scholarly journals Fragmentation and dewatering transform Great Plains stream fish communities

2015 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshuah S. Perkin ◽  
Keith B. Gido ◽  
Arthur R. Cooper ◽  
Thomas F. Turner ◽  
Megan J. Osborne ◽  
...  
1984 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip R. Yant ◽  
James R. Karr ◽  
Paul L. Angermeier

Copeia ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 1991 (3) ◽  
pp. 659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt D. Fausch ◽  
Robert G. Bramblett

<em>Abstract</em>.—Stream fishes carry out their life histories across broad spatial and temporal scales, leading to spatially structured populations. Therefore, incorporating metapopulation dynamics into models of stream fish populations may improve our ability to understand mechanisms regulating them. First, we reviewed empirical research on metapopulation dynamics in the stream fish ecology literature and found 31 papers that used the metapopulation framework. The majority of papers applied no specific metapopulation model, or included space only implicitly. Although parameterization of spatially realistic models is challenging, we suggest that stream fish ecologists should incorporate space into models and recognize that metapopulation types may change across scales. Second, we considered metacommunity theory, which addresses how trade-offs among dispersal, environmental heterogeneity, and biotic interactions structure communities across spatial scales. There are no explicit tests of metacommunity theory using stream fishes to date, so we used data from our research in a Great Plains stream to test the utility of these paradigms. We found that this plains fish metacommunity was structured mainly by spatial factors related to dispersal opportunity and, to a lesser extent, by environmental heterogeneity. Currently, metacommunity models are more heuristic than predictive. Therefore, we propose that future stream fish metacommunity research should focus on developing testable hypotheses that incorporate stream fish life history attributes, and seasonal environmental variability, across spatial scales. This emerging body of research is likely to be valuable not only for basic stream fish ecological research, but also multispecies conservation and management.


Author(s):  
Katelyn B.S. King ◽  
Mary Tate Bremigan ◽  
Dana M Infante ◽  
Kendra Spence Cheruvelil

Stream and lake fishes are important economic and recreational resources that respond to alterations in their surrounding watersheds and serve as indicators of ecological stressors on aquatic ecosystems. Research suggests that fish species diversity is largely influenced by surface water connectivity, or the lack thereof; however, few studies consider freshwater connections and their effect on both lake and stream fish communities across broad spatial extents. We used fish data from 559 lakes and 854 streams from the midwestern/northeastern United States to examine the role of surface water connectivity on fish species richness and community composition. We found that although lakes and streams share many species, connectivity had a positive effect on species richness across lakes and streams and helped explain species composition. Taking an integrated approach that includes both lake and stream fish communities and connectivity among freshwaters helps inform scientific understanding of what drives variation in fish species diversity at broad spatial scales and can help managers who are faced with planning for state, regional, or national scale monitoring and restoration.


Hydrobiologia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 651 (1) ◽  
pp. 279-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio R. Silva ◽  
Efrem J. G. Ferreira ◽  
Cláudia P. de Deus

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 583 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina B. Valério ◽  
Yzel Rondon Súarez ◽  
Thiago R. A. Felipe ◽  
Karina K. Tondato ◽  
Lidiani Q. L. Ximenes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document