Study to evaluate correlation between immediate fetal outcome, cord blood pH and causes of fetal distress in low risk patients undergoing emergency caesarean section

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-341
Author(s):  
Varuna Pathak ◽  
◽  
Deepshikha Sahu ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Blood Ph ◽  
Risk Patients

Chikungunya–dengue co-infection during pregnancy requiring preterm Caesarean section: first case report from Bangladesh

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdur Rahim ◽  
Shahana Zaman ◽  
Nasreen Sultana ◽  
Ariful Islam ◽  
Khwaja Nazim Uddin
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
First Case

We report the first case of chikungunya-dengue co-infection during pregnancy requiring emergency Caesarean section (CS) because of fetal distress in a Bangladeshi primigravida. Though previously unreported, this situation may become increasingly common.

scholarly journals Elective versus emergency caesarean section: differences in maternal outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3207
Author(s):  
Anshu Sharma ◽  
Rajiv Acharya ◽  
Yashika Pehal ◽  
Bhawna Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Maternal Outcome ◽  
Common Indication ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Caesarean section is a life-saving surgical procedure when certain complications arise during pregnancy or labour. The use of CS worldwide has increased worldwide unprecedented levels although the gap between higher- and lower-resource settings remains. The present study evaluates the difference in maternal outcome in elective versus emergency caesarean sections in our institute.Methods: The study included first 65 cases of emergency caesarean section (group A) and during the study period, first 65 elective caesarean section (group B) if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Various intra operative and postoperative events were recorded which included intra operative complications, postpartum haemorrhage and transfusion indices.Results: The most common indication of caesarean section in group A was fetal distress (27.7%). In group B most caesarean sections were classified under 5 followed by class 6, the most common indication being previous caesarean section (27.6%). It was observed that pre-operative mean haemoglobin in group A was 10.6 g/dl and in group B was 11.2g/dl. A drop of 1.36 g/dl in group A and 1.10 g/dl in group B was observed in the post-op period. Cross match / transfusion ratio 1.5 in group A and  2 in group B, transfusion probability ratio was 60 % in group A and  66.7%  in group B and transfusion index was 1 in group A and  group B. There was significantly higher contraception acceptance in group B compared to group A.Conclusions: Elective caesarean section has more favourable maternal outcome as compared to emergency caesarean section as the former is done under controlled and planned circumstances.  However, there should be stringent audit to scrutinise indication of caesarean section, outcome of caesarean and blood transfusion practices.

scholarly journals Maternal and Fetal Outcome in Emergency versus Elective Caesarean Section

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-189
Author(s):  
Naveen Darnal ◽  
Ganesh Dangal
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
P Value ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Common Indication ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Emergency Cesarean

Background: Caesarean section is one of the most performed surgical procedures all over the world. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality as compared to vaginal delivery. The present study was carried out to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcome and complications in two groups of pregnant women who underwent elective and emergency cesarean section, so that measures can be taken to reduce morbidity and mortality in near future.Methods: It was hospital based descriptive cross-sectional study carried out at Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital from October to December 2018. There were 340 patients enrolled in the study 170 in elective and 170 in emergency caesareans selected randomly. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board and informed consent was taken from the patients and patients’ guardians. Data were collected daily from the Operation Theater. Results: The rate of caesarean section in the hospital was 30.7%. Proportion of emergency caesarean section was 1324 (74.4%) and elective caesarean section was 456 (25.6%). Emergency Caesarean section was more common in younger age group and in primigravida while elective Caesarean section was more common in advanced age group and in multigravida. The most common indication for emergency Caesarean section was Fetal Distress and the most common indication for elective Caesarean section was previous cesarean with refused vaginal delivery after cesarean section. The maternal outcome in terms of post-operative wound infection, (post-partum hemorrhage, urinary tract infection need for blood transfusion, fever and need for maternal intensive care unit admission was significantly (p- value <0.05) higher in emergency Caesarean section than in elective Caesarean section .The fetal outcome in terms of birth asphyxia, meconium stained liquor and need for Neonatal ICU admission were significantly (p – value <0.05) higher in emergency Caesarean section than in elective Caesarean section. Conclusions: Maternal and fetal complications were significantly higher in the emergency caesarean section as compared to elective caesarean section group.Keywords: Fetal outcome; emergency cesarean section; elective cesarean section; maternal outcome.

scholarly journals Decision-Delivery Interval for Emergency Caesarean Section at the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
S. Eli ◽  
D. G. B. Kalio ◽  
A. Dan- Jumbo ◽  
J. Ikimalo
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
State University ◽  
Cephalopelvic Disproportion ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Rivers State

Decision-Delivery interval when carrying out emergency caesarean section (EmCS) cannot be over-emphasized especially with regards to maternal and fetal outcome. There are variety of factors that may contribute to these intervals such as logistics, personal delay, delay in obtaining of informed consent, lack of blood, and availability of theatre space. Aim: To determine the decision-delivery interval and causes of delay in EmCS at the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital (RSUTH). Methods: It was prospective study conducted at the RSUTH between July 1, 2018 to January 31, 2019. Information was obtained using a self structured questionnaire and analyzed using version SPSS 25. Results: There were 481 patients admitted into labour ward for the period under review of which 71(14.8 %) had EmCS. The mean age was 31 years. The commonest indication for EmCS was Cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) represented by 23 (32.4%) of the subjects. The average time for decision - delivery interval was 1 to 2 hours represented by 29 (40.8%). The shortest decision - delivery interval was less than 30 minutes 1(1.3%).The decision – delivery interval time greater than 5 hours were 9 (12.7%). The 3 commonest reasons for delay with respect to average decision – delivery intervals were personal delay 21 (20.8%), logistics 19 (18.8%) and lack of blood 13 (12.9%). Conclusion: The study revealed that the average decision - delivery interval was 1 – 2 hours represented by 40.5% of the subjects. This was relatively long when compared to developed countries of the world. The commonest reason for delay in carrying out EmCS was personal delay (20.8%). The commonest indication for EmCS was CPD (32.4%). Addressing the reasons for the decision – delivery interval will help improve our practice and reduce adverse effects to mother and baby.

scholarly journals Extreme Maternal Metabolic Acidosis Leading to Fetal Distress and Emergency Caesarean Section

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Cecere ◽  
Corinne Hubinont ◽  
Arnauld Kabulu Kadingi ◽  
Marie-Françoise Vincent ◽  
Peter Van den Bergh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Acidosis ◽  
Muscular Dystrophy ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Congenital Muscular Dystrophy ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Serum Glucose ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Compensatory Mechanism ◽  
Emergency Caesarean

A 31-year-old pregnant woman ( weeks) was admitted with extreme tachypnea. She had a previous history of congenital muscular dystrophy (Ullrich’s disease) and isolated glucosuria. The patient had reduced food intake during the last 24 hours prior to admission and vomited twice. Serum glucose level was normal (112 mg/dL), while urinalysis revealed glucosuria 4+ and ketonuria 4+. ABG revealed pH 7.06, PCO29 mm Hg, and bicarbonate 2 mmol/L. Anion gap was 28 mmol/L. Tachypnea was a compensatory mechanism for a severe nonlactic metabolic acidosis. The diagnosis of starvation ketoacidosis was established. The patient received supplemental dextrose 10% intravenously and sodium bicarbonate. As fetal heart monitoring was pathological, an emergency caesarean section was performed. Umbilical cord venous pH was 7.01, with PCO234 mm Hg and bicarbonate 8 mmol/L. Starvation ketoacidosis is a rare metabolic disorder that may occur mainly in the third trimester of pregnancy. Muscular dystrophy and renal glucosuria were precipitating factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document