scholarly journals Closure Methods for Midline Laparotomy Incisions Following Abdominal Surgery - A Comparative Study from Central India

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (24) ◽  
pp. 2089-2093
Author(s):  
Hari Om Singh Sengar ◽  
Kailash Charokar ◽  
Prashant Nema
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Mass Closure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Closure Method ◽  
Closure Group ◽  
Laparotomy Incision

BACKGROUND The method adopted for incision closure has an influence on the outcomes of wound healing. The study was conducted to compare the ‘mass closure’ method with the conventional layer closure, and to find out the suitable surgical closure method for midline laparotomy incision. METHODS A prospective comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching institute over a period of 2 years. Patients > 14 years of age, who were operated on by midline laparotomy incision, were included in the study group (N = 60). Either a ‘mass closure’ or the conventional layer closure method was adopted as per the operating surgeon’s choice. Based on the method used the cases were allocated into two groups, each with 30 patients. In the ‘mass closure’ group (Group A), continuous suturing was used in 22 patients and interrupted closure in 8 patients. In the ‘layered closure’ group (Group B), the abdomen was closed in layers using absorbable suture for the peritoneum (together with transversalis fascia) and non-absorbable for the linea alba. The patients were followed up postoperatively, and for 6 months after discharge from the hospital in follow-up for the detection of the wound complications. RESULTS The mean age of patients in Group A was 40.9 ± 15.48 years, and 41.03 ± 14.73 in Group B. There were 25 males and 5 females in Group A and 23 males and 7 females in Group B. Closure time of incision was significantly lower in the mass closure group (P < 0.05). The postoperative complications in Group A was 20 % (Seroma-1 patient, infection-3, partial wound dehiscence-1, and hernia-1). In Group B, the overall complication rate was 36 % (Seroma-3 patients, infection-5, burst abdomen- 1, hernia- 2). CONCLUSIONS Mass closure method is better than the conventional layer closure for the midline laparotomy incision. KEYWORDS Laparotomy, Layered Closure, Midline Incision, Mass Closure, Suture Technique

scholarly journals WOUND DEHISCENCE;

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (08) ◽  
pp. 1143-1146
Author(s):  
Ammrah Tahir ◽  
Muhammad Sajid Hameed Ansari ◽  
Abdul Waheed Khan
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Mass Closure ◽  
Generalized Peritonitis ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Group A ◽  
Continuous Mass ◽  
Group B ◽  
Laparotomy Incision

Objectives: To compare the continuous and interrupted closure in term offrequency of wound dehiscence in emergency midline laparotomy incision. Study Design:Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Surgical Unit-I, Allied Hospital Faisalabad. Period: From15th March 2014 to 15th November 2014. Material and Methods: Two hundred patients werediagnosed clinically by taking thorough history and examinations were included. Fascial layerof wound of the patients sampled for group A was closed with interrupted mass closure withprolene no.1 whereas in group B was closed by continuous mass closure with prolene no1. All included patients were kept nothing by mouth. Resuscitation was done with, ringerslactate and blood transfusion if needed until adequate urine output (0.5 ml/kg/hr). Base lineinvestigations were done. After resuscitation and giving preoperative antibiotics, patients wereexplored through mid-line incision. Obvious source of contamination was dealt with accordingly.Variables wound were examined daily for any sign of dehiscence. Temperature pulse wasmeasured daily along with surgical site examination for any kind of discharge, stitches cutthrough and gut visibility through wound. In case of no complication patient was discharged ontenth postoperative day, which was the end point of study. Results: There were 61 (61%) malesand 39 (39%) females in group A, while in group B, 63 (63%) males and 37 (37%) females withmean ages of patients were 39.77+10.16 and 38.61+9.75 respectively. The wound dehiscencewere found 7 (7%) in Group-A and 18(18%) in Group-B while remaining 93 (93%) in Group-Aand 82 (82%) in Group-B had no morbidity statistically (p<0.01). Conclusion: It is concludedthat wound dehiscence is significantly higher in continuous closure as compare to interruptedclosure for emergency midline laparotomy incision for generalized peritonitis.

