scholarly journals Comparison of Ondansetron and Granisetron for prevention of PONV following elective LUCS

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Raihan Uddin ◽  
Lutful Aziz ◽  
SN Samad Choudhury
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Oral Ondansetron

The aim of the study was to compare the antiemetic effects of oral ondansetron (8mg) and granisectron (2mg) for prevention of PONV following elective caesarean section. Ninety parturients scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups. Group A (n=30) were received vitamin tab, group B (n=30) parturients were received oral ondansectron (8mg) & group C (n=30) parturients were received oral granisetron (2mg). Anesthetic procedure was common to all groups. Emetic episodes in early postoperative period (1st 24 hrs.) were recorded and compared in different study groups. Emetic episodes were observed in six parturients (20%) in group A (control), 3 parturients in group B (3%) and 3 parturients in group C (3%). So to conclude, minimal emetic episodes were observed in early postoperative period in parturients who had received ondensetron or granisetron than the control group. Keywords: LUCS, PONV, Ondansetron, and Granisetron. Journal of BSA, Vol. 20, No. 2, July 2007 p.61-65

scholarly journals TO DETERMINE EFFICACY OF GRANISETRON VERSUS PLACEBO FOR REDUCING SHIVERING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 530-34
Author(s):  
Sana Abbas ◽  
Bilal Yasin ◽  
Basit Mehmood Khan ◽  
Umer Hayat ◽  
Beenish Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Intravenous Bolus ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To determine the efficacy of granisetron versus placebo (saline) for reducing shivering in patients undergoing lower segment caeserian section under spinal anaesthesia. Study Design: Comparative cross - sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Apr to Sep 2019. Methodology: Total 178 patients undergoing lower segment ceaserian section under spinal anaesthesia with age ranges from 18-40 years of American Society of Anaesthesiologists status I & II with full term pregnancy scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Group A (n=92) received an intravenous bolus of 1 mg granisetron in a 10ml syringe and Group B (n=86) received intravenous bolus of normal saline in a 10ml syringe, drugs were administered immediately before spinal anaesthesia by anaesthetist as coded syringes. Heart rate, blood pressure, core body temperature and shivering scores were measured at 0 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes, average surgery time recorded to be 60 minutes. Results: None of the patients in group A (drug group) exhibited appreciable post spinal shivering whereas 25 (29%) in group B (placebo) had clinically significant shivering necessitated administration of other established pharmacological agents to abort shivering in order to ensure patient comfort and satisfaction with statistically significant p-value of <0.05. Conclusion: Prophylactic injection granisetron was efficacious against post spinal shivering, moreover provides worth while relief of nausea and vomiting which is dilemma with most of the drugs employed for control of post spinal shivering.

scholarly journals Effect of Hydrocortisone on Reducing severity of Post Dural Puncture Headache after Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-472
Author(s):  
Shumaila Ashfaq ◽  
Liaqat Ali ◽  
Muhammad Ashraf Zia ◽  
Rizwan Ahmad Khan ◽  
Mehtash Butt
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Spinal anesthesia is frequently used in pregnant female undergoing caesarean section due to its safety than general anaesthesia. Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is commonly occurring problem associated with spinal anaesthesia and causes a considerable morbidity. PDPH depends on several factor and various methods have been used to reduce and treat the pain of PDPH. We evaluated effects of hydrocortisone on the treatment of PDPH in obstetrical patient. To compare mean decrease in Visual Analogue Scalepain score in patients who developed PDPH after elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia who were given conventional treatment versus conventional treatment plus hydrocortisone. Double blind randomized control trial. Study conducted in department of anaesthesia and obstetrics of Allama Iqbal Medical College, Jinnah hospital (tertiary care) conducted from13th June 2014 to 13th December 2014. Sample size was calculated 60 (30 each) cases using 95% confidence interval, 80% power of test. Patients who developed PDPH after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section were divided into 2 group; Group A (Conventional Treatment) and Group B, (Conventional Treatment plus Hydrocortisone 100mg 8 hourly for 48 hours). Details were recorded regarding age; mean pretreatment and post treatment VAS after 6 hours. Mean decrease in pain VAS score was 3.30 + 1.2 in group A while 7.17+ 1.3 in group B. (P value 0.001). Intravenous hydrocortisone is more effective in reducing post dural puncture headache pain severity after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section when given along with conventional treatment as compared to conventional treatment alone.

scholarly journals Comparison of Ondansetron And Ondansetron Plus Alprazolum for Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Following Elective Caesarean Section

