scholarly journals Creating An “Invitational Classroom” In The Online Educational Milieu

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-16
Author(s):  
Beth Perry ◽  
Margaret Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Strategies ◽  
Classroom Environment ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Online Classroom ◽  
Innovative Teaching ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
The Arts ◽  
Class Environment ◽  
Parker Palmer

Parker Palmer, a scholar who studied effective face-to-face teaching, introduced the term the “invitational classroom” (1993, p. 71). In particular Palmer emphasized that “an air of hospitality” facilitated an inviting educational environment (p. 71). Hospitality in Palmer’s words means “receiving each other, our struggles, our newborn ideas, with openness and care” (p. 74). Palmer concludes that both teachers and learners experience positive consequence when the class environment is invitational. This paper explores a category of innovative teaching strategies, called artistic pedagogical technologies (APTs) that facilitate the experience of an invitational classroom in online courses (Perry & Edwards, 2010). APTs are teaching strategies founded in the arts. APTs described in this paper include photovoice, parallel poetry, and conceptual quilting. A study of the effect of these APTs on graduate students and instructors from a Canadian online university is described. The data collection and data analysis processes used in the study are detailed. Both students and instructors found the online classroom environment changed in a positive way in part because of APTs. Research participants reported that APTs initiated, sustained, and enhanced interactions among students and between students and the instructors (Perry & Edwards, 2010). These findings are analyzed using Palmer’s concepts of hospitality and the invitational classroom and Wenger’s Social Theory of Learning (1990). Practical ideas for educators regarding the use of APTS in teaching and course design are reviewed. 

The Pedagogy of Teaching Online Graduate Courses in the Program of Applied Anthropology

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariela Nuñez-Janes ◽  
Alicia Re Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Classroom Environment ◽  
Graduate Program ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Applied Anthropology ◽  
Master's Program ◽  
Online Classroom ◽  
Teaching Online ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Praxis Ii ◽  
Anthropology Of Education

Perhaps one of the most recurring questions that we and others have asked about our online graduate program is: How do you foster critical thinking in an online classroom environment? Most of us were initially apprehensive about the idea of an Online Master's Program in Applied Anthropology because we felt that the critical dialogue characteristic of our face-to-face graduate classes might be lost in a virtual environment. In this article, we would like to discuss how we worked through the fear of loosing a critical pedagogical edge by focusing on some of the strategies used by Mariela Nuñez-Janes and Alicia Re Cruz as they developed their online courses. Mariela just completed designing her class about the Anthropology of Education. Alicia will start teaching Theory and Praxis II and Migrants & Refugees during the 2006-2007 academic year.

scholarly journals Face-to-face to online: PhD academic writing @Maastricht University

2020 ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Neill Wylie
Keyword(s):  
Academic Writing ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
Innovative Teaching ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Strong Focus ◽  
Writing Course ◽  
The Face ◽  
Language Needs

Maastricht University (UM) has a distinct global perspective and a strong focus on innovation. UM offers an array of PhD courses to distance and campus based students who have access to elective, credit bearing modules and the language needs of these students are catered for by the Language Centre. Many PhD candidates choose to take an academic writing course in their first or second year of their degree. In recent years, demand for a more student focused, flexible academic writing course has grown. In line with UM’s policy of supporting innovative teaching practices, the Language Centre’s face-to-face PhD academic writing course, PhD Writing 1, has been transformed into a fully online course containing eight interactive webinar sessions named Online PhD Writing, which runs in addition to the face-to-face rendition. On the back of the success of this course, coupled with increased demand for a follow up course, this author was tasked with creating an advanced online PhD academic writing course to cater for global students with diverse time zones and schedules. This paper evaluates the challenges posed and the advances made in constructing both online courses and explores the technologies used in implementing them.

Video Design for Online Courses

2022 ◽  
pp. 587-612
Author(s):  
Eyup Yünkül
Keyword(s):  
Classroom Environment ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Traditional Teaching ◽  
Digital Learning ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Technology In The Classroom ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Digital Material ◽  
Educational Videos ◽  
Digital Learning Resources

With the widespread use of instructional technology in the classroom environment, learning materials are designed according to the interests and needs of learners at different levels. These materials offer flexibility to learners and teachers about time and space. In the information age we live in, many digital materials are used to make learning more effective and permanent. When it comes to digital material, digital texts, videos, presentations, simulations, and animations come to mind. Videos that appeal to both visual and auditory senses appear as important teaching materials. Educational videos, one of the important digital learning resources, are also used in both traditional teaching and contemporary learning approaches. Many studies have shown that educational videos are a very important learning tool in face-to-face and online learning environments. In this context, the aim of this chapter is to talk about the design of educational videos that can be used in online courses in accordance with the principles of multimedia.

Knowledge Acquisition in a Hybrid Graduate Teacher Training Program

2010 ◽  
pp. 317-326
Author(s):  
Thanh T. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Classroom Management ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Knowledge Acquisition ◽  
Online Teaching ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Online Classroom ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Course Materials

How can one leverage the technological benefits of an online classroom without losing both the interpersonal advantages of face-to-face contact and pedagogically sound classroom management techniques? A blended learning environment, combining both traditional face-to-face and online interaction, is a valid higher-education solution that many instructors are adopting in place of 100% online teaching environments. Like total online courses, blended courses offer students the convenience of online access to both lecture/course materials and asynchronous classroom discussions. However, the key feature of a blended learning environment is the ability to use traditional face-to-face sessions to foster and stimulate an online social culture that facilitates knowledge acquisition through interpersonal and group discussion and disclosure. This study examines pedagogical, social and demographic factors that contribute to students’ knowledge acquisition in an 80-20 (80% online and 20% in-class) blended learning environment.

