Specific Notarial Protection of the Testator's Exclusive Rights: Kazakh and International Experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 770
Author(s):  
Karlygash Asilkhanovna JUMABAYEVA ◽  
Lola Furkatovna TATARINOVA ◽  
Gulnaz Tursunovna ALAYEVA ◽  
Saule Zhusupbekovna SULEIMENOVA ◽  
Danila Vladimirovich TATARINOV
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
International Experience ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Legal Practice ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

This study is concerned with one of the most burning issues of intellectual property rights, namely the notarial protection of the testator's exclusive rights. The article analyzes the Kazakh and international experience in solving this issue. In the course of the study, the authors obtained the following results: - In legal practice, the non-acceptance of inheritance and refusal to inherit exclusive rights have their specific features; - It is proposed to supplement the existing civil legislation on the protection of the testator's copyrights. ‘Kazakhstan Authors' Society’ conducts its activities in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Its main function is to manage the property rights of authors. This management includes the issuance of permits to use deliverables on behalf of authors, as well as the collection, distribution and payment of royalties. It has been established that a notary has the right to apply to ‘Kazakhstan Authors' Society’ to determine one's authorship. The authors have revealed that the current Kazakh legislation does not state the creation time of some deliverable and does not provide for the notarial certification of a web page (in case of copyright infringement). Thus, a notary takes measures to protect the intellectual property rights owned by the copyright holder that might become the subject of succession.

scholarly journals Peran Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Pencipta Lagu Dan Pemilik Hak Terkait

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-54
Author(s):  
Elly Hernawati
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Business Climate ◽  
Management Agency ◽  
Collective Management ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Right

Copyright is one of the Intellectual Property Rights components and should be paid attention to. Even more in technology era that developing, copyright protection needed to be enhanced, so that the right of creator, Copyright holder or owner of relevant rights can be protected and urge people to create. Indirectly, good and healthy business climate could be fostered.  Not all people have skill to create, that is why those people who have skill to create must be protected and even awarded, hoping that people urged to create. One of the creations that protected are song and music. In creating song or music, creator involve recording producer, music director or arranger. Regarding the creation, creator holds moral and economy rights, while parties involved hold the relevant rights to it. Collective Management Agency is an agency that help creator or relevant rights owner in managing and distributing the creation which is song or music that being commercialized. Yet the creator must be the member of the agency beforehand. Commercialization of a song or music by user can rise problem. Protection to the song or music is for the whole thing, including lyric, notation, arrangement and song title. The utilization of a song or music should be still protecting the parties that hold the copyright and the relevant right to it.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROPLEMS OF PROTECTION OF COPYRIGHT RIGHTS FROM PIRATES IN THE NETWORK OF INTERNET

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Микола Логвиненко ◽  
Анна Диковець
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Narrow Sense ◽  
Internet Piracy ◽  
The Right

 The article investigates the problem of copyright piracy. The concept of Internet piracy is disclosed, according to which this phenomenon can be considered, both in the broad, and in the narrow sense. Piracy in the narrow sense — activities related to the manufacture and mplementation of counterfeit copies. Considering piracy in the broad sense, it can be argued that the basis of this activity is the use of the object of copyright, without the permission of the right holders in order to profit. The signs of Internet piracy are identified, including: illegal use of copyrighted objects; realization of objects of copyright by publishing, reproduction, distribution and distribution without the consent of the author (the copyright holder); causing damage to the interests of the author (the right holder); commercialization; gaining profit or moral gain illegally. The classification of piracy has been carried out, which confirms the fact that the placement of copyright objects in the «network» is currently a very widespread phenomenon. Accordingly, piracy can be classified as: activity related to the partially legal disclosure of the object of copyright; activity that is related to the falsification of the copyright object; activities that are reflected in the illegal distribution of copies of the copyright object. The main ways of protecting copyright from piracy in the Internet in Ukraine and the problem issues in this area are determined. Accordingly, legal remedies can be applied in two forms — jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional. Jurisdictional form provides that the author (legal owner) has the right to apply to the court or other  competent or state bodies for the application of the necessary measures for the restoration of violated rights and the termination of the offense. Non-divisive way of protecting (self-defense) — the actions of a person in the protection of copyright, carried out by them on their own. Having analyzed the methods of protection, it was concluded that the non-irisbased form of protection provides more expeditious and cost-effective protection of the rights of the author. Jurisdictional way of protection is characterized by less efficiency.Because a considerable amount of time is spent on filing an action in court, hearing a complaint, making a decision and, finally, implementing this decision. The technical component of the non-jurisdiction form of protection is analyzed. Namely, technical methods of protection are defined, which can be attributed to: self-destruction of thecopyright object in case of illegal copying; placement of an object with limited functionality; use of watermarks; indication of copyrights on publications; etc. The proposals for amending the current legislation in the field of protection of copyright from piracy in the Internet are formulated. The changes should concern provisions affecting both legal and socioeconomic issues, namely: imperfection of legislation in the field of intellectual property rights (impossibility of reliable establishment of an offender who deals with Internet piracy; insufficiency of evidence base of copyright infringement; absence of judges and civil servants of specialist knowledge in the field of intellectual property rights); a highprice that makes it impossible to sell licensed products, hence, the number of sites that contain unlicensed products increases; insufficient level of financial provision of specialists who are professionals in the field of intellectual property; etc.

