scholarly journals Conservative management of early uncomplicated appendicitis in children

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Kumar Maini ◽  
Neeraj Kumar Jain ◽  
Manjari Goel Jain ◽  
Vicky Khobragade
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis

Background: Right lower abdominal pain management in children is a challenging task for the surgeon. Most of the time right lower abdominal pain ends up in acute appendicitis. For long time appendicetomy was the treatment of choice. However surgical intervention has its own disadvantages such as pain, scarring, adhesions, hernia development and venous thrombosis disease. Anxiety and fear of surgery were also two difficulties in obtaining consent for surgery. Parents often request and insist for medical management. Their unwillingness for surgical intervention was the most important reason for medical management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis.Methods: Our prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, R.K.D.F. Medical College and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India during period of January 2014 to January 2016 and follow up was done till December 2016. Our target group was children under 16 years. A total of 92 children with complaint of right lower abdominal pain attended the hospital for treatment. Routine investigations including ultrasonography of abdomen were performed for all the patients. Out of 92 patients diagnosis of acute appendicitis was made in 74 patients, Surgery was performed in 32 patients, while remaining 42 patients were treated conservatively and the results were analyzed.Results: In this study of 92 patients of pain in right iliac fossa below 16 years, 74 (80.43%) were diagnosed as acute appendicitis. 32 (43.24%) Patients were operated earlier. 42 (56.75%) Patient were treated conservatively. Out of 42 patients, 12 (16.21%) patients were operated within 1 year, 30 (40.54%) Patients didn’t require any surgical intervention during 1 year follow up. In present study, significant role of antibiotic was found in conservative management of acute appendicitis in children. So it can be concluded that conservative management of acute appendicitis in children can be attempted under observation.Conclusions: Antibiotics are both effective and safe as primary treatment for patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Initial antibiotic treatment merits consideration as a primary treatment option for early uncomplicated appendicitis. Appendicectomy should be done but conservative management of acute appendicitis in children can be attempted under observation.

scholarly journals Case-based review: conservative management of appendicitis – are we delaying the inevitable?

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 232-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Davies ◽  
A Peckham-Cooper ◽  
A Sverrisdottir
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Spontaneous Resolution ◽  
Primary Treatment Modality ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽  
Recurrent Appendicitis ◽  
Appendiceal Inflammation ◽  
Surgical Presentation

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical presentation for which surgical intervention, an appendicectomy, has remained a largely unchallenged primary treatment modality. Traditionally, it has been felt that the pathophysiological progressive nature of appendicitis ultimately leads to perforation. A number of recent studies, however, suggest that the process of appendiceal inflammation may follow a more remitting nature with evidence indicating spontaneous resolution. It is hypothesised that the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis may therefore be amenable to conservative management with antibiotics. This article aims to highlight some of the issues and challenges relating to the conservative management of acute appendicitis and further demonstrates potential diagnostic and treatment difficulties involved in managing the more unfamiliar condition of recurrent appendicitis.

scholarly journals Evaluation of conservative management in uncomplicated acute appendicitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vignesh M. ◽  
Rajkumar Chejara ◽  
S. V Arya ◽  
Ankit Bhatia ◽  
Rohit Chaudhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Intravenous Antibiotics ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽  
Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

Background: Appendectomy has been the treatment for acute appendicitis for years based on the understanding that acute appendicitis always leads to perforation and peritonitis. However, there is growing evidence that a significant proportion of patients can be successfully managed with conservative treatment without developing gangrene or perforation. Conservative treatment avoids discomfort, surgery-related morbidities and minimizes treatment cost.Methods: 60 patients taken up for conservative management were evaluated and followed up for 6 months. Study patients received intravenous antibiotics for 2 days. Repeated clinical and TLC monitoring were done. In patients whose clinical condition did not improve, appendectomy was performed. Follow-up at 10 days, 30 days, 3 months and 6 months were carried out to assess recurrence in conservatively managed patients.Results: In this study, the mean age was 25.65 years with a standard deviation of ±8.96 years. The incidence of uncomplicated appendicitis was 63.3% in males and 36.7% in females. Mean Alvarado score was 7.75 with a standard deviation of ±1.20. Failure of conservative management (conversion to appendectomy) was observed in 11.7% of patients and 4 patients (6.6%) had recurrence within 6 months. The overall treatment efficacy was 81.7%.Conclusions: In many cases, first attack of uncomplicated acute appendicitis can be treated successfully by conservative management. Treatment failure on primary admission as well as short-term recurrence up to six months after conservative treatment is low and acceptable. Incidence of complications like perforation and abscess formation are also statistically low.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT VERSUS ULTRASOUND GUIDED ASPIRATION OF SMALL AMOEBIC LIVER ABSCESS