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
Md Rafiqul Hasan Khan ◽  
SN Samad Choudhury
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Pregnancy & operation both causes anxiety. Excessive anxiety & noncompliance with fasting can increase gastric volume & predispose patients to postoperative nausea & vomiting. Prevention rather than treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting should be the anesthetist's aim. It was a prospective double blind comparative study of 60 parturient scheduled for elective caesarean section under subarachnoid block to see the effect of anxiolytic drug on per & PONV in LUCS. We have carried out comparative study with alprazolum as anxiolytic agent & compared the action of Ondansetron with Ondansetron +alprazolum. Parturient at term or elective caesarean section included in the study were ASA grade I & II. A total of 60 cards, 30 in each group were prepared by another person who was blind for the study. Every parturient was allowed to draw one card and grouped accordingly. Group A: Inj. Ondansetron (8mg), Group B: Oral alprazolum (0.25mg) +inj. ondansetron (8mg). After 20 minutes of prehydration under all aseptic precaution lumber puncture was performed with 25 gauge Quincke's needle in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 space in sitting position and 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 2.5 ml (12.5 mg.) was injected within 10-12 sec. Immediately after administration of spinal anaesthesia fetal heart rate was noted for any changes in pulse rate, blood pressure, rate of respiration, discomfort and occurrence of side effects: shivering, nausea, vomiting was recorded every 2 minute for first 10 minutes, then at 10 minutes interval for remainder of the operation. Per operative monitoring such as ECG, continuous SpO2, non invasive arterial blood pressure was recorded each two minutes interval from time of intrathecal injection up to 10 minutes and then at 10 minutes interval until the end of operation. In the recovery room postoperative analgesia was provided with injection ketorolac tromethamine 30 mg IM on complaining pain and repeated in all patients if necessary. Presence of nausea and vomiting patients were interviewed at one hourly over the first 3 hours then at 3 hourly up to 24 hours postoperative period. Rescue antiemetic of prochlorparazine 10 mg I/M was given if vomiting occurs once, nausea for 10 minutes or at the patient request. Rest other parameters as for example; heart rate, BP, respiration and SpO2 were also recorded at same interval. Patients were carefully observed for any adverse effects like headache, flushing, drowsiness or any other symptoms. In the present study incidence of nausea and vomiting in group-A was one and in group-B was zero. Regarding hemodynamic changes (Pulse, Blood pressure) SpO2, respiratory changes, during operation and 24 hours post operative period in some occasions significant changes were observed (P<0.05) but in other occasions no significant changes occur. No other adverse effect like headache, constipation and flushing during operation and 24 hours postoperative period were observed in this study. In this study we have found that Ondansetron reduces peroperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting. But addition of Alprazolum (an anxiolytic) to Ondansetron, the chance of nausea and vomiting was less.   Journal of BSA, Vol. 21, No. 1, January 2008 43-49

scholarly journals THE EFFICACY OF INTRATHECAL DEXAMETHASONE TO PREVENT EARLY COMPLICATIONS OF SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE CAESAREAN SECTION

2020 ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Nataliya Pyasetska
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Early Complications ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Group B

Spinal anaesthesia is commonly used for elective caesarean section. But it has some disadvantages and complications in intra- and postoperative period. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of intrathecal or intravenous dexamethasone to prevent some early complications of spinal anaesthesia such as arterial hypotonia, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, shivering etc.  Material and methods: there were examined 154 healthy, not obese women, ASA I–II, 18–36 years old, 36–40 weeks of gestation, undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. All patients were divided into three equal groups for randomized, prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The women of each group received intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % 10 mg. Group B (n=51) additionally received intrathecal 1 ml of normal saline=placebo; Group BD (n=52) additionally received 4 mg (1 ml) intrathecal dexamethasone, and Group D (n=51) received 8 mg intravenous dexamethasone directly after spinal puncture. The patients were evaluated for blood pressure, heart rate, nausea, vomiting, shivering or other complications during intra- or postoperative period (24 h). The complications that required medicines correction were recorded and cured. Results: the addition of intrathecal dexamethasone in Group BD vs Group B significantly decreased frequency and manifestations of arterial hypotonia and nausea (Pearson's χ2 =0.486 and χ2=0.479, p<0.05) in intra- and postoperative period after the spinal anaesthesia in elective caesarean section. Intrathecal dexamethasone in Group BD vs Group B significantly reduced shivering (Pearson's χ2=0.316, p<0.05) in intra- and postoperative period, and significantly didn`t impact on vomiting and bradycardia. Conclusions: the addition of 4 mg intrathecal dexamethasone as an adjuvant for spinal anaesthesia can significantly decrease frequency and manifestations of arterial hypotonia and nausea, reduce shivering during perioperative period. The addition of 8 mg intravenous dexamethasone has not the same quality.