Exercise of economic intellectual property rights to wellknown trademarks.

2021 ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Olena Tverezenko
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
License Agreement ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
State Register ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The exercise of intellectual property rights is the realization bythe subject of intellectual property rights of moral and / or economic intellectual propertyrights, the content of which in relation to certain objects of intellectual propertyrights is determined by the Civil Code of Ukraine and other laws. The exercise of intellectualproperty rights is also the realization of economic intellectual propertyrights by other persons on the basis of the permission of the person who has the rightto allow the use of such object of intellectual property rights.The Law «On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine ConcerningStrengthening the Protection and Protection of Rights to Trademarks and IndustrialDesigns and Counteraction to Patent Trolling» (which entered into force on August16, 2020) has аmended the Law of Ukraine «On Protection of Rights to Marks forGoods and Services» (hereinafter — the Law). The amendments have removed theprovision that a well-known trademark receives the same legal protection as thetrademark for which the certificate is issued. Such changes have created a gap in thelegislation in part of defining what does the exercising of intellectual property rightsto well-known trademarks include.In this connection the following questions arise: (1) can the right to use a wellknownmark (as well as the mark for which the certificate is issued) be the subject ofa license agreement, a commercial concession agreement; (2) whether it is possible tocontribute economic intellectual property rights to a well-known trademark to the authorizedcapital of a legal entity; (3) whether it is possible to transfer such rights onthe basis of an agreement on the transfer of economic intellectual property rights or to provide as collateral. We believe that these issues should be addressed through theadoption of appropriate amendments to Art. 25 of the Law.In our opinion, the right to use a well-known trademark may be the subject of licenseagreements and commercial concession agreements. According to the currentlegislation of Ukraine, it is impossible to transfer economic intellectual propertyrights to a well-known mark to another person.It is expedient to make changes to Art. 25 of the Law, which would provide necessityof creation and functioning of the State register of Ukraine of well-knowntrade marks.The introduction of the proposed amendments to the legislation of Ukraine in thefield of economic intellectual property will help to improve the relevant legal relationsrelated to the exercise of property rights to well-known trademarks.Key words: trademark, well-known trademark, economic intellectual propertyrights, exercise of economic intellectual property rights, assignment (transfer) of economicrights of intellectual property

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK PENCIPTA SOFTWARE YANG NOMOR SERIALNYA DIKOMERSIALKAN TANPA HAK DI CYBER SPACE BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-87
Author(s):  
Billy Handiwiyanto ◽  
Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Cyber Space ◽  
The Right ◽  
Exclusive Right