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-171
Author(s):  
Osman Musa ◽  
Mohd Faizan Khan ◽  
Bichitra Nath Shukla ◽  
Nisar Ahmed Ansari ◽  
Brijesh Rathore
Keyword(s):  
Liver Abscess ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Amoebic Liver Abscess ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Chief Complaints ◽  
Right Lobe ◽  
The Right

To compare the outcome of patients undergoing conservative management versus ultrasound guided aspiration of small amoebic liver abscess (=<200ml). This observational prospective study was conducted on 60 patients, aged between 18 to 80 years,After confirming the diagnosis, patients were exposed to medical management or USG guided Aspiration. Patients coming for regular follow-up after completing treatment were included in the study. It was found that the majority of the patients were male (86.7%) and with mean age of the studied patients was 37.10±12.66 years. Chief complaints were pain (100%) followed by fever (85.0%) and Nausea/Vomiting (48.3%) pallor (33.3%), icterus (25.0%) and Tenderness (16.7%). Majority of patients had the right lobe of the liver affected (93.4 %) with Single abscess (94.0%). Duration of Hospital stay and time of half reduction in size was significantly higher in conservative management than the USG guided Aspiration. Reoccurrence of abscess in conservative management was in 6 (20.0%) and need of Surgical intervention was in 4 (13.3%) patients while in USG guided Aspiration group only 1 (3.3%) patient shows Reoccurrence. No mortality was observed in our study. In the present study abscess containing volume of pus (<200 cc) was treated with either conservative treatment or USG guidedAspiration. Our data suggested that the USG guided Aspiration and conservative medical management in treatment ofAmoebic liver abscess are almost equal.

scholarly journals Relative Efficacy of Three of Nonsurgical Treatments for Calcific Tendinitis: Physical Therapy vs Steroid Injection vs Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0021
Author(s):  
Mauricio Drummond ◽  
Caroline Ayinon ◽  
Albert Lin ◽  
Robin Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Calcific Tendinitis ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Calcium Deposits

Objectives: Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder is a painful condition characterized by the presence of calcium deposits within the tendons of the rotator cuff (RTC) that accounts for up to 7% of cases of shoulder pain1. The most common conservative treatments typically include physical therapy (PT), corticosteroid injection (CSI), or ultrasound-guided aspiration (USA). When conservative management fails, the patient may require arthroscopic surgery to remove the calcium with concomitant rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to characterize the failure rates, defined as the need for surgery, of each of these three methods of conservative treatment, as well as to compare post-operative improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) – including subjective shoulder values (SSV) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores – based on the type of pre-operative conservative intervention provided. A secondary aim was to compare post-operative range of motion (ROM) outcomes between groups that failed conservative management. We hypothesized that all preoperative conservative treatments would have equivalent success rates, PROs, and ROM. Bosworth B. Calcium deposits in the shoulder and subacromial bursitis: a survey of 12122 shoulders. JAMA. 1941;116(22):2477-2489. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who were diagnosed with calcific tendinitis at our institution treated among 3 fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons between 2009 and 2019 was performed. VAS, SSV, and ROM in forward flexion (FF) and external rotation (ER) was abstracted from the medical records. Scores were recorded at the initial presentation as well as final post-operative follow-up visit for those who underwent surgery. The conservative treatment method utilized by each patient was recorded and included PT, CSI, or USA. Failure of conservative management was defined as eventual progression to surgical intervention. Statistical analysis included chi-square, independent t test and ANOVA. Descriptive statistics were used to report data. A p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: 239 patients diagnosed with calcific tendinitis were identified in the study period with mean age of 54 years and follow up of at least 6 months. In all, 206 (86.2%) patients underwent a method of conservative treatment. Of these patients, 71/239 (29.7%) underwent PT, 67/239 (28%) attempted CSI, and 68/239 (28.5%) underwent USA. The overall failure rate across all treatment groups was 29.1%, with injections yielding the highest success rate of 54/67 (80.6%). Physical therapy saw the highest failure rate, with 26/71 (36.7%) proceeding to surgical intervention. Patients undergoing physical therapy were statistically more likely to require surgery compared to those undergoing corticosteroid injection (RR 1.88, p= 0.024). Of all 93 patients who underwent surgery, VAS, SSV, ROM improved significantly in all groups. On average, VAS decreased by 4.02 points (6.3 to 2.3), SSV increased by 33 points (51 to 84), FF improved by 13.8º, and ER improved 8.4º between the pre- and post-operative visits (p<0.05). The 33 patients who did not attempt a conservative pre-operative treatment demonstrated the largest post-operative improvement in VAS (-6.00), which was significantly greater than those who previously attempted PT (-3.33, p<0.05). There was a trend towards greater improvement in SSV in the pre-operative PT group (45 to 81) compared to others, but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.47). Range of motion was not significantly affected by the method of pre-operative conservative intervention. Conclusions: Conservative treatment in the form of physical therapy, corticosteroid injection, and ultrasound-guided aspiration is largely successful in managing calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Of these, PT demonstrated the highest rate of failure in terms of requiring surgical management. PRO improvement varied among the conservative modalities used, however patients who did not attempt conservative management experienced the greatest improvements following surgery. If surgery is necessary following failed conservative treatment, excellent outcomes can be expected with significant improvements in ROM and PROs. This information should be considered by the surgeon when deciding whether to recommend conservative treatment for the management of calcific tendinitis, as well as which specific method to employ.

