine was significantly delayed than patients receiving intrathecal nalbuphine (284.95 ± 12.93 min vs 211.52 ± 15.92 min, p<0.001). Introperative hemodynamic changes were comparable and none of the patient suffered from respiratory depression except very little cases of shivering which are not significant. Conclusions: Intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine provided was clinically more effective than nalbuphine for prolonging the duration of analgesia for gynecological procedures. Keywords: Bupivacaine, Clonidine, Lower abdominal surgeries in gynecology, Nalbuphine, Subarachnoid block.

scholarly journals Tramadol as an adjunct to bupivacaine for brachial plexus block.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (09) ◽  
pp. 1482-1486
Author(s):  
Afifa Zahoor ◽  
Ranna Mussrat ◽  
Muhammad Ahmad Khan ◽  
Shakeel Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Orthopedic Procedures ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of tramadol and 0.25% bupivacaine versus 0.25% bupivacaine alone for brachial plexus block. Study Design: Randomized controlled study. Setting: Orthopedic department of Nishtar Medical University/Hospital Multan. Period: The study duration was Jan-2018 to Aug-2018. Material and Methods: 148 patients planned for with upper limb orthopedic procedures under BPB in the department of orthopedics department Nishtar Hospital Multan were included in this analysis. To Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups by lottery method. Group A patients were given solution with 38 ml 0.25% bupivacaine with 100 mg tramadol 2 ml and group B were given solution with 38 ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 2 ml 0.9 % normal saline. Time of onset of block and its duration and need for rescue analgesics were noted. Results: Time of onset of block was 14.56+1.01 minutes in group A versus 15.96+1.64 minutes in group B (p-value <0.001). Mean analgesia duration was 355.85+42.18 minutes in group A versus 310.47+38.79 minutes in group B (p-value <0.001). There were 51 (68.9%) patients in group A who required rescue analgesia and 68 (91.9%) patients in group B required rescue analgesia (p-value 0.004). Conclusion: We concluded that the addition of tramadol as adjunct to bupivacaine for BPB significantly shortens the duration of onset, prolongs the duration of analgesia and reduces the need for rescue analgesics.

scholarly journals Single vs Multiple Antibiotic Drug Regimen in Preventing Infectious Morbidity in Caesarean Section: A Randomised Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhashchandra R Mudanur ◽  
Shreedevi S Kori ◽  
Aruna Biradar ◽  
Rajasri G Yaliwal ◽  
Dayanand S Biradar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
P Value ◽  
Infectious Morbidity ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Surgical site infections are a serious cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Various preventive measures are being used to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections. One of them is the use of prophylactic antibiotics. In this study, authors have evaluated three antibiotic regimen with respect to preventing infectious morbidity in caesarean section. Aim: To study the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a single dose (ceftriaxone) versus multiple doses of antibiotic therapy (ceftriaxone and ornidazole) administered preoperatively in women undergoing caesarean delivery. Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted on 300 pregnant women undergoing emergency or elective caesarean delivery. Study was conducted at BLDE (DU) Shri BM Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups by block random sampling with 100 women in each group. Group A received Inj. ceftriaxone 1 gm single dose 60 minutes prior to commencement of surgery. Group B received Inj. ceftriaxone 1 gm along with Inj. ornidazole 500 mg intravenous infusion 60 minutes prior to commencement of surgery and Group C received Inj. ceftriaxone 1 gm and Inj. ornidazole 500 mg intravenous infusion 60 minutes prior to commencement of surgery and a repeat dose 12th hourly for 24 hours followed by Tab. cefixime 200 mg and Tab. ornidazole 500 mg twice daily for four days postoperatively. The effectiveness of therapy was measured in terms of adverse effects of antibiotics such as nausea and vomiting and postoperative complications like pyrexia, foul smelling lochia, surgical site infections, uterine tenderness, peritonitis and endometritis. Results: There was no statistical difference in outcome measures in side-effects of antibiotics (p-value=0.13), fever (p-value=0.68), lochia discharge (p-value=0.88), wound infection (p-value=0.39) and peritonitis (p-value=0.30) among the three groups. The single dose medication in group A had a cost of Rs.60 INR (0.82 cents USD), which was significantly less compared to the multiple dose regimens in group B that cost Rs.203 INR ($2.76 USD). The mean hospital stay in non infectious and infectious patients were 5 and 10 days in present study (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Caesarean delivery poses 5-20 times greater risk of postoperative infection when compared to vaginal birth. There has been a shifting trend of increasing caesarean deliveries and postoperative infections can contribute to overwhelming health and economic burden. Present study shows outcome measures which were statistically insignificant among the three study groups with different prophylactic regimen for caesarean delivery, so it’s safe to state that both single dose and multiple dose regimen provided equal protective coverage in reducing maternal infectious morbidity. Also, single dose regimen proved to be cost-effective. So, to conclude single dose prophylactic antibiotic given preoperatively in caesarean section is both cost-effective and as is efficient.

scholarly journals Comparison of Ondansetron and Granisetron for prevention of PONV following elective LUCS

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Raihan Uddin ◽  
Lutful Aziz ◽  
SN Samad Choudhury
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Oral Ondansetron

The aim of the study was to compare the antiemetic effects of oral ondansetron (8mg) and granisectron (2mg) for prevention of PONV following elective caesarean section. Ninety parturients scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups. Group A (n=30) were received vitamin tab, group B (n=30) parturients were received oral ondansectron (8mg) & group C (n=30) parturients were received oral granisetron (2mg). Anesthetic procedure was common to all groups. Emetic episodes in early postoperative period (1st 24 hrs.) were recorded and compared in different study groups. Emetic episodes were observed in six parturients (20%) in group A (control), 3 parturients in group B (3%) and 3 parturients in group C (3%). So to conclude, minimal emetic episodes were observed in early postoperative period in parturients who had received ondensetron or granisetron than the control group. Keywords: LUCS, PONV, Ondansetron, and Granisetron. Journal of BSA, Vol. 20, No. 2, July 2007 p.61-65

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF TAP BLOCK AND PLACEBO FOR PAIN IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CSECTION SURGERY

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 266-69
Author(s):  
Usman Khalid ◽  
Kaukab Majeed ◽  
Maihmoona Yasmeen ◽  
Khalid Mehmood ◽  
Muhammad Ali Muazzam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block and placebo for pain in patients undergoing C-section surgery. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesiology, Combined Military Hospital Quetta, from Apr toOct 2018. Methodology: A sample size of 200 patients calculated by WHO calculator undergoing Elective C-section andof age 20-40 year were randomized in a double blind study to undergo transversus abdominis plane block orplacebo group in two equal groups. Group A received block as placebo and group B with Bupivacaine. Resultsrecorded and analysed there-after for conclusion. Results: The mean age of patients in group A was 29.98 ± 5.18 years and in group B was 29.68 ± 5.43 years (pvalue ≤0.01). Majority of the patients 141 (70.50%) were between 31 to 40 years of age. Out of 200 patients, 108 (54.0%) were ASA I and 92 (46.0%) were ASA II (p-value ≤0.01). Mean body mass index was 25.20 ± 2.28 kg/m2 (p-value ≤0.01). Meantime for the first analgesia in the patients undergoing elective C-section in group A (placebo group) was 4.96 ± 1.44 hours while in group B (transversus abdominis plane block group) was 11.24 ± 1.83 hours (p-value ≤0.01). Conclusion: This study concluded that meantime for the first analgesia was found longer in TransversusAbdominis plane block for post-operative pain management in patients undergoing elective C-section.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document