scholarly journals A randomised prospective comparative study of evaluation of dexmedetomidine an adjuvant to ropivacaine for ultrasound guided supraclavicular block

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
V. S. S. N. Murthy ◽  
N. Hari Kiran Verma ◽  
Anand Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group B ◽  
Supraclavicular Block ◽  
Other Regarding

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> There are clinical evidences for efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic for peripheral nerve block, but very few published study are available on continuation of dexmedetomidine, with ropivacaine for ultrasound guided supraclavicular block. The present study has been designed to elucidate the effect of dexmedetomidine, in combination ropivacaine on various parameters.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> During period of 2 year and 3 months 84 patients were enrolled for this study. Patient in Group A were received 15 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine with 100 microgram one ml dexmedetomidine and Group B were received 15ml of 0.5% of ropivacaine with 1 ml of normal saline. Drug solution was prepared by same individual and was not part of study.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Both the group were comparable to each other regarding demography profile. The duration of sensory block 644.96±72.4 min in group A and the duration of sensory block in Group B was 731.53±131.54 min with p value 0.00354. The duration of motor block was 661.5±29.25 in group A and 559.77±29.25 in Group B with P value 0.0001. Duration of analgesia in Group A was 457.06±34.47 min and it was 345.70±38.032 min in Group B. The supplementation of intravenous opioid was required in 3 patients in Group A and 10 patients in group B with P value 0.037.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When 100 microgram of dexmedetomidine was added as an adjuvant to ropivacaine is associated with early onset of sensory and motor block, prolongation of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia in comparison with ropivacaine alone.</p>

scholarly journals Comparison of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Butorphanol as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% in Infraumbilical Surgeries- A Randomised Double Blind Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandip Roy Basunia ◽  
Prosenjit Mukherjee ◽  
Md Bakir Hossain Munshi
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Neuraxial opioids are widely used as adjuvants to local anaesthetic as they improve quality and duration of block. Neuraxial opioids like Butorphanol and Fentanyl allow prolonged analgesia in the postoperative period and faster recovery from spinal anaesthesia. Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of Butorphanol and Fentanyl combined with bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in infraumbilical surgeries. Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomised controlled trial in which 110, ASA I and II patients of either sex who underwent elective infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were selected. Patients were allocated randomly into two groups A (n=55) and B (n=55). Group A (F) received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (3 mL) with fentanyl 25 microgram (0.5 mL) to make it total 3.5 mL. Group B (B) received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (3 mL) with butorphanol 250 microgram (0.25 mL) and Normal Saline (NS) 0.25 mL to make it total 3.5 mL. Heart Rate (HR), Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP, DBP), two segment regression time of sensory block, motor block were assessed at preset intervals. Chi-square test or Fischer’s-exact test were used and a p-value ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Mean of two segment sensory regression time of Group A was 41.94±1.73 minutes and Group B was 50.56±4.43 minutes (p<0.0001). Time to onset of motor block in Group A was 5.28±.32 minutes and Group B was 5.27±.32 minutes (p=0.96). Mean duration of motor block in Group A was 81.23±4.87 minutes and Group B was 109.83±2.61 minutes (p<0.0001). Time to rescue analgesic was 289.27±7.37 minutes in Group A and 378.41±10.25 minutes in Group B (p<0.0001). HR, SBP and DBP were comparable among the groups. Conclusion: Intrathecal bupivacaine-butorphanol mixture was clinically better as it provided longer duration of analgesia with lesser incidences of pruritus and nausea/vomiting compared to intrathecal fentanyl-bupivacaine mixture.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Efficacy of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine As An Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Vis-À-Vis Onset of Surgical Anaesthesia and Duration of Effect in Upper Limb Surgeries