A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY ON ACUTE NON-TRAUMATIC ABDOMINAL EMERGENCIES

2021 ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Md. Quamar Zubair ◽  
A. K. Jha Suman
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Accurate Diagnosis ◽  
Postoperative Patient ◽  
Correct Treatment ◽  
Abdominal Emergencies ◽  
Comprehensive Study

Abdominal pain is one of the most common reasons for visit to the emergency room. Acute appendicitis is the commonest cause. An accurate diagnosis is essential for the correct treatment, which in many cases will prevent the death of the patient. Mainstay of diagnosis is history and physical examination. If this information is inadequate to establish a diagnosis and urgent or immediate operation is unnecessary, the periodic re-examination helps document the progression of the disease and often avoids unnecessary surgical intervention. Today the combination of improved diagnostic procedures, antibiotic and better anaesthesia and preoperative and postoperative patient care has led to a decrease in morbidity and mortality of patients with acute abdomen. The objective of this study was to determine the various causes of nontraumatic acute abdominal emergencies, their incidence, management and mortality in both sexes and all age groups >12 years age.

scholarly journals Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: An Under-Recognized Cause of Chronic Abdominal Pain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tulika Chatterjee ◽  
Johnathon Stephens ◽  
Moni Roy
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Chronic Abdominal Pain ◽  
Segmental Arterial Mediolysis ◽  
The Past ◽  
Missed Diagnosis ◽  
Abdominal Arteries

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a non-inflammatory, non-atherosclerotic vasculopathy mostly involving the abdominal arteries. SAM was recently recognized as a more prevalent aetiology of abdominal pain than initially thought by healthcare providers. It is still a commonly missed diagnosis in patients with recurrent emergency room (ER) visits for abdominal pain. Most published case reports in the past have highlighted catastrophic sequelae such as intra-abdominal haemorrhage requiring surgical intervention. We report a case of SAM where the diagnosis was initially missed. After diagnosis, conservative medical management was offered which led to clinical improvement.

scholarly journals Clinico-pathological and etiological evaluation of acute appendicitis and assessment of significance of laboratory and ultrasonography examination as an ancillary aid to clinical diagnosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1954
Author(s):  
Sailendra Nath Paul ◽  
Dilip Kumar Das
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Operative Findings

Background: Timely diagnosis and intervention of acute appendicitis reduces morbidity and mortality associated with the disease condition. The study aimed to evaluate the etiology of acute appendicitis, to analyze the sensitivity of modified Alvarado scoring system and radiology in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to correlate the observations of laboratory tests, operative findings with the histopathological report of specimen of appendix.Methods: This was a prospective study done on 100 patients with clinical symptoms of acute right lower abdominal pain suggestive of appendicular origin during the period from February 2015 to January 2016 in the department of surgery thorough clinical assessment, laboratory investigations, ultrasound findings as were done for all patients. After confirming the diagnosis of AA the patients had operative intervention and specimens were sent for histopathological study.Results: Male preponderance was seen in the study. Majority of them belongs to 21 to 30 years age group (50%). Faecolith was the most common etiological factor observed (58%). Abdominal pain (100%) was the most common clinical symptom. Alvarado score had sensitivity of 95.74% and specificity of 66.67% in diagnosing AA. In correlation to histopathological findings, ultrasonography findings showed 100% positive visualization rate in all 71 cases. Elevated ESR (94%) had high diagnostic accuracy as confirmed by HPE finding (96.81%) which is statistically significant (p<0.000).Conclusions: Alvarado scoring system, elevated ESR levels and USG findings of the appendix can be considered as adjuncts to clinically diagnose the AA, to improve the diagnostic accuracy thereby consequently the rate of negative appendicectomy can be reduced and thus decreases the complication rates.