Intellectual Property Rights consist of various types, one of which is Copyright, Copyright is one of the Intellectual Property Rights that has a broad scope of scope of objects, to the Copyright that is owned, the Author and / or the Copyright Holder get an Exclusive Right on the Work , in which this Exclusive Right consists of 2 (two) types, namely the Moral Right to the Work, and also the Economic Right to the Work. The right to exploit the Work rests with the Author and/or the Copyright Holder of the Work, but there are often violations of the Exclusive Rights in this case the Economic Right which is the Right of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder to obtain economic benefits from the utilization of the Copyright, in which a Work is commercialized without Rights by other Parties who do not have the Right to Commercialize the Work. This study aims to determine the basis of the Liability of those commercializing a Work without Rights, which violates the Exclusive Rights of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder to utilize the Work in order to obtain economic benefits from the Work. This research was conducted using the Normative Jurisdiction research method which examines a problem on the basis of applicable laws and regulations, as well as from views and doctrines in the science of law. The results of this study state that other parties who without the right to commercialize a Work must be held accountable for violating the Exclusive Rights in this case the Exclusive Rights to the Economic Rights of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder.Hak Kekayaan Intelektual terdiri dari berbagai macam jenis, salah satunya Hak Cipta, Hak Cipta merupakan salah satu Hak Kekayaan Intelektual yang memiliki ruang lingkup cakupan obyek yang luas, terhadap Hak Cipta yang dimiliki, Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta mendapatkan Hak Eksklusif atas Ciptaan tersebut, yang mana Hak Eksklusif ini terdiri dari 2 (dua) macam, yaitu Hak Moral atas Ciptaannya, dan juga Hak Ekonomi atas Ciptaan. Hak untuk mengeksploitasi Ciptaan tersebut terletak pada Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta dari Ciptaan tersebut, namun seringkali terjadi pelanggaran terhadap Hak Eksklusif yang dalam hal ini ialah Hak Ekonomi yang merupaan Hak dari si Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta untuk mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi dari pemanfaatan terhadap Hak Cipta tersebut, yang mana suatu Ciptaan dikomersialkan tanpa Hak oleh Pihak lain yang tidak punya Hak untuk Mengkomersialkan Ciptaan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar Tanggung Gugat dari pihak yang mengkomersialkan suatu Ciptaan tanpa Hak, yang melanggar Hak Eksklusif Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta untuk memanfaatkan Ciptaan tersebut guna mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi dari Ciptaan tersebut. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan metode penelitian Yuridis Normatif yang mana meneliti suatu masalah dengan dasar peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, juga dari pandangan-pandangan dan doktrin-doktrin dalam ilmu hukum. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa pihak lain yang dengan tanpa hak mengkomersialkan suatu Ciptaan harus bertanggung gugat karena melanggar Hak Eksklusif dalam hal ini Hak Eksklusif terhadap Hak Ekonomi dari Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta.

Interrelation of the realization of the right to participate in the cultural life of society with other rights

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-93
Author(s):  
Şəhriyar Rəhman oğlu Cəfərzadə ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Rights ◽  
Cultural Life ◽  
Community Information ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

As one of the basic human rights, the right to participate in the cultural life of community is intertwined with the number of human rights. When we analyze both the norms of international law and domestic norms, we see this feature of the law. Thus, in the norms of international law, creative freedom and intellectual property rights are considered together with the right to participate in cultural life. Although the Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan specifies the rights mentioned separately, the content of these norms connects these rights. Thus, both literary and artistic, as well as scientific and technical activities, which are part of creative freedom, are considered participation in cultural life. The implementation of these two activities creates intellectual property rights. Key words: human rights, intellectual property rights, cultural rights, right to participate in cultural life of community, information right, cultural right

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK CIPTA DARI PENGGUNAAN SEBAGAI DESAIN INDUSTRI (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 238 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2014)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umar Husin
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Industrial Design ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Tangent Point ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

<p>Intellectual Property Rights give the owner the right to enjoy the economic benefits of the creations produced. Copyright and Industrial Design are part of Intellectual Property Rights. The dispute between Copyright and Industrial Design is commonplace in the community known as the tangent point. Decision No. 238 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2014 is one of the results of a decision on the case of tangent copyright and industrial design, where the decision of the cassation considers the space for similar violations. Copyright is born automatically in realization without any registration and given to copyright holders, while protection for industrial design is not automatic because it is given in accordance with the registration of the new design. From the brief description above, it is obtained the formulation of the problem in the form of how to protect the law against the copyright holder and what factors can cause a dispute between copyright and industrial design.</p>

scholarly journals The specialist’s report as a prerequisite for proving infringement of intellectual property rights in criminal cases

