scholarly journals Creative Economy in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Mikhaylova

The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of a new creative economy. Creative economy is a special sector of the economy, combining activities related to intellectual work, creativity. The creative economy is based on intellectual work, generating income not only from the final product created, but also from trading in its results and intellectual property rights as opposed to traditional factors of production. In the creative economy, the kreatosphere is formed. The kreatosphere is a type of activity in the creative economy. Features of the products of the creative economy are the high added values created by intellectual effort. On the example of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), accelerators of the development of the kreatosphere are highlighted: the development of educational programs, the preparation of creative, creative-minded specialists; support of innovation centers and investments in creative industries; development of creative projects. Keywords: new economy, creative economy, digital economy, kreatosphere, creative class, creativity

Author(s):  
Phan The Cong

Creative industries have been seen to become increasingly important to economic well-being, with proponents suggesting that "human creativity is the ultimate economic resource," and that “the industries of the twenty-first century will depend increasingly on the generation of knowledge through creativity and innovation.” The term creative industries, refers to a range of economic activities which are concerned with the generation or exploitation of knowledge and information. Development of creative industries will contribute to the awareness and protection of intellectual property rights and copyrights in the creative industry, in order to meet the WTO’s requirements on intellectual property rights. Government support for creative industries will help create a healthy competitive environment for businesses in the industry. It is important for Vietnam’s businesses to select a proper orientation and gain a suitable position in the global creative economy. The creative service sectors of great strength in Vietnam, which are also in need of investment are: design, art, education, tourism, performing arts, fashion, handicraft, culture, foods, and others. Additionally, empirical investigations in the present study reveal that creative industry indicators have a positive and significant influence on the economy and financial sectors. This study’s findings are highly recommended to government officials, economists, and anyone else working to make strategic decisions to achieve better economic results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Danyal Khan ◽  
Rao Imran Habib ◽  
Attaullah Mehmood ◽  
Abdul Basit

This paper examines the relationship between enforcement of intellectual property rights and growth of the creative economy. Intellectual property based creative industries highly contribute towards national economy through trade, value addition, and tax revenues. Size of the global creative economy has almost doubled during 2015 leading it to the figure of $509 billion that was $205 billion during year 2002. It is worth noting that major player in global volume of creative economy are South Asian countries such as China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, India, and Taiwan. Major creative industries include software, pharmaceutical, music, cinema, fashion, design, art, culture, photography, publishing, and other related creative works. Creative industries need support of effective enforcement from intellectual property rights to pay incentive to a creator for its investment of expertise, labour, and finances. In absence of effective intellectual property enforcement and violation of intellectual property rights, innovation may go slow that affects growth of the creative economy. This research highlights potentials of growth of the creative economies in Pakistan in terms of intellectual property rights.


2019 ◽  
pp. 27-49
Author(s):  
Barbara Townley ◽  
Philip Roscoe ◽  
Nicola Searle

The creative economy is driven by the transfer of property; tradable property is the ‘product’ of the creative industries. The chapter explores how intellectual property (IP)/intellectual property rights (IPR) function to constitute creative work as a market object that can be disentangled and sold. The chapter deals first with the performative role of law in constructing market objects. We examine how law, with its focus on authorship and originality, embodies a particular conception of solitary artistic creation, inherited from nineteenth-century Romantic aesthetics; at the same time, the law also mandates property rights as a means of constituting a market object, and these property rights necessitate a creator to whom they can attach. Both aspects seem highly artificial in view of the collaborative and collective processes that produce creative work and it becomes clear that creative producers have to manage this multifaceted, liminal object in the shape of the IP/IPR nexus.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
putri indah sari

The problems in this research are: (1) Is the patent in production can be provided to the workers / employees as a inventor? (2) How will the moral rights attached to the inventor to patent the intellectual work produced during the production process? This research uses normative juridical approach. Source of data derived from secondary data that primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. The results showed that patents in the production process is not given to the discoverer of workers / employees. The government needs to dissemination of the patents and other intellectual property rights so that a producer of intellectual work so that they know that the law protects what they produce. Governments also need to revise the provisions of Article 12 paragraph (1) Patent Law, where the rights of patent holders fixed on the inventor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 770
Author(s):  
Karlygash Asilkhanovna JUMABAYEVA ◽  
Lola Furkatovna TATARINOVA ◽  
Gulnaz Tursunovna ALAYEVA ◽  
Saule Zhusupbekovna SULEIMENOVA ◽  
Danila Vladimirovich TATARINOV

This study is concerned with one of the most burning issues of intellectual property rights, namely the notarial protection of the testator's exclusive rights. The article analyzes the Kazakh and international experience in solving this issue. In the course of the study, the authors obtained the following results: - In legal practice, the non-acceptance of inheritance and refusal to inherit exclusive rights have their specific features; - It is proposed to supplement the existing civil legislation on the protection of the testator's copyrights. ‘Kazakhstan Authors' Society’ conducts its activities in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Its main function is to manage the property rights of authors. This management includes the issuance of permits to use deliverables on behalf of authors, as well as the collection, distribution and payment of royalties. It has been established that a notary has the right to apply to ‘Kazakhstan Authors' Society’ to determine one's authorship. The authors have revealed that the current Kazakh legislation does not state the creation time of some deliverable and does not provide for the notarial certification of a web page (in case of copyright infringement). Thus, a notary takes measures to protect the intellectual property rights owned by the copyright holder that might become the subject of succession.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
richa okta septiya

Actually the procedure for making and managing patents is not as complicated or expensive as imagined, indeed to be granted it takes a long time because of various considerations such as checking whether in other countries there have been similar patents or not, and various other technical reasons. Proposals for filing patents include the title of invention, background of invention, brief description of intellectual work found and technical drawings. Technical drawings accompanied by a brief description. Then equipped with abstracts and claims. This circuit is then called the preparation of patent specifications.Patent specifications as a minimum requirement that must be included. The three conditions must be met to obtain a filing date, among which are fulfilling patent specifications, application forms and registration fees. As for other requirements as a formality, where this condition can be completed for three months after receiving the date of receipt. If the terms of the above points are complete, the inventor is just waiting for the results from DJHKI. Announcement will be published publicly after 18 months from the results of the submission. Patent applicants while waiting for the announcement are published in the official news on patents and official media. The goal is to find out about patented intellectual property rights. If the community or outside inventors object because they are deemed not to be eligible for patenting, they can submit in writing to DJHKI.Especially for rejected inventors, it is permissible to appeal to the Patent Appeal Commission. Example Of The Simple Patent-A Official News with the Title of Invention: PROPEDER "Fire Fighting Robot Prototype"Keywords : Patent, DJHKI, PROPEDER.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document