A propensity-adjusted comparison of middle meningeal artery embolization versus conventional therapy for chronic subdural hematomas

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Joshua S. Catapano ◽  
Andrew F. Ducruet ◽  
Candice L. Nguyen ◽  
Tyler S. Cole ◽  
Jacob F. Baranoski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Middle Meningeal Artery ◽  
Adjusted Analysis ◽  
Subdural Hematomas ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Meningeal Artery

OBJECTIVEMiddle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is a promising treatment strategy for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). However, studies comparing MMA embolization and conventional therapy (surgical intervention and conservative management) are limited. The authors aimed to compare MMA embolization versus conventional therapy for cSDHs using a propensity-adjusted analysis.METHODSA retrospective study of all patients with cSDH who presented to a large tertiary center over a 2-year period was performed. MMA embolization was compared with surgical intervention and conservative management. Neurological outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). A propensity-adjusted analysis compared MMA embolization versus surgery and conservative management for all individual cSDHs. Primary outcomes included change in hematoma diameter, treatment failure, and complete resolution at last follow-up.RESULTSA total of 231 patients with cSDH met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 35 (15%) were treated using MMA embolization, and 196 (85%) were treated with conventional treatment. On the latest follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in the percentage of patients with worsening mRS scores. Of the 323 total cSDHs found in 231 patients, 41 (13%) were treated with MMA embolization, 159 (49%) were treated conservatively, and 123 (38%) were treated with surgical evacuation. After propensity adjustment, both surgery (OR 12, 95% CI 1.5–90; p = 0.02) and conservative therapy (OR 13, 95% CI 1.7–99; p = 0.01) were predictors of treatment failure and incomplete resolution on follow-up imaging (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.8–13; p < 0.001 and OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.5–12; p < 0.001, respectively) when compared with MMA embolization. Additionally, MMA embolization was associated with a significant decrease in cSDH diameter on follow-up relative to conservative management (mean −8.3 mm, 95% CI −10.4 to −6.3 mm, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSThis propensity-adjusted analysis suggests that MMA embolization for cSDH is associated with a greater extent of hematoma volume reduction with fewer treatment failures than conventional therapy.

Midthoracic Punctate Midline Myelotomy for Treatment of Chronic, Intractable, Nonmalignant, Abdominal Visceral Pain: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. E183-E183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Ball ◽  
Zaid Aljuboori ◽  
Haring Nauta
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Physical Examination ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Complete Relief ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Punctate midline myelotomy (PMM) is a surgical procedure that damages the ascending fibers of the postsynaptic dorsal column (PSDC) pathway to interrupt visceral pain transmission.1-3 It can offer relief to patients with chronic visceral pain conditions that are refractory to other treatments. Here, we present a surgical video of midthoracic PMM in a patient with chronic, intractable, nonmalignant visceral abdominal pain that failed over a decade of medical treatment. We choose T7-8 as the level for laminectomy in patients with pelvic or lower abdominal pain, because the postsynaptic pain fibers transmitting visceral pain sensation from the lower abdominal organs will invariably be caudal to this level. The patient developed immediate and complete relief of her visceral pain after the procedure, which was sustained through the 11-wk follow-up period to date and was able to be weaned off narcotics. Postoperatively, she remained full strength and had no impairment of light touch or proprioception of her lower extremities. Detailed physical examination showed a reduced vibratory sensation on the glabrous skin of her great toes. Regarding patient-reported sensory changes (not detected on physical examination), she reported some numbness on the insides of her feet that had resolved by 11-wk follow-up. She also reported some numbness of the vulva, but not of the vagina. However, by 11-wk follow-up, she reported this had resolved and she had normal sexual function. The only persistent sensation at 11-wk follow-up was slight tingling in her toes that was not bothersome to her.4 The patient presented in the following video consented to both the surgical procedure and the publication of her clinical history and operative video.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document