scholarly journals Repair Bond Strength of Composite to Zirconia Ceramic Using Two Types of Zirconia Primers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoseinali Mahgoli ◽  
Mahnaz Arshad ◽  
Kamran Rasouli ◽  
Ali Akbar Sobati ◽  
Ahmad Reza Shamshiri
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Adhesive Failure ◽  
Cohesive Failure ◽  
Simultaneous Application ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
The Mean

  Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effect of application of two types of zirconia primers on repair bond strength of composite to zirconia ceramic. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, 60 zirconia blocks were divided into five groups and subjected to the application of Z-Prime Plus (ZPP), Monobond Plus (MBP), Porcelain Bonding Resin (PBR), ZPP followed by PBR (ZPP+PBR) and MBP followed by PBR (MBP+PBR). They were then bonded to Z100 composite. The samples were then immersed in water at 37°C for 24 hours, thermocycled for 1000 cycles between 5-55°C and subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test. The mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: The mean bond strength was the highest in ZPP+PBR group followed by MBP+PBR, ZPP, PBR and MBP group (22.29±8.86, 15.75±2.81, 12.02±3.24, 3.60±2.92 and 2.92±1.78 MPa, respectively). The effects of type of zirconia primer and use/no use of PBR on SBS were significant (P<0.05). The frequency of adhesive failure in MBP and PBR groups was significantly higher than that in MBP+PBR and ZPP+PBR groups (P<0.05). The cohesive failure was significantly more frequent in ZPP+PBR group than in ZPP, MBP and PBR groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Simultaneous application of zirconia primer and PBR is the most efficient technique for repair of all-ceramic zirconia restorations with composite resin.

The Effect of Ceramic Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite Resin to All-Ceramic Coping Materials

2007 ◽  
Vol 330-332 ◽  
pp. 1365-1368
Author(s):  
W.H. Kim ◽  
H.J. Lee ◽  
Keun Woo Lee ◽  
Kwang Mahn Kim ◽  
Kyoung Nam Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Dental Composite ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Alumina Particles

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin to 4 different all-ceramic coping materials with 3 different surface treatments after thermocycling and without thermocycling. Three different surface treatments - sandblasting with 50 ㎛ alumina particles (AB); sandblasting with 50 ㎛ alumina particles and acid etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid (AE); sandblasting with 50 ㎛ alumina particles and 30 ㎛ alumina particles with tribochemical silica coating (SI) and silane application - were used on four different all-ceramic; Feldspatic ceramic (Duceram Plus); Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS Empress2); Alumica ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina); Zirconia ceramic (Zi-Ceram) - substrates. Shear bond strength of restorative composite resin to substrate was tested after thermocycling and without thermocycling (n=10). Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 2 ㎜/min until fracture. Two-way analysis of variance and Duncan multiple comparison test (α =0.05) were used to analyze the bond strength values. There were significant differences in the bond strengths for ceramic types (P<.001), surface treatments (P<.001), and thermocycling (P<.001). The Duncan analysis showed that the Si specimens had significantly higher bonding strengths than other specimens. The bond strength of composite resin decreased after thermocycling.

Adhesion of Polycarboxylate-based Dental Cements to Enamel: An in vivo Study

1986 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 885-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Jemt ◽  
P.A. Stålblad ◽  
G. Øilo
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Tensile Force ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Adhesive Failure ◽  
Cohesive Failure ◽  
The Mean

The bond strength of two polycarboxylate and two glass ionomer cements to enamel in vivo has been measured by a tensile test method. The four cements were used to cement small stainless steel cylinders onto the facial surfaces of 11 and 21. The cylinders were removed by a tensile force applied by a handpiece containing a semi-conductor sensory unit. The results showed that all cements gave two sets of bond strength values, either a good bond corresponding to a cohesive failure, or a weak bond corresponding to an adhesive failure. The mean bond strength values were lower than those recorded in vitro, and differences among the cements were limited.

scholarly journals Bond to Zirconia Ceramic: Evaluation of Different Primers and a Universal Adhesive

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 929-936
Author(s):  
Diego Fabris Ferreira da Silva ◽  
Raquel de Oliveira Lopes ◽  
Niélli Caetano de Souza ◽  
Maurem Leitão Marcondes ◽  
Patrícia Danesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Cohesive Failure ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Type Of Failure

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of a universal adhesive and different primers on the bond strength to zirconia ceramic. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five zirconia ceramic samples were obtained and divided into five groups (n=15): G1–Scothbond Universal (SBU); G2 – silane + SBU; G3 - Signum Zirconia Bond; G4 - Z-Prime Plus; G5 - MZ Primer. A cone of composite resin was built. The specimens were stored in 100% relative humidity with distilled water at 37°C for 48 h and then submitted to a tensile bond strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The type of failure that occurred during the de-bonding procedure was analyzed. Results: The mean results of the bond strength test (MPa) followed by the same letter represent no statistical difference by ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (p<0.05): G2=27.55a (±6.99), G4=23.71a (±5.65), G1=22.64a (±5.67), G5=13.64b (±5.49), G3=7.54c (±4.75). G2 and G4 exhibited predominantly cohesive failure in the composite resin cone. G1 and G5 had predominantly mixed failures, and G3 exhibited only adhesive failures. Conclusion: The SBU and Z-Prime Plus provided higher bond strength to zirconia ceramic.

scholarly journals An Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Enamel under Various Saliva Contaminated Conditions: An in vitro Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 101-104
Author(s):  
Smita Khalikar ◽  
Anita Kale ◽  
Abhay Kamra ◽  
Yogesh Kale
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Normal Ideal ◽  
Ideal Condition ◽  
Intimate Contact ◽  
The Mean