Layered versus Mass Closure of Vertical Midline Laparotomy Wounds in Negro Africans

1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spencer E E Efem ◽  
Akuma Aja
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Burst Abdomen ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Mass Closure ◽  
Ancestry Group ◽  
Keloid Formation ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group B

A prospective comparative study of layered closure versus mass closure of vertical midline laparotomy incisions was undertaken in 314 consecutive patients of indigenous Negroid ancestry. Group A (109 patients) had mass closure and group B (205 patients) had layered closure. The patients were similar in both groups. Group A consisted of 49 (45%) emergencies and 60 (55%) elective cases, and group B of 93 (45%) emergencies and 112 (55%) elective cases. There were 6 cases of burst abdomen and 4 cases of incisional hernia in group B; group A suffered no wound failure. The wound infection rates were 3.7% for group A and 10% for group B. Mass closure carries lower wound failure rates than layered closure of laparotomy wounds, and polyamide sutures do not increase keloid formation in Negro patients.

scholarly journals Mass closure versus layered closure of midline laparotomy incisions: a prospective comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santoshkumar N. Deshmukh ◽  
Audumbar N. Maske
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Mass Closure ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Laparotomy Wound ◽  
Closure Group

Background: The ideal method of abdominal wound closure remains to be discovered. It should be technically so simple that the results are as good in the hands of a trainee as in those of the master surgeon. The best abdominal closure technique should be fast, easy, and cost effective while preventing both early and late complications. Present study is undertaken to compare the two methods (Mass closure and Layered closure) of laparotomy wound closure in relation to post-operative complications, time for wound closure and cost effectiveness in both groups and also to decide the most effective method among the two.Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted in department of surgery at a tertiary care teaching hospital at Solapur (Maharashtra) from January 2006 to January 2009. On admission, patients suspected of having intraabdominal pathology, a thorough clinical e and general assessment was done. Necessary radiological and biochemical investigations were done to support the diagnosis. After confirmation of diagnosis patients were subjected for exploratory laparotomy. The laparotomy wound was closed with either by Mass closure or Layered closure technique. Patients were followed up for 6 months in post-operative period for detection late complications.Results: Total 60 patients of were studied. Majority of patients were in 61 to 65 age group. Male outnumbered the females. Incidence of early complications like seroma, wound infection is more in layered closure group as compared to mass closure. Mean wound closure time is more in layered closure group. Mass closure technique is more cost effective than layered closure group.Conclusions: Mass closure technique is less time consuming, more cost effective and safe for closure of midline laparotomy incisions.

scholarly journals Cecorraphy in single layer using polypropylene and poliglecaprone 25 threads: comparative study in rats

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Issamu Tabushi ◽  
Luiz Masakatso Nomura ◽  
Osvaldo Malafaia ◽  
Jurandir Marcondes Ribas-Filho ◽  
Benur Polonio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Optical Microscopy ◽  
Average Rate ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Clinical Evolution ◽  
Microscopic Evaluation ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Poliglecaprone 25

PURPOSE: To compare sutures with polypropylene and poliglecaprone 25 after partial cecotomy in rats. METHODS: Thirty six rats divided into two groups, A and B, of 18 animals; each group was also divided into three subgroups of six animals sacrificed at 4th, 7th and 14th days after surgery. Were studied the mortality, morbidity, complications attributable to sutures, macroscopy, optical microscopy and measurement of hydroxyproline at the level of the suture. RESULTS: There were no deaths or wound complications such as hematoma, seroma, abscess, evisceration or eventration. On microscopic evaluation reepithelization, coaptation and inflammation in both groups did not differ significantly. The average rate of tissue hydroxyproline found in the samples on the 4th day after surgery, was 21.38 mg/g tissue for group A and 16.68 mg/g for group B; on day 7 after surgery, the average was 15.64 mg/g tissue for group A and 26.53 mg/g for group B; on day 14, the average was 8.09 mg/g tissue for group A and 25.07 mg/g for group B. CONCLUSION: There were no differences on clinical evolution, macroscopic aspect, microscopic data and hydroxyproline concentration on both sutures.