scholarly journals Comparison of two different techniques of uterine closure in caesarean section: Continuous single layer technique versus Babu and Magon technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2197
Author(s):  
S. Vinayachandran ◽  
Vedhapriya Sudhakar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Caesarean Scar ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Layer Technique ◽  
Observational Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: To compare size of the caesarean scar and residual myometrial thickness (RMT) between continuous single non-interlocking and Babu and Magon technique for uterine closure following primary elective caesarean section (CS).Methods: An observational prospective cohort study was conducted at 6 weeks and 4 months postpartum following primary elective CS. Group A included 25 patients who underwent continuous single layer technique and Group B included 25 patients who underwent Babu and Magon technique for uterine closure. Baseline demographic profile, obstetric score, details of the CS and associated complications were studied. Two-dimensional Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) measurements of the length, width and depth of the caesarean scar and RMT were compared.Results: Mean age of study population was 29.6 years. Malpresentation (44%) was the most common indication for CS. Mean Bishops score at the time of CS was <4. The duration of surgery (-2.8 min, 37.96 ±5.660min) and estimated amount of blood loss (-51.6 ml, mean 671.20 ±136.208ml) was less in Group A compared to Group B (40.76 ±4.68min, 722.80±132.083ml respectively). The caesarean scar measurements were similar in both groups at both visits. The mean RMT in Group B at 6 weeks and 4 months postpartum (8.05mm±2.06 and 7.10mm±2.04 respectively) was statistically higher than Group A (6.23mm ± 1.76 and 5.36mm ± 1.70 respectively), p=0.002.Conclusions: We conclude that Babu and Magon technique for uterine closure in caesarean section could result in better healing of the scar and probably reduce the adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies.

scholarly journals Elective versus emergency caesarean section: differences in maternal outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3207
Author(s):  
Anshu Sharma ◽  
Rajiv Acharya ◽  
Yashika Pehal ◽  
Bhawna Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Maternal Outcome ◽  
Common Indication ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Caesarean section is a life-saving surgical procedure when certain complications arise during pregnancy or labour. The use of CS worldwide has increased worldwide unprecedented levels although the gap between higher- and lower-resource settings remains. The present study evaluates the difference in maternal outcome in elective versus emergency caesarean sections in our institute.Methods: The study included first 65 cases of emergency caesarean section (group A) and during the study period, first 65 elective caesarean section (group B) if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Various intra operative and postoperative events were recorded which included intra operative complications, postpartum haemorrhage and transfusion indices.Results: The most common indication of caesarean section in group A was fetal distress (27.7%). In group B most caesarean sections were classified under 5 followed by class 6, the most common indication being previous caesarean section (27.6%). It was observed that pre-operative mean haemoglobin in group A was 10.6 g/dl and in group B was 11.2g/dl. A drop of 1.36 g/dl in group A and 1.10 g/dl in group B was observed in the post-op period. Cross match / transfusion ratio 1.5 in group A and  2 in group B, transfusion probability ratio was 60 % in group A and  66.7%  in group B and transfusion index was 1 in group A and  group B. There was significantly higher contraception acceptance in group B compared to group A.Conclusions: Elective caesarean section has more favourable maternal outcome as compared to emergency caesarean section as the former is done under controlled and planned circumstances.  However, there should be stringent audit to scrutinise indication of caesarean section, outcome of caesarean and blood transfusion practices.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Tamsulosin and Alfuzosin in Management of Distal Ureteral Stones

Med Phoenix ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Bimochan Piya ◽  
Abhishek Bhattarai
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Diclofenac Sodium ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Expulsion Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Urinary tract calculi are the most frequent condition in urology clinics worldwide. The overall prevalence is about 5 % and lower urinary tract stones account for 70% among them. Medical expulsive therapy has been used to treat distal ureteric stone as it reduces symptoms and facilitates stone expulsion. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of tamsulosin and alfuzosin as medical therapy in ureteric stones. Materials and Methods: A total of 87 patients with distal ureteral stones of size ≤10 mm were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group A patients (n-30) received 0.4 mg of tamsulosin daily, group B patients (n-29) received 10 mg of alfuzosin daily and group C patients (n-28) received 75 mg of diclofenac sodium. Patients in all groups received diclofenac sodium for one week and then as required. Follow-up was done on a weekly basis for 4 weeks. The stone expulsion rate, time for stone expulsion, and side-effects were recorded in each group. Results: The mean stone size (5.66, 5.79, 5.67) mm and age (29.1, 30.31, 29.4) were comparable in each group. The stone expulsion rate was 83.3%, 79.3%, and 50% in groups A, B, and C respectively.  It showed that both the study groups (Group A and Group B) were effective than the control group (p-value 0.006 and 0.02 respectively) but there was no difference between tamsulosin and alfuzosin (p-value 0.69). The duration of stone expulsion was 11.5 days, 11.8 days, and 17.3 days for Group A, B, and C respectively. The drugs related side effects reported by patients were mild and transient. Conclusion:  The use of tamsulosin and alfuzosin for the medical treatment of ureteric stones proved to be safe and effective and neither did have any significant benefits over the other.

