scholarly journals Assessment of functional mobility and body mass index among patients with a total knee replacement: a retrospective study in Indian population

Author(s):  
Nagendra Gowtham Rayudu Yelamarthi ◽  
Raghu Yelavarthi ◽  
Rajashekhar Tati

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Obesity is associated with an increased risk of osteoarthritis, and the incidence of obese patients requiring a total knee replacement (TKR) has increased in recent years. A high body mass index (BMI) may influence post‐TKR rehabilitation outcomes. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of obesity on functional mobility outcomes following post‐TKR rehabilitation in Asian patients where BMI was not as high as those reported in similar studies performed other countries other than Asian.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A total of 100 patients were categorized as normal weight (n=11), overweight (n=10), class I obese (n=28), or class II obese (n=32), class III obese (n=19). Patients were retrospectively followed up for 6 months after undergoing TKR followed by 2 months of active rehabilitation. Outcome measures were recorded at baseline and at the 2‐month and 6‐month follow-up assessments and included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the following tests: functional reach, single‐leg stance, ten‐meter walk, timed up and go, chair rise, and stair climbing.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> A 4×3 (group×time) repeated‐measures analysis of variance showed significant improvement in all of the outcome measures for all of the BMI groups at the 2‐month and 6‐month follow-up assessments (p&lt;0.05 for all). No significant intergroup differences at the 2‐month and 6‐month follow-up assessments were observed for any of the mobility measures except the functional reach and single‐leg stance (p&lt;0.05).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Patients with class II/III obesity benefit from early post‐TKR outpatient rehabilitation and respond well. Also, the patients with lower BMIs showed significant improvements and patients with a high BMI might require additional balance-based exercises in their post-TKR rehabilitation protocols.</p>

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahsan Butt ◽  
Muhammad Zain-ur-Rehman ◽  
Adeel Nawab ◽  
Ahmad Hafeez ◽  
Ali Amjad

Abstract Introduction: Total knee replacement is a reliable operation for reducing pain and improving function in severe osteoarthritis of the knee. As incidence of obesity is increasing worldwide, there is a debate about the role of Body Mass Index (BMI) in selection of patients requiring total knee replacement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index on total knee replacement in terms of post-operative improvement in knee range of motion, patient satisfaction and complications.Material and methods: Out of 175 patients who suffered from advance knee osteoarthritis and were candidates for primary total knee replacement from January 2016 to March 2018, 155 patients fit the inclusion criteria. Group 1 included 66 patients who were overweight and class 1 obese while group 2 included 89 patients who were class 2 and 3 obese according to WHO Body Mass Index classification. All patients underwent total knee replacement according to the hospital guidelines. Pre and post-operative range of motion, patient satisfaction and complications were assessed and documented. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in improvements in post-operative knee range of motion between the two groups up to 2 years of follow up. [Mann-Whitney U test p= 0.069]. Similarly, Mann-Whitney U test showed that there is no significant difference between patient satisfaction levels (SF-12 scores) of the two groups (p= 0.09). Conclusion: There is no significant impact of obesity on outcomes after total knee replacement and BMI should not be used as a factor in selecting patients who qualify for total knee replacement.Level of Evidence: Level III


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e59079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Baker ◽  
Karthikeyan Muthumayandi ◽  
Craig Gerrand ◽  
Benjamin Kleim ◽  
Karen Bettinson ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Spicer ◽  
D. Pomeroy ◽  
W. Badenhausen ◽  
Jr L. Schaper ◽  
J. Curry ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 41-43
Author(s):  
Dr. Seelam Narasimha Reddy ◽  
Dr. Buggaveeti Goutham ◽  
Dr. Yadlapalli Venkatesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 548-552
Author(s):  
Dr. Buggaveeti Goutham ◽  
Dr. Madhukar Reddy Vanga ◽  
Dr. Sivaram Sidda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document