scholarly journals A Prospective Study Comparing Continuous Versus Interrupted Suture Techniques in Midline Abdominal Wound Closure

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-66
Author(s):  
Shiv Vansh Bharti ◽  
Anup Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Burst Abdomen ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Laparotomy Wound ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Wound closure after midline laparotomy is an essential part of surgery to produce a healthy and a strong scar. There is an alternative interrupted method of closure as compared to conventional continuous method of closure. Many comparative studies have shown different outcomes. So, we wanted to evaluate the outcome of different techniques in our setting. Aims: To compare the outcome of Interrupted abdominal closure and continuous abdominal closure in midline laparotomy wound. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study conducted in the Department of Surgery of Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur, Banke, Nepal for a duration of 1 year. A total of 60 patients were selected randomly to receive either continuous or interrupted abdominal closure in midline laparotomy wound. Wound was evaluated in terms of wound discharge, infection and wound dehiscence. Results: The mean age of the patients was 38.38 years. Most commonly, the patients presented with duodenal ulcer perforation with peritonitis. The average time taken for abdomen closure in group A (16.77 minutes) was significantly less as compared to group B (27.77 minutes). The average cost of sutures for group B (Rs 1322.97) was higher than that of sutures for group A (Rs 1118) with p value of <0.01. Wound infection and incidence of burst abdomen were similar in both groups after one month, suture sinus was seen in three patients of group A and four patients of group B (p = 1.0). Incisional hernia was seen in one patient of group A and in none of the patients of group B at three month’s follow-up (p = 1.0). Conclusion: Continuous technique of midline laparotomy wound closure is better in terms of time required for wound closure and costing of suture materials, while showing no difference in terms of wound infection, burst abdomen and late wound complications

scholarly journals Wound dehiscence with continuous versus interrupted mass closure of transverse incisions in children with absorbable suture: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e000016
Author(s):  
Safwan Khan ◽  
Muhammad Saleem ◽  
Nabila Talat
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Mass Closure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
Continuous Mass ◽  
Group B

IntroductionNumerous meta-analyses done on adults suggest superiority of continuous mass closure technique, but any such study does not exist for the pediatric age group. The results in adults cannot be applied to pediatrics because of numerous physiologic and anatomic differences.MethodsThis is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 1:1 parallel groups, that compares the frequency of dehiscence between the interrupted and continuous mass closure techniques for transverse incisions in pediatric patients. The age range was from birth to 12 years. We sampled 350 patients undergoing emergency or elective exploratory laparotomies in our pediatric surgery unit. Blocked randomization was used and only the patients remained blinded during the intervention. One group was closed with interrupted mass closure (group A) and the other group with continuous mass closure technique (group B). We had to drop 50 patients for not meeting the inclusion criteria.ResultsThe wound dehiscence rate for group A was 1.34% (4 patients) and for group B was 3.0% (9 patients). Significance was calculated using χ2 (p<0.156). The global wound dehiscence rate was 4.34% (13 patients). The maximum number of patients dehisced on the fifth postoperative day, while the range was 4–11 days. The only statistically significant confounding factor was wound classification (p<0.002).DiscussionStatistically there is no significant difference between interrupted and continuous mass closures techniques in terms of wound dehiscence. The dirty wounds are at a maximum risk of developing wound dehiscence irrespective of the technique used. We need to strictly adhere to the basic principles of closure especially when dealing with dirty wounds.Trial registration numberTCTR20150318001.