scholarly journals Changing trends and determinants of caesarean section using robson criteria in a government tertiary level hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1066
Author(s):  
Anjali Singh ◽  
Renuka Malik
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
World Health ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group B ◽  
Level Hospital

Background: Robson Ten group classification system (TGCS) was proposed by World Health Organisation in 2014 for assessing, monitoring and comparing caesarean section rate between and within healthcare facilities. This tool was used in this study to analyse the determinants of caesarean section and compare with data of past.Methods: This observational comparative study was conducted at tertiary level hospital and included in study group A, 300 women delivered by caesarean section from November 2018 to November 2019 and in study group B, 300 women delivered by caesarean section from November 2015 to December 2016. The caesarean sections were classified as per TGCS to determine relative and absolute contribution made by each group to the overall caesarean section rate. The results were analysed to for determinants and change in trend.Results: In this study, the caesarean section rate in group A was 29.32% and group B was 28.03%. Group 2, 5, 1, 10 made the maximum contributions to overall caesarean section rate in both study groups. Group 2 was the largest contributor (25.00%) in study group A and 27.33% in study group B to overall caesarean sections.Conclusions: Implementing Robsons TGCS can help in comparing caesarean in an institution over a period of time and also among different institution at national and international level as a method of internal auditing, paving a way to rationalise and decrease Caesarean rate. 

scholarly journals The incidence and management of hypotension in the pregnant parturients undergoing caesarean section following spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1205
Author(s):  
Shashi Dinkar Minj ◽  
Rameshwari Beck ◽  
Ajit Kumar ◽  
Praveen Tiwari ◽  
Raj Kumar Chandan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Single Term ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Successful Technique ◽  
Group B

Background: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is not a 100% successful technique. At times, despite straightforward insertion and drug administration, intrathecal anaesthesia for cesarean section fails to obtain any sensory or motor block.Methods: This study is aimed at comparing the incidence of hypotension and the need for vasopressors in patients submitted to caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia following preload with either crystalloid or colloid. This study was carried out on 100 healthy pregnant women with single term foetus and not in labor admitted at the labor room of Gynecological department of RIMS. Blood pressure, Pulse rate, O2 Saturation and episodes of hypotension were recorded every 5 minutes from the spinal block.Results: The study showed that maximum number of caesarean sections here performed for the indication of foetal distress which is seen in 44%, 48%, 52%, and 48% in Group A, Group B, Group C and Group D respectively. This is followed by scar tenderness and obstructed labour. In Group A maximum number of patients developed hypotension during 11-20 minutes duration which is 13 (61.9%) followed by 5 (23.8%) patients during first 10 minutes.Conclusions: The study concludes that the combined use of volume preloading to compensate for vasodilatation and vasopressor to counteract arterial dilatation is a very effective method in reducing the incidence, severity and duration of spiral hypotension. The combination group with decreased volume of preload and reduced dose of vasoconstrictor provides better haemodynamic stability when compared to preloading of vasoconstrictors alone.

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of Ondansetron Versus Granisetron to Prevent Perioperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients undergoing Gynaecological Surgery under Spinal Anaesthesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1371
Author(s):  
Robina Makker ◽  
Amit Bhardwaj ◽  
Arwinder Pal Singh ◽  
Asha Anand
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Gynaecological Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Late Postoperative Period

<p><strong>Background</strong>: Posotoprative nausea and vomiting remains a persistent and distressing problem inspite of many advances on perioperative care and anti-emetic drugs. A newer antiemetic drug Granisetron has not been studied in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery under spinal anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Objective</strong>: A randomized double blind study was conducted to compare Ondansetron and Granisetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery under spinal anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods</strong>: 60 consecutive patients, age between 20-65 years, ASA grade I and II undergoing gynaeacologicla surgery under spinal anaesthesia were randomized into two goups of 30 each. One group received intravenous Ondansetron 4.0 mg and the second received intravenous Granisetron 2.0 mg 5 minutes before induction of anaesthesia. For the first 24 hours postoperatively all episodes of nausea and vomiting were recorded. A complete response to the drug was considered if there was no nausea or vomiting and no need for rescue anti-emetic. The observations were tabulated and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: During early postoperative period (0-3 hrs) there was statistically no significant difference in the study groups. Statistically significant difference was found in the study groups in the late postoperative period (3-24 hrs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: In the early postoperative period both Ondansetron and Granisetron are equally effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Granisetron is better than Ondansetron in the late postoperative period of upto 24 hrs.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document