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 513
Author(s):  
Sandeep Dubey ◽  
Rukhsana Najeeb ◽  
Arshid Ahmad Sofi
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Supraclavicular block is a safe, reliable and cost effective technique of providing anesthesia for the upper limb surgeries. Objectives:  To evaluate the effect of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to Ropivacaine in ultrasound guided supraclavicular block in upper limb surgeries with respect to: Onset of sensory and motor block, Duration of sensory and motor block, Quality of block and Duration of post-operative analgesia. Materials and methods: The purpose of present study was to compare the effect of addition of clonidine 1mcg/kg vs dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg to 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. A total of 90 patients of ASA I and II, aged 18-60 years, of either gender, undergoing upper limb surgery were allocated to three groups. Each group consisted of 30 patients. They received drugs as under: Group-A (dexmedetomidine group) received 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 1μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. Group-B (clonidine group) received 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 1mcg/kg clonidine. Group-C (placebo group) received 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 2 ml normal saline. Results: Onset of sensory block was faster in Group-A as compared to Group-B and Group-C. The difference was statistically significant (p-value<0.05). Onset of motor block was faster in Group-A as compared to Group-B and Group C. The difference was statistically significant (p-value<0.05). Patients of Group-A had significantly longer duration of sensory and motor block when compared with Group-B and Group-C (p-value<0.05). Duration of post-operative analgesia was significantly longer in Group-A as compared to Group-B and Group-C (p-value<0.05). Quality of block was significantly better in Group-A as compared to Group-B and Group-C (p-value<0.05). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block, duration of postoperative analgesia and improves the quality of block much more as compared to clonidine when used as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

COMPARISON BETWEEN PERINEURAL DEXAMETHASONE AND INTRAVENOUS MAGNESIUM SULPHATE AS ADJUVANT IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BLOCK

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Nagah El-Shaer ◽  
Ahmed Kamal Mohamed Ali ◽  
Farouk Kamal Eldeen Abd El-Aziz ◽  
Mostafa Samir El-Sayed
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Magnesium Sulphate ◽  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract   Background: Upper extremity surgeries are commonly performed under regional anaesthesia. Regional anaesthesia of the upper extremity has several advantages over general anaesthesia such as improved postoperative pain management, decreased postoperative narcotic consumption, and reduced recovery time. Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare between dexamethasone and magnesium sulphate as adjuvants in supraclavicular brachial plexus block as regards the onset and duration of sensory and motor block as well as side effects. Patients and Methods: This prospective double-blinded comparative study was carried out in Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University Hospital on 120 adult patients between 21-50 years of both sexes with ASA classification 1&2 who were scheduled for elective upper limb orthopaedic surgeries. A written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Every patient received an explanation about the purpose of the study. Procedures had been approved by the institutional and the regional ethical committee. Total 120 patients are enrolled in the study and divided into 3 groups A and B and C (40 for each one). Results From aspect of increasing the duration of sensory &motor block magnesium sulphate group (group A) showed higher prolongation of sensory & motor block with recovery of pin prick sensation in median time 313 mins ± when compared with group B &C even with longer time taken for patient to request rescue analgesia after 5 hours. In group (B) by adding dexamethasone with bupivacaine the blood pressure rate are increased after 20 min of injection and return normal after 240 min, heart rate are normal, but in case of sensory and motor block about 77.5% of study patient in this group have full motor and sensory block, in case of increasing time of motor and sensory block the dexamethasone success increasing time for motor and sensory block to reach 278 min sensory and 314 min in motor block, first call of Analgesic are after 4 hr. Conclusion: Group A (Magnesium sulphate with bupivacaine) were more effective and increasing affected time in motor and sensory block than Group B (Dexamethasone with Bupivacaine) and Group C (Control).

scholarly journals Articaine and Dexmedetomidine – supplemented Articaine for arteriovenous fistula creation under ultrasound- guided supraclavicular block

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Halim Armanious ◽  
Gamal Adel Abd el Hameed
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Hemodialysis Fistula ◽  
Group A ◽  
Supraclavicular Block