Absorbable suture material in carotid surgery

VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Gasbarro ◽  
Luca Traina ◽  
Francesco Mascoli ◽  
Vincenzo Coscia ◽  
Gianluca Buffone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Suture Material ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Paediatric Surgery ◽  
Carotid Surgery ◽  
Suture Materials ◽  
Absorbable Suture Material ◽  
Absorbable Sutures ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract. Background: Absorbable sutures are not generally accepted by most vascular surgeons for the fear of breakage of the suture line and the risk of aneurysmal formation, except in cases of paediatric surgery or in case of infections. Aim of this study is to provide evidence of safety and efficacy of the use of absorbable suture materials in carotid surgery. Patients and methods: In an 11 year period, 1126 patients (659 male [58.5 %], 467 female [41.5 %], median age 72) underwent carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis by either conventional with primary closure (cCEA) or eversion (eCEA) techniques. Patients were randomised into two groups according to the type of suture material used. In Group A, absorbable suture material (polyglycolic acid) was used and in Group B non-absorbable suture material (polypropylene) was used. Primary end-point was to compare severe restenosis and aneurysmal formation rates between the two groups of patients. For statistical analysis only cases with a minimum period of follow-up of 12 months were considered. Results: A total of 868 surgical procedures were considered for data analysis. Median follow-up was 6 years (range 1-10 years). The rate of postoperative complications was better for group A for both cCEA and eCEA procedures: 3.5 % and 2.0 % for group A, respectively, and 11.8 % and 12.9 % for group B, respectively. Conclusions: In carotid surgery, the use of absorbable suture material seems to be safe and effective and with a general lower complications rate compared to the use of non-absorbable materials.

COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BETWEEN INTRALESIONAL VITAMIN D3 AND INTRALESIONAL BLEOMYCIN IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS VERRUCAE

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrikant . ◽  
R.D. Mehta ◽  
B.C. Ghiya
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Vitamin D3 ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Additional Advantage ◽  
Cost Effective Treatment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Verruca is one of the common dermatopathologies which has multiple therapeutic options but with variable success rates, refractory cases and high recurrence rates. Nowadays, treatment with intralesional injections has gained recognition due to its effectiveness in clearing verrucae. These act by stimulating the cell-mediated immunity. Out of scores of options available for intralesional therapeutics, Vitamin D3 appears to be more promising but least evaluated. Therefore, we planned to evaluate the efficacy of intralesional Vitamin D3 in various types of cutaneous verrucae. Simultaneously the results were compared with intralesional bleomycin, also. Methods: A total of 200 patients of cutaneous verrucae with varying size and duration were included in the experimental randomized comparative study. We divided them into two groups. Group A, comprising of 100 patients, received 0.2-0.5 ml intralesional Vitamin D3 (600,000 IU, 15mg/ml) and Group B, also of hundred subjects, received intralesional Bleomycin (1 mg/ml) into the base of verrucae. A maximum of 5 verrucae were injected per session at 3 weeks interval until resolution or for a maximum of 4 sessions. Patients were followed up for 6 months after the last injection to assess the clearance status and detect any recurrence. Results: In Group A (Vitamin D3), 'Complete response', 'Partial response' and 'No response' were observed in 85.07%, 6.74% and 8.17% respectively after 4 sessions. Recurrence rate was 0.81% after 6 months. In Group B (Bleomycin), 'Complete response', 'Partial response' and 'No response' were found in 77.99%, 10.47% and 11.53% in the series. Recurrence rate was 1.71%, comparatively higher in group B. Conclusion: The efficacy of intralesional Vitamin D3 was found significantly higher as compared to intralesional Bleomycin in the treatment of cutaneous verrucae with less recurrence rates. Vitamin D3 has an additional advantage of cost-effective treatment over Bleomycin. We purpose its use, as a primary mode of treatment in various types of cutaneous verrucae. Keywords: Bleomycin, Vitamin D3, Verrucae.