ABSTRACT To produce good adhesion between composite resin and etched enamel surface, it is necessary to form a microscopi- cally intimate contact between them. Contaminants, like saliva, may interfere with such bonding. Salivary contamination may reduce the bond strength between composite resin and the enamel by 40 to 60%. Recent studies have suggested that only rewashing and drying of the etched and saliva contaminated enamel surface is sufficient in restoring bond strength to the normal ideal condition. Purpose To evaluate the effect of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of composite resin to enamel by using different parameters. Materials and methods The highest mean shear bond strength of composite resin was obtained on the uncontami- nated enamel surface, and the lowest mean shear bond strength was obtained on the saliva contaminated moist enamel surface. Results The mean shear bond strength of composite resin to saliva contaminated, washed and air-dried enamel surface was less than the mean shear bond strength to the dry enamel surface. Conclusion This suggests that only rewashing of the saliva contaminated enamel surface is not enough in achieving bond strength equal to that of the uncontaminated enamel surface. How to cite this article Kale A, Kamra A, Kale Y, Khalikar S. An Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Enamel under Various Saliva Contaminated Conditions: An in vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2014;4(4):101-104.

scholarly journals Shear bond strength evaluation of bonded molar tubes on fluorotic molars

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika L. Silva-Benítez ◽  
Veronica Zavala-Alonso ◽  
Gabriel A. Martinez-Castanon ◽  
Juan P. Loyola-Rodriguez ◽  
Nuria Patiño-Marin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Dental Fluorosis ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Electronic Microscope

Abstract Objective: To study the shear bond strength (SBS), sites of failure, and micromorphology of bonded molar tubes used on teeth affected by dental fluorosis. Materials and Methods: This in vitro study included 140 first molars classified according to Dean's index for dental fluorosis. Samples were divided into seven groups: (1) healthy teeth etched for 15 seconds, (2) teeth with moderate fluorosis (MOF) etched for 15 seconds, (3) teeth with MOF etched for 150 seconds, (4) teeth with MOF microabrasion etched for 15 seconds, (5) teeth with severe fluorosis (SEF) etched for 15 seconds, (6) teeth with SEF etched for 150 seconds, and (7) teeth with SEF microabrasion etched for 15 seconds. All samples were incubated and were then submitted to the SBS test and evaluated with the modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) and analyzed by using a scanning electronic microscope. Results: The SBS mean value for healthy enamel was 20 ± 10.2 MPa. For the group with MOF, the etched 150-second mean value was the highest (19 ± 7.6 MPa); for the group with SEF treated with microabrasion and etched for 15 seconds, the mean value was (13 ± 4.1 MPa). Significant differences (P ≤ .05) were found in the ARI between healthy and fluorosed groups. Conclusions: Fluorotic enamel affects the adhesion of bonded molar tubes. The use of overetching in cases of MOF and the combination of microabrasion and etching in SEF provides a suitable adhesion for fixed appliance therapy.

scholarly journals Effects of Universal Adhesive on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Zirconia Ceramic with Different Surface Treatments

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Zohreh Moradi ◽  
Farnoosh Akbari ◽  
Sara Valizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Universal Adhesive

Aim. This study aimed to assess shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement to zirconia ceramic with different surface treatments by using Single Bond Universal. Methods. In this in vitro study, 50 zirconia discs (2 × 6 mm) were divided into 5 groups of (I) sandblasting with silica-coated alumina (CoJet)  + silane + Single Bond 2, (II) sandblasting with CoJet + Single Bond Universal, (III) sandblasting with alumina + Single Bond Universal, (IV) sandblasting with alumina + Z-Prime Plus, and (V) Single Bond Universal with no surface treatment. Resin cement was applied in plastic tubes (3 × 5 mm2), and after 10,000 thermal cycles, the SBS was measured by a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope at × 40 magnification. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Results. The maximum (6.56 ± 4.29 MPa) and minimum (1.94 ± 1.96 MPa) SBS values were noted in groups III and I, respectively. Group III had the highest frequency of mixed failure (60%). Group V had the maximum frequency of adhesive failure (100%). Conclusion. Single Bond Universal + sandblasting with alumina or silica-coated alumina particles is an acceptable method to provide a strong SBS between resin cement and zirconia.

scholarly journals High bonding strength between zirconia and composite resin based on combined surface treatment for dental restorations

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 228080002092865
Author(s):  
Rui li ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Shi Qing Ma ◽  
Zi Hao Liu ◽  
Cheng Cheng Zang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Thermal Cycling ◽  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Dental Restoration ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Dental Restorations

Zirconia is the preferred material for dental restorations; however, dental restorations are usually affected by zirconia fractures due to chipping and delamination of the veneer ceramic. One effective solution for repairing chemically inert zirconia frameworks is to strongly chemically bond them with the composite resin via surface modification. Thus, the bonding strength between the zirconia and composite resin determines the performance of dental restoration. Herein, we investigate the shear bond strength between zirconia ceramic and two ceramic repair systems before and after thermal cycling based on different surface pretreatments, including air-abrasion and a novel silane coupling agent. When treated with combined sandblasting, novel silane and 10-methacryloyloxydecyl hydrogen phosphate act as a bonding agent for the zirconia surface, and the maximum shear bond strength achieves 27.5 MPa, as measured by a universal testing machine through the average of 16 separate measurements. The results show that the combined treatment resists the interface damage caused by expansion and contraction during thermal cycling. The long-term bond durability is due to the micro-mechanical bond force formed by resin and ceramic, and the chemical bonds of Zr-O-Si at the interface. Results indicate that selective pretreating the surface results in high bond strength between the zirconia and the composite resin, which is meaningful to optimize dental restoration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document