Is euthanasia a “good death”? The message of letter Samaritanus bonus in the experience of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross

This chapter explores the funerary rites in the Phoenician-Punic world from a comprehensive point of view, and it focuses on the common points arising from a large amount of data. The concern for burying their deceased and the belief in the soul’s afterlife show that the Phoenicians considered death as a transformation rather than as the end of a person’s life. Through our access to archaeological remains and written sources, we can reconstruct the existence of a meaningful burial program that was destined to provide a “good death” and afterlife. Funerary rituals, thus, are the actions or gestures to achieve this goal. The aim of this chapter is to explain the rites that family members undertook once someone died, in order to transform correctly the deceased person into an otherworldly being, the ancestor. The social implications of the data arising from burials are also briefly considered.

Download Full-text

Making Death a Penalty: Or, Making “Good” Death a “Good” Penalty

Death and Other Penalties ◽

10.1515/9780823265329-009 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 95-105

Keyword(s):

Good Death

Download Full-text

To hydrate or not to hydrate? The effect of hydration on survival, symptoms and quality of dying among terminally ill cancer patients

BMC Palliative Care ◽

10.1186/s12904-021-00710-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Chien-Yi Wu ◽

Ping-Jen Chen ◽

Tzu-Lin Ho ◽

Wen-Yuan Lin ◽

Shao-Yi Cheng

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Clinical Symptoms ◽

Terminally Ill ◽

Good Death ◽

Artificial Nutrition ◽

Symptom Improvement ◽

Terminally Ill Cancer Patients ◽

Quality Of Dying

Abstract Background Artificial nutrition and hydration do not prolong survival or improve clinical symptoms of terminally ill cancer patients. Nonetheless, little is known about the effect of artificial hydration (AH) alone on patients’ survival, symptoms or quality of dying. This study explored the relationship between AH and survival, symptoms and quality of dying among terminally ill cancer patients. Methods A pilot prospective, observational study was conducted in the palliative care units of three tertiary hospitals in Taiwan between October 2016 and December 2017. A total of 100 patients were included and classified into the hydration and non-hydration group using 400 mL of fluid per day as the cut-off point. The quality of dying was measured by the Good Death Scale (GDS). Multivariate analyses using Cox’s proportional hazards model were used to assess the survival status of patients, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for within-group analyses and the Mann-Whitney U test for between-groups analyses to evaluate changes in symptoms between day 0 and 7 in both groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictors of a good death. Results There were no differences in survival (p = 0.337) or symptom improvement between the hydration and non-hydration group, however, patients with AH had higher GDS scores. Conclusions AH did not prolong survival nor significantly improve dehydration symptoms of terminally ill cancer patients but it may influence the quality of dying. Communication with patients and their families on the effect of AH may help them better prepared for the end-of-life experience.

Download Full-text