Comparative Study Between Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization (Cisc) and Continuous Indwelling Catheterization (Cidc) in Relieving Acute Refractory Retention of Urine Due to Benign Enlargement of Prostate (Bep)

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-110
Author(s):  
Md Shawkat Alam ◽  
Sudip Das Gupta ◽  
Hadi Zia Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Md Saruar Alam ◽  
Sharif Muhammod Wasimuddin
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Bladder Capacity ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Better Than

Objective: To compare the clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) with continuous indwelling catheterization (CIDC) in relieving acute urinary retention (AUR) due to benign enlargement of prostate (BEP). Materials and Methods :A total 60 patients attending in urology department of Dhaka Medical college hospital were included according to inclusion criteria ,Patients were randomized by lottery into two groups namely group –A and group –B for CISC and IDC drainage respectively . Thus total 60 patients 30 in each group completed study. Results : Most men can safely be managed as out-patients after AUR due to BPH. The degree of mucosal congestion and inflammation within the bladder was found to be lower in those using CISC and the bladder capacity in these patients was also found higher.Patients with an IDC had a high incidence of UTIs then that of patients with CISC. During the period of catheterization the incidence of UTI was 43.3% in group B in comparison to 40% in group A; before TURP 36% in group B in comparison to 10% incidence in group A.According to patient’s opinion CISC is better than IDC in the management of AUR. Experiencing bladder spasm, reporting blood in urine, management difficulties, incidence and severity of pain were less in CISC group, and the method of CISC was well accepted by patients as well as their family members. Conclusion: From the current study it may be suggested that CISC is better technique for management of AUR patient due to BPH than IDC. It can also be very helpful when surgery must be delayed or avoided due to any reasons in this group of patients. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 21, No. 2, July 2018 p.105-110

scholarly journals A comparative study between the effect of verapamil versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant in supraclavicular brachial plexus block

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ibrahim Khamis ◽  
Ahmed Saeed Mohamed ◽  
Hesham Mohamed El Azazy ◽  
Hala Salah El Ozairy ◽  
Mohamed Moien Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Abstract Background Brachial plexus block has substituted general anesthesia in the majority of patients planned for upper limb surgeries as it avoids the undesired effects of the medications used in general anesthesia as well as the stress response associated with airway manipulation. Opioid agonist–antagonists such as nalbuphine are used as adjuvant to improve the anesthetic properties of bupivacaine. Verapamil has an additive effect in brachial plexus blockade in the form of decreasing the consumption of analgesics in the postoperative period with reducing onset time and extending the duration of motor and sensory blockade. The aim of this study is to investigate the adjuvant effect of verapamil versus nalbuphine to 0.5% bupivacaine in brachial plexus block as regards onset, duration of sensory and motor blockade and postoperative analgesic augmentation. The study is randomized, prospective, double-blinded, comparative study where 90 patients subjected to arm, forearm and hand surgeries were randomized into three groups, group A received 30 ml of plain bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml of normal saline, group B received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml verapamil equivalent to 5 mg, group C received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 10 mg of nalbuphine diluted in 2 ml of normal saline. Results Results of this study showed that group C and group B sensory block time onset was 7.25 ± 1.5 vs. 10.92 ± 3.84 min, P < 0.001 and was shorter than that in group A (13.2 ± 2.66 min). In addition, the motor block onset was (11.10 ± 1.24 vs. 13.50 ± 3.77 min, P < 0.001) shorter than group A (17.16 ± 1.30 min). In group C and group B, sensory block duration was 396 ± 32.17 vs. 355.83 ± 18.48 min, P < 0.001, respectively and was longer than that in group A (321.13 ± 25.08 min). Also, there was prolonged motor block duration in group C and group B recording (338.92 ± 25.2 vs. 302.93 ± 15.24 min, P < 0.001) and was longer than that in group A (280.70 ± 32.35 min). Time of demand of rescue analgesia dose was significantly long in group C and group B (449.53 ± 52.45 vs. 418.13 ± 41.12 min, P < 0.001) and was longer than group A (361.31 ± 21.42 min). Both verapamil and nalbuphine have additive effect to bupivacaine improving the all anesthetic parameters of the block. Conclusion Both drugs produce favorable enhancement of time onset and effective prolongation of duration of sensory and motor blockade and extend the period of postoperative analgesia with superiority to nalbuphine over verapamil.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document