scholarly journals Percutaneous Extraction of a Migrated WATCHMAN™ Device After Seven Months

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 4572-4574
Author(s):  
Abhishek Maan ◽  
Mohit Turagam ◽  
Srinivas Dukkipati ◽  
Vivek Reddy
1978 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICHARD G. FISHER ◽  
KENNETH L. MATTOX

Author(s):  
StevenJ. Smith ◽  
Carl Vyborny ◽  
RobertL. Vogelzang

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 1033-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ojanguren ◽  
Francesco Doenz ◽  
Salah D. Qanadli ◽  
David C. Madoff ◽  
Nermin Halkic ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Streem ◽  
M. G. Zelch ◽  
B. Risius ◽  
M. A. Geisinger

1993 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali OTO ◽  
S. Lale TOKGOZOGLU ◽  
A. ORAM ◽  
Giray KABAKCI ◽  
Oguz CAYMAZ ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 154 (3) ◽  
pp. 828-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
A T Young ◽  
D W Hunter ◽  
P Lange ◽  
G B Lund ◽  
W R Castaneda-Zuniga ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Jonathan M Behar ◽  
Malcolm C Finlay ◽  
Edward Rowland ◽  
Vivienne Ezzat ◽  
Simon Sporton ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) involves the placement of an epicardial left ventricular (LV) lead through the coronary venous tree. However, alternative approaches of delivering CRT have been sought for patients who fail to respond to conventional methods or for those where coronary venous anatomy is unfavourable. Biventricular pacing through an endocardial LV lead has potential advantages; however, the long-term clinical and safety data are not known. Case summary This article details a case series of four patients with endocardial LV leads; three of these for previously failed conventional CRT and a fourth for an inadvertently placed defibrillator lead. Discussion We describe the clinical course and adverse events associated with left-sided leads and subsequently describe the safe and feasible method of percutaneous extraction.


Heart Rhythm ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. S201-S202
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Schulze ◽  
Jon A. Grammes ◽  
Christine S. Saari ◽  
Bharat Kantharia ◽  
Michelle J. Vrabel ◽  
...  

Antibiotics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Caiati ◽  
Paolo Pollice ◽  
Mario Erminio Lepera ◽  
Stefano Favale

Lead pacemaker infection is a complication on the rise. An infected oscillating mass attached to the leads (ILV) is a common finding in this setting. Percutaneous extraction of the leads and of the device is the best curative option. However, extraction of leads with large masses can be complicated by pulmonary embolism. The aim of this study was to understand the factors associated with large ILV using a sophisticated ultrasound technique to visualize the masses, namely intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), and investigate whether larger masses induce more complications during and after extraction. Percutaneous lead extraction and peri-procedural ICE were done in 36 patients (pts) (75 ± 11 years old, 74% males). Vegetations (max dimension = 8.2 ± 4.1 mm) in the right cavity were found in 26 of them, mostly adhering to the leads. We subdivided the patients into 2 groups: with vegetation size < 1 cm (18 pts) and vegetation size ≥ 1 cm (8 pts). By univariate analysis, we found that patients in group 1 were more often taking anticoagulation therapy (p = 0.03, Phi (Phi coefficient) = −0.5, OR [odds ratio] 0.071) and had signs of local pocket infection (p = 0.02, Phi = −0.52, OR 0.059) while significantly more patients in group 2 had diabetes (p = 0.08, Phi = 0.566, OR 15); moreover the patients in group 2 showed a trend toward a more frequent positive blood culture (p = 0.08, Phi = 0.39, OR 5.8) and infection with coagulase negative staphylococci (p = 0.06, Phi = 0.46, OR 8.3). At multivariate analysis, only 3 factors (diabetes, younger age and anticoagulation therapy) were independently associated with ILV size: diabetes, associated with larger vegetations (group 2), showed the largest beta value (0.44, p = 0.008); age was inversely correlated with ILV size (beta value = −32, p = 0.038), and anticoagulation therapy (beta value = −029, p = 0.048) was more commonly associated with smaller vegetations (group 1). Larger ILV were not associated with more complications or death during or after the extraction. Conclusion: diabetes, anticoagulation therapy and age are independent predictors of lead vegetation size. The embolic potential of large ILV during extraction was modest, so ILVs >1cm are not a contraindication to percutaneous extraction of infected leads.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document