Abstract Background: Articaine has emerged as local anesthetic, that produce sensory and motor blockade shorter than bupivacaine and lower in neurotoxicity than lidocaine. Studies have shown that adding dexmedetomidine to local anesthetic produce prolongation of sensory and motor bock duration. Early regain of motor power with adequate analgesia is needed in hemodialysis fistula creation, for early start of physiotherapy. We designed this study to test efficacy of adding dexmedetomidine to Articaine on the duration of sensory and motor block. Methods: After university review board approval, informed written consent to participate in the study was obtained. Patients with chronic renal failure undergoing radiocephalic hemodialysis fistula creation were eligible for enrollment in this double blind, randomized trial. Patients receive either 40 ml of 2% Articaine hydrochloride or 40 ml of Articaine 2% mixed with dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg). sensory block duration in minutes is assessed by pinprick test and motor block duration in minutes is tested by Bromage scale, both are recorded as a primary outcome. Secondary outcome included onset of sensory and motor block, time for rescue analgesia, hemodynamic changes, over sedation and possible side effect all were recorded. Results: fifty patients were enrolled in the study (25 in Articaine group A and 25 in Articaine dexmedetomidine group AD). Longer sensory block duration was in group AD (230 to 260 min) than in group A (172 to 185min) with p <0.001. Also, motor block duration was significantly longer in group AD 220±110min than in group A 165±45. The duration of effective analgesia was significantly longer in group AD (363 ± 134 min) versus (244 ± 84) min in group A. The onset of block was short and similar between groups. In group AD one patient didn’t ask for analgesia in 24 h postoperative and another patient showed excessive somnolence. There was no other difference in both groups. Conclusion : The addition of dexmedetomidine to Articaine during ultrasound guided supraclavicular block increase duration of sensory and motor block and prolong time of first analgesia required. Although we didn’t detect significant reduction in onset time of block. Further study is needed with larger sample size.

scholarly journals A comparative study between the effect of verapamil versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant in supraclavicular brachial plexus block

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ibrahim Khamis ◽  
Ahmed Saeed Mohamed ◽  
Hesham Mohamed El Azazy ◽  
Hala Salah El Ozairy ◽  
Mohamed Moien Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Abstract Background Brachial plexus block has substituted general anesthesia in the majority of patients planned for upper limb surgeries as it avoids the undesired effects of the medications used in general anesthesia as well as the stress response associated with airway manipulation. Opioid agonist–antagonists such as nalbuphine are used as adjuvant to improve the anesthetic properties of bupivacaine. Verapamil has an additive effect in brachial plexus blockade in the form of decreasing the consumption of analgesics in the postoperative period with reducing onset time and extending the duration of motor and sensory blockade. The aim of this study is to investigate the adjuvant effect of verapamil versus nalbuphine to 0.5% bupivacaine in brachial plexus block as regards onset, duration of sensory and motor blockade and postoperative analgesic augmentation. The study is randomized, prospective, double-blinded, comparative study where 90 patients subjected to arm, forearm and hand surgeries were randomized into three groups, group A received 30 ml of plain bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml of normal saline, group B received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml verapamil equivalent to 5 mg, group C received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 10 mg of nalbuphine diluted in 2 ml of normal saline. Results Results of this study showed that group C and group B sensory block time onset was 7.25 ± 1.5 vs. 10.92 ± 3.84 min, P < 0.001 and was shorter than that in group A (13.2 ± 2.66 min). In addition, the motor block onset was (11.10 ± 1.24 vs. 13.50 ± 3.77 min, P < 0.001) shorter than group A (17.16 ± 1.30 min). In group C and group B, sensory block duration was 396 ± 32.17 vs. 355.83 ± 18.48 min, P < 0.001, respectively and was longer than that in group A (321.13 ± 25.08 min). Also, there was prolonged motor block duration in group C and group B recording (338.92 ± 25.2 vs. 302.93 ± 15.24 min, P < 0.001) and was longer than that in group A (280.70 ± 32.35 min). Time of demand of rescue analgesia dose was significantly long in group C and group B (449.53 ± 52.45 vs. 418.13 ± 41.12 min, P < 0.001) and was longer than group A (361.31 ± 21.42 min). Both verapamil and nalbuphine have additive effect to bupivacaine improving the all anesthetic parameters of the block. Conclusion Both drugs produce favorable enhancement of time onset and effective prolongation of duration of sensory and motor blockade and extend the period of postoperative analgesia with superiority to nalbuphine over verapamil.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLONIDINE VERSUS NALBUPHINE AS INTRATHECAL ADJUVANTS TO 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE DURING LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES – A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND INTERVENTIONAL STUDY.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trishala Jain ◽  
Jaipal .
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Institutional Ethics ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