2020 ◽  
pp. 318-323
Author(s):  
Yevhenii Kompanets
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
Use Of Knowledge

The article is devoted to the study of use of the specialist’s knowledge and the results of his participation in criminal proceedings(providing a report) as a means of proving the crimes towards intellectual property rights. The purpose of involvement of the specialistand tasks handled by the specialist during pre-trial investigation and trial have been considered. The legal status of the specialist hasbeen analyzed, vagueness and incompleteness of the specialist’s rights have been emphasized, absence of the mechanism of involvement of the specialist and the procedure of formalizing the results of his/her participation in criminal proceedings has been stated. Ithas been proved why in the majority of cases the specialist of the right holder/official manufacturer serves as the subject of applyingspecial knowledge in the crimes related to infringement of intellectual property rights.The practice of use of the specialist’s knowledge (providing a report) in the course of pre-trial investigation, trial and evaluationof the specialist’s report by the courts, including ECtHR has been provided. Decision of ECtHR stresses the importance of recognitionand evaluation of the specialist’s report as evidence, it is of universal significance for all parties to the criminal proceedings and it willstrengthen their positions. The possibility of use of knowledge of the specialist (right holder/official manufacturer) not only in thecourse of investigative actions has been substantiated.Amendments to the CPC of Ukraine are proposed, which are aimed at simplifying proving and increasing the efficiency of pretrialinvestigation body in crimes of this category, namely to elaborate and expand the rights/the list of actions of the specialist (examinationof items/documents), to determine the mechanism of involving the specialist, to include the specialist’s report in the list of documents,which serve as written evidence.

scholarly journals Protection of Intellectual Property Rights by Customs Aythorities

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-46
Author(s):  
L.V. Zolota ◽  
O.V. Ulizko
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Industrial Design ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Counterfeit Goods ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Counterfeit Products ◽  
Simplified Procedure ◽  
The Right

The article deals with the issue of protection of intellectual property rights by customs authorities. The current problems of infringement of intellectual property rights during moving across the customs border of Ukraine are considered, in particular: transportation of counterfeit products, which includes goods that are subject to infringement of intellectual property rights to the trademark and goods that are the subject of infringement of intellectual property rights to a geographical indication in Ukraine and pirated products, which includes goods that are the subject of infringement of copyright and / or related rights or intellectual property rights to a registered industrial design in Ukraine and which are or contain copies made without the consent of the copyright and related rights or intellectual property rights to the industrial design or a person authorized by such right holder in the country of production, as well as moving across the customs border of small consignments of goods with violation of customs legislation and introduction of simplified procedure for destruction of such goods. The article also analyzes issues of novelty of the Ukrainian legislation – “original goods”, that is, those that were made with the consent of the right holder, as a basis for the existence of the international principle of exhaustion of intellectual property rights. It has been established that national legislation does not sufficiently protect intellectual property rights and that Ukraine remains one of the four points of transit and transit of counterfeit goods to the European Union. The mechanism of regulation of compensation of costs in connection with storage of goods suspected of violation of intellectual property rights after all, the owner of the rights has the opportunity to demand compensation for these costs from the owner of goods that violate his intellectual property rights, as well as the destruction of such goods by the owner of intellectual property rights. Key words: intellectual property rights, customs border, promotion of protection of intellectual property rights, procedure for destruction of goods, counterfeit goods.

scholarly journals KEEPING THE NATION'S ASSETS THROUGH THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF COPYRIGHT WORKS OF CULTURE

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-71
Author(s):  
Zulkifli Makkawaru
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Literature And Science ◽  
Community Rights ◽  
Art And Culture ◽  
The Right

Indonesia positioned copyright art and culture based on its strength as a nation or community rights over an Alliance grouping of the society which can give the effect of distortions in its protection. Which institution can be megurus and oversee the interests between countriesCultivate ideas/ideas in the fields of art, literature and science in the context of intellectual property rights (HKI) categorized into areas of HKI named Copyright (Copyright). The scope of the rights provided for the protection of copyright in the context of this very broad following elements known in several countries. There is a different understanding about the copyright status of culture from both the substance of the right nor of the appreciation of the case which threatens foreign claims copyright over the culture of Indonesia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document