scholarly journals Online versus Face-to-Face: Students' Preferences for College Course Attributes

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Mann ◽  
Shida R. Henneberry
Keyword(s):  
Course Design ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Course Selection ◽  
Online Course Design ◽  
Design Technology ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Early Afternoon ◽  
College Course ◽  
Attribute Information

The objectives of this article were to determine: 1) students' preferences for college course attributes; and 2) how the amount of course attribute information impacts enrollment. Results indicate students had the highest preferences for face-to-face (F2F) courses offered late morning and early afternoon and two to three days per week. Students selected online over F2F courses depending on course makeup; for example, course topic, online course design technology, and when the F2F version was offered. Additionally, students selected online courses more frequently when additional online course attribute information was available during course selection.

scholarly journals ACADEMIC DISHONESTY IN TRADITIONAL AND ONLINE CLASSROOMS: DOES THE “MEDIA EQUATION” HOLD TRUE?

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3-4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik W. Black ◽  
Joe Greaser ◽  
Kara Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Academic Dishonesty ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Online Classroom ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Traditional Courses ◽  
Online Classrooms ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Relationship

Limited empirical research exists regarding the prevalence of academic dishonesty in the online classroom. This limited evidence supports the notion that factors contributing to academic dishonesty in the traditional classroom also apply to online courses. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between factors known to contribute to academic dishonesty in traditional courses with undergraduate students’ perceptions of cheating in online courses. 1068 undergraduates enrolled in online courses completed a survey exploring factors known to contribute to academic dishonesty in face-to-face classes and their perception of their peers’ level of cheating in online courses. Researchers employed bivariate correlations and multiple regression on data obtained from these students. Results suggest factors known to contribute to academic dishonesty in face-to-face classes have little influence in online courses, and results suggest that future research needs to consider whether students who engage in online learning have different ideas about what constitutes cheating.

ACADEMIC DISHONESTY IN TRADITIONAL AND ONLINE CLASSROOMS: DOES THE “MEDIA EQUATION” HOLD TRUE?

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Greaser ◽  
Erik W Black ◽  
Kara Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Academic Dishonesty ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Traditional Classroom ◽  
Online Classroom ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Traditional Courses ◽  
Online Classrooms ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Relationship

Limited empirical research exists regarding the prevalence of academic dishonesty in the online classroom. This limited evidence supports the notion that factors contributing to academic dishonesty in the traditional classroom also apply to online courses. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between factors known to contribute to academic dishonesty in traditional courses with undergraduate students’ perceptions of cheating in online courses. 1068 undergraduates enrolled in online courses completed a survey exploring factors known to contribute to academic dishonesty in face-to-face classes and their perception of their peers’ level of cheating in online courses. Researchers employed bivariate correlations and multiple regression on data obtained from the sample of 1068 students. Results suggest factors known to contribute to academic dishonesty in face-to-face classes have little influence in online courses and suggest students who engage in online learning may have differing ideals as to what constitutes cheating.

Engaging Online K-12 Students

2019 ◽  
pp. 193-212
Author(s):  
Jean Kiekel ◽  
Serena Flores ◽  
Nicole McZeal Walters
Keyword(s):  
School Leadership ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Career Readiness ◽  
College And Career Readiness ◽  
Online Classroom ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
World Languages ◽  
Emotional Distance ◽  
Online Setting ◽  
K 12

Online learning for K-12 is the fastest growing segment of education. Advantages include access to courses for college and career readiness; world languages; science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), including electives that might otherwise be unavailable to students. However, K-12 students increasingly miss valuable interactions present in face-to-face classes and, as such, engaging students in online courses can be difficult. For this reason, teachers in an online setting must be flexible and creative and find approaches to make the online classroom feel more like a face-to-face classroom. This would include finding ways to decrease the cognitive and emotional distance often associated with not seeing a teacher or fellow students. It also presents the case of school leadership need for exercising caution while implementing school policy to encourage appropriate social media behaviors.

Designing Online Courses to Promote Student Retention

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Dietz-Uhler ◽  
Amy Fisher ◽  
Andrea Han
Keyword(s):  
Student Retention ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Quality Matters ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Online Distance Learning ◽  
Online Distance

Although the issue of student retention is a campus-wide one, it is of special interest in online distance learning courses, where retention rates are reported to be lower than in face-to-face classes. Among the explanations and theories of retention rates in online courses, one that struck us as most useful is a structural one, namely, course design. The question we raise is, can online course designs promote student retention? In this article, we report on how we used Quality Matters to design and revise online courses in psychology and statistics. Quality Matters, a research-based initiative, advocates the use of eight general review standards to review online courses. In our psychology and statistics courses, our retention rate across multiple offerings of both courses is approximately 95%.

Video Technology for Academic Integrity in Online Courses

2011 ◽  
pp. 289-300
Author(s):  
Judith Szerdahelyi
Keyword(s):  
Academic Dishonesty ◽  
Academic Integrity ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Academic Misconduct ◽  
Video Production ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Two Factors

In addition to their traditional low-tech repertoire of cheating methods, students are now compromising academic integrity by utilizing sophisticated high-tech innovations to improve their grades. The inexperience of online faculty can also contribute to students’ academic misconduct when instructors employ a course design and/or assessment measures that are more appropriate for face-to-face courses. This chapter discusses how easy it is for students to “fake a course” and earn a grade in an online class without acquiring knowledge if a combination of two factors are present: 1) Using pedagogical tools unsuitable for measuring online performance, and 2) Violations of academic integrity. The purpose of the chapter is to present new methods of utilizing multimedia technology, more specifically student video production, to reduce the possibility of academic dishonesty and to improve the quality of teaching and learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document