Background: Regional anesthesia techniques for gynecological procedures are on increasing trends due to their advantage of postoperative analgesia owing to intrathecal adjuvants. The present study was aimed to comparatively evaluate the clinical efficacy of clonidine with nalbuphine when co-administered intrathecally with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for Lower abdominal surgeries in Gynecology. Methods: With institutional ethics committee clearance No. 193MC/EC/2018, randomized, double blind study was conducted. After obtaining informed written consent total of 84 patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (n=42) - Inj.  3.5 ml Bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml Clonidine(30µg) intrathecally.  Group B (n=42) - Inj.3.5 ml Bupivacaine 0.5%+0.2 ml Nalbuphine(2mg) intrathecally. The characteristics of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic data, side effects were recorded. Results: The onset of sensory block was earlier in Group B than Group A (3.08±0.52 min vs 4.00±0.54 min, p<0.001 ). The onset of motor block was also earlier in Group B than Group A (7.78±0.80 min vs 8.80±0.95min, p<0.001). The time to first rescue analgesia in patients receiving intrathecal clonidine was significantly delayed than patients receiving intrathecal nalbuphine (284.95 ± 12.93 min vs 211.52 ± 15.92 min, p<0.001). Introperative hemodynamic changes were comparable and none of the patient suffered from respiratory depression except very little cases of shivering which are not significant. Conclusions: Intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine provided was clinically more effective than nalbuphine for prolonging the duration of analgesia for gynecological procedures. Keywords: Bupivacaine, Clonidine, Lower abdominal surgeries in gynecology, Nalbuphine, Subarachnoid block.

scholarly journals Comparison of two different doses dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in sub-arachnoid block for abdominal hysterectomies. A randomized double blinded study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-63
Author(s):  
R Krishna Prabhu ◽  
A Radhakrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Different Doses

Background: Abdominal hysterectomy is often a long duration procedure and warrants intense pain relief in the post-operative period. Dexmedetomidine when added to bupivacaine in subarachnoid block prolongs the duration of surgical anaesthesia, decreases blood loss and prolongs duration of post-operative pain relief. Aims and Objective: To compare two different doses dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in sub-arachnoid block in abdominal hysterectomy surgeries. Materials and Methods: 60 patients of age group 30-60 years posted for elective abdominal hysterectomies under American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification I or II were randomly allocated into 2 groups of 30 each. Group A received 5 micrograms (μg) of dexmedetomidine along with 3.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine in sub-arachnoid block. Group B received 10 μg of dexmedetomidine along with 3.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine in sub-arachnoid block. Changes in blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, ephedrine consumption, blood loss, duration of sensory block, duration of motor block, duration of analgesia were compared between two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in change in heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, duration of sensory block, duration of motor block between two groups. Patients in group B had significant decrease in blood pressure, blood loss and significant increase in ephedrine consumption compared to Group A. The duration of analgesia was also prolonged in group B compared to Group A. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine in dose of 10 μg is a better adjuvant to bupivacaine for abdominal hysterectomy surgeries.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.8(2) 2017 59-63

A COMPARISON BETWEEN INTRATHECAL NALBUPHINE VERSUS FENTANYL AS AN ADJUVANT WITH 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER SEGMENT CESAREAN SECTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukesh Choudhary ◽  
Neeti Mahla
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthesia for cesarean section, being simple to perform and economical with rapid onset. This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesia of intrathecal nalbuphine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine in cesarean section. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double?blind, and comparative study was conducted on 120 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II. These patients were randomized into three groups with fifty patients in each group. Group A received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) plus 0.4 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg), Group B received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) plus 0.4 ml fentanyl (20 ?g), and Group B received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) plus 0.4 ml of normal saline. Results: The mean duration of sensory block was 107.32 ± 5.36 min in Group A, 111.23 ± 4.23 min in Group B, and 85.69 ± 2.31 min in Group C. The mean duration of motor block (time required for motor block to return to Bromage’s Grade 1 from the time of onset of motor block) was 152.02 ± 3.12 min in Group A, 151.69± 2.36 min in Group B, and 122.12 ± 2.32 min in Group C. Conclusion: We concluded that intrathecal nalbuphine prolongs postoperative analgesia maximally and may be used as an alternative to intrathecal fentanyl in cesarean section. Keywords: Nalbuphine, Bupivacaine, Fentanyl.

