scholarly journals Binocular vision and abnormal head posture in children when watching television

1993 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan H. Friedman ◽  
Blaine S. Nashold ◽  
Robbin Sharp ◽  
Franco Caputi ◽  
Jose Arruda

✓ To determine the effects of ventral cervical and selective spinal accessory nerve rhizotomy on spasmodic torticollis, 58 patients who had undergone surgery between 1979 and 1987 were reviewed retrospectively. At the time of surgery, each nerve rootlet was electrically stimulated to determine its effect on the nuchal musculature prior to sectioning. Forty-nine patients (85%) had a marked improvement in their condition, with 33 (57%) attaining an excellent result and 16 (28%) noting significant improvement. Patients complained of abnormal head posture, nuchal muscle spasms, and pain prior to surgery. Muscle spasms were completely relieved in 42 patients (72%) and markedly reduced in 10 (17%). Of the 47 patients with preoperative pain, 30 (64%) were free of their pain and eight (17%) noted that the pain was reduced in intensity and frequency. Thirty-four patients (59%) reported that their resting head posture was restored to a neutral position. The likelihood that a patient's head posture returned to normal was inversely proportional to the preoperative duration of the spasmodic torticollis. Twenty-six patients (45%) suffered mild transient difficulty with swallowing solid foods in the immediate postoperative period. In most cases these minor difficulties abated in the months following surgery.


2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastassios Kostakis ◽  
Nonavinakere P. Manjunatha ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Elaine S. Moreland

Ophthalmology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (9) ◽  
pp. 1859-1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina V. Dumitrescu ◽  
Daniela C. Moga ◽  
Susannah Q. Longmuir ◽  
Richard J. Olson ◽  
Arlene V. Drack

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 379
Author(s):  
Masoud Khorrami-Nejad ◽  
MohamadReza Akbari ◽  
Haleh Kangari ◽  
Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban ◽  
Mehdi Ranjbar Pazouki

Author(s):  
Eric J. Tobaben ◽  
Larry D. Martin ◽  
Kenneth J. Fischer

Understanding natural head posture in animals is improtant in interpreting their biomechanics and behavior. For extinct animals, natural posture cannot be directly determined from the fossil record. There have been few prior studies of animal line of sight and head posture. Most line of sight studies have focused on the breadth of binocular vision versus panoramic vision in relation to behavior (predator type or grazer, for instance) or the animals typical environment (open or cluttered) [1]. For head posture some have studied changes in cognition or the environment or related aspects like the eyeball orientation as head posture changes [2]. Still others have focused on the areas of the brain that control 3D head position [3]. However, none of these studies address a method to determine the natural head posture or angle. While there currently is no definitive way to determine natural head angle in extinct animals, it seems reasonable to assume that the natural head posture would place the line of sight in the horizontal plane for most species. Therefore, we hypothesized that the opening for the optical (the optical foremen) and the eye socket structure itself can be used to accurately determine the natural head posture for a large portion of extant and extinct animal species. Specifically, if the skull is oriented such that the plane of sight (the plane common to both lines of sight) is horizontal, then the skull will be in the natural posture. If this hypothesis is shown to be valid, it will provide naturalists a reliable tool to determine the natural head posture (head angle) of extinct animals. The objective of this study was to test the above hypothesis on animals in the Felidae (cats).


2010 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-102
Author(s):  
Eric L. Singman ◽  
Noelle S. Matta ◽  
David I. Silbert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document