scholarly journals Safety of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapies in Arthritis Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radu M Nanau ◽  
Manuela G Neuman

Purpose. Inflammatory and rheumatic arthritis remain leading causes of disability worldwide. The arthritis therapeutic area commands the largest market for the prescription of biological and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Yet biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies conducting research and providing therapeutics in this area frequently face challenges in patient safety.  The purpose of our study was to assess safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies in arthritis patients.  Methods: The present study systematically reviews adverse events of biologicals alone or in the presence of NSAIDs and other immunosuppressant therapeutics such as disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). We assessed the rheumatology literature that included clinical trials with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologicals and case reports published between 2010 and 2014.  Results: Currently approved anti-TNF biologicals in arthritis include the monoclonal antibodies infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol and golimumab, and the fusion protein etanercept. The most frequently-reported adverse event was infection. We grouped the adverse reactions as immune-mediated, hypersensitivity syndrome reactions including cutaneous and hepatic manifestation, neurological, hematological, and malignancy.  Discussion: Most adverse events are due to the failure of host immunological control, which involves susceptibility to the drug itself, or de novo infection or reactivation of a latent bacterial or viral infection, often with a different expression of disease. Drug-induced liver injury associated with anti-TNF biologicals must be kept in mind when evaluating patients with increased liver enzymes.  Conclusion: Risk assessment in individuals undergoing treatment with biologicals represents a step towards achieving a personalized medicine approach to identify those patients that will safely benefit from this therapeutic approach. Patients and physicians must be alert of anti-TNF agents as potential causes of drug-induced liver injury and monitor the therapies. Personalizing therapeutic pharmacovigilance promises to optimize benefits while minimizing side effects.This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-910
Author(s):  
Baldvin I. Gunnarsson ◽  
Gerdur Grondal ◽  
Bjorn R. Ludviksson ◽  
Rannveig Einarsdottir ◽  
Sigurdur Olafsson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 602-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Einar S. Björnsson ◽  
Baldvin I. Gunnarsson ◽  
Gerdur Gröndal ◽  
Jon G. Jonasson ◽  
Rannveig Einarsdottir ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Ishida ◽  
Toshikazu Kondo ◽  
Koichi Tsuneyama ◽  
Peirong Lu ◽  
Tatsunori Takayasu ◽  
...  

Oral Diseases ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Vučićević Bora ◽  
V Brailo ◽  
J Lukač ◽  
D Kordić ◽  
P Picek ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 2331-2338
Author(s):  
Vera E. R. Asscher ◽  
◽  
Quirine van der Vliet ◽  
Karen van der Aalst ◽  
Anniek van der Aalst ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To assess safety and effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in IBD patients ≥ 60 years. Methods Ninety IBD patients ≥ 60 years at initiation of anti-TNF therapy, 145 IBD patients ≥ 60 years without anti-TNF therapy and 257 IBD patients < 60 years at initiation of anti-TNF therapy were retrospectively included in this multicentre study. Primary outcome was the occurrence of severe adverse events (SAEs), serious infections and malignancies. Secondary outcome was effectiveness of therapy. Cox regression analyses were used to assess differences in safety and effectiveness. In safety analyses, first older patients with and without anti-TNF therapy and then older and younger patients with anti-TNF therapy were assessed. Results In older IBD patients, the use of anti-TNF therapy was associated with serious infections (aHR 3.920, 95% CI 1.185–12.973, p = .025). In anti-TNF-exposed patients, cardiovascular disease associated with serious infections (aHR 3.279, 95% CI 1.098–9.790, p = .033) and the presence of multiple comorbidities (aHR 9.138 (1.248–66.935), p = .029) with malignancies, while patient age did not associate with safety outcomes. Effectiveness of therapy was not affected by age or comorbidity. Conclusion Older patients receiving anti-TNF therapy have a higher risk of serious infections compared with older IBD patients without anti-TNF therapy, but not compared with younger patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. However, in anti-TNF-exposed patients, comorbidity was found to be an indicator with regards to SAEs. Effectiveness was comparable between older and younger patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document