COMPARISON OF THE ONSET OF SENSORY BLOCK USING LIDOCAINE 1.5% WITH ADRENALINE OR LIDOCAINE 1.5% WITH ADRENALINE AND DEXAMETHASONE IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED AXILLARY NERVE BLOCK FOR BELOW ELBOW SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 2337-2339
Author(s):  
Nabaa Adnan Ahmed ◽  
Alaa Hussein Altaei ◽  
Mohammed Adel Jasim
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group B

The aim: To demonstrate the onset of dexamethasone when added to lidocaine in ultrasound regional axillary brachial block. Materials and methods: 30 patients participated in this study in Al-wasity hospital from June 1st to December 1st 2019; all were of ASA I-II type, aged 18-65 years old. All patients were scheduled for upper limb below elbow surgery with peripheral nerve block. They were divided randomly in to 2 groups: Group A: received 20 ml of lidocaine 1.5% with adrenaline 1:200000; Group 2 : received 20 ml of lidocaine with adrenaline and dexamethasone 8 mg. There was no significant differences among the groups regarding the change in pulse rate, MAP and Oxygen saturation. The group B was faster than group A (p value < 0.001) in both the time of cold sensory block onset and pinprick sensory block onset at all dermatome (C5,C6,C7,C8,T1). Results: A variety of adjuvants have been used with peripheral nerve block to decrease the onset time, improve block quality, and prolong analgesia. Steroids have been shown to be beneficial in improving block onset. Conclusions: Adding dexamethasone to lidocaine enhanced the onset time of the block with no hemodynamic effect.

scholarly journals Comparison of Bier's block with Lidocaine versus Lidocaine plus Verapamil

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
S Tabdar ◽  
S Lama ◽  
ER Kadariya
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
P Value ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: General anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia both are used for upper extremity surgeries. Bier’s Blockusing local anaesthetic alone or in combination with other adjuvants provides effective analgesia intraoperatively as wellas postoperatively with fewer complications as compared to general anaesthesia.Objective: This study was designed to compare effectiveness, haemodynamic alterations and total duration of analgesiawith Lidocaine versus Lidocaine plus Verapamil in Bier’s Block.Methods: This is a prospective randomised double blind trial conducted in Kathmandu Medical College TeachingHospital from February 2012 to December 2012 after approval from the ethical committee and informed consent fromthe participants. Total 40 adult patients of age 20 to 50 years, weight 50 to 70 kg, of both gender, belonging to AmericanSociety of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status I and II undergoing elective distal upper extrimity surgery lasting at one toone and half hours with Bier’s Block were included in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups of twentyeach to receive either 40 ml of 0.5% Lidocaine alone (Group A) or 40 ml of 0.5% Lidocaine plus 2.5 mg Verapamil (GroupB). The two groups were compared in terms of onset and recovery from sensory and motor blockade, tourniquet paintolerance time, duration of analgesia, alteration of haemodynamics and major side effects. Data analysis was done byMicrosoft Offi ce Excel 2007 [Polystat, Microsoft Offi ce Excel worksheet.XLS] using student’s two tailed t test. Categoricalparamatres were tested by Fisher Exact test and p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically signifi cant.Result: Onset of sensory blockade was faster in group B (Mean± SD: 3.07± 0.25 minutes) as compared to group A (Mean±SD: 5.59 ± 0.41 minutes). The onset of motor block in group B was 10.4 ± 0.77 minutes versus 13.17 ± 1.45 minutes ingroup A. Recovery of sensory block in group B occurred at 29.95 ± 6.96 minutes versus 11.45 ± 2.16 minutes in groupA. Similarly recovery of motor block in group B occurred in 13.6 ± 1.79 minutes versus 7.65 ± 1.04 minutes in group A.Tolerance of fi rst tourniquet pain in group B was long 41.15 ± 3.82 minutes versus 22.00 ± 2.9) minutes in group A. Secondtourniquet pain tolerance time was again longer (48.25 ± 3.96 minutes) in group B versus 28.05 ± 4.84 minutes in groupA. Total duration of analgesia was more in group B (207.25 ± 21.1 minutes) versus 32.2 ± 5.78 minutes in group A. Totalconsumption of analgesic (Tramadol) in 24 hours in group B was lesser than group A (47.5 ± 38.0 mg versus 112.5 ± 35.8mg). All these differences were signifi cant statistically (p value <0.05). Both of the groups showed stable haemodynamicparameters intraoperatively as well as postoperatively without any signifi cant adverse effects.Conclusion: Addition of Verapamil to Lidocaine was more effective than Lidocaine alone in Bier’s block.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v2i1.10513Journal of Kathmandu Medical College, Vol. 2, No. 1, Issue 3, Jan.-Mar., 2013, Page: 12-17

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document