scholarly journals EduCamp Colombia: Social networked learning for teacher training

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Ernesto Leal Fonseca
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environments ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Collective Learning ◽  
Social Software ◽  
Networked Learning ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Interaction Processes ◽  
E Learning

This paper describes a learning experience called EduCamp, which was launched by the Ministry of Education of Colombia in 2007, based on emerging concepts such as e-Learning 2.0, connectivism, and personal learning environments. An EduCamp proposes an unstructured collective learning experience, which intends to make palpable the possibilities of social software tools in learning and interaction processes while demonstrating face-to-face organizational forms that reflect social networked learning ideas. The experience opens new perspectives for the design of technology training workshops and for the development of lifelong learning experiences.

Social Software and E-Learning

2007 ◽  
pp. 228-247
Author(s):  
Jon Dron
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Social Software ◽  
Learning Trajectory ◽  
Online Learning Environment ◽  
Networked Learning ◽  
E Learning

This book offers an exploration of the ways that a learning trajectory is determined, and, in particular, how an online learning environment can affect that trajectory. It provides suggestions about how, primarily through technologies that underlie what is vulgarly known as “Web 2.0,” networked learning environments should be constructed to give control to learners if they need it, as they need it, and when they need it.

Problems with Social Software for E-Learning

2007 ◽  
pp. 294-309
Author(s):  
Jon Dron
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Social Software ◽  
Learning Trajectory ◽  
Online Learning Environment ◽  
Networked Learning ◽  
E Learning

This book offers an exploration of the ways that a learning trajectory is determined, and, in particular, how an online learning environment can affect that trajectory. It provides suggestions about how, primarily through technologies that underlie what is vulgarly known as “Web 2.0,” networked learning environments should be constructed to give control to learners if they need it, as they need it, and when they need it.

Design Principles for Social Software in E-Learning

2007 ◽  
pp. 248-270
Author(s):  
Jon Dron
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Social Software ◽  
Learning Trajectory ◽  
Online Learning Environment ◽  
Networked Learning ◽  
E Learning

This book offers an exploration of the ways that a learning trajectory is determined, and, in particular, how an online learning environment can affect that trajectory. It provides suggestions about how, primarily through technologies that underlie what is vulgarly known as “Web 2.0,” networked learning environments should be constructed to give control to learners if they need it, as they need it, and when they need it.

Back to the Future

2010 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Dabbagh ◽  
Rick Reo
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Social Learning ◽  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Developmental Perspective ◽  
Social Software ◽  
Networked Learning ◽  
Learning Contexts ◽  
The Future ◽  
E Learning

This chapter provides a developmental perspective on Web 2.0 and social software by tracing the historical, theoretical, and technological events of the last century that led to the emergence—or re-emergence, rather—of these powerful and transformative tools in a big way. The specific goals of the chapter are firstly, to describe the evolution of social software and related pedagogical constructs from pre- and early Internet networked learning environments to current Web 2.0 applications, and secondly, to discuss the theoretical underpinnings of social learning environments and the pedagogical implications and affordances of social software in e-learning contexts. The chapter ends with a social software use framework that can be used to facilitate the application of customized and personalized e-learning experiences in higher education.

Social Software in E-Learning

2007 ◽  
pp. 271-293
Author(s):  
Jon Dron
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Social Software ◽  
Learning Trajectory ◽  
Online Learning Environment ◽  
Networked Learning ◽  
E Learning

This book offers an exploration of the ways that a learning trajectory is determined, and, in particular, how an online learning environment can affect that trajectory. It provides suggestions about how, primarily through technologies that underlie what is vulgarly known as “Web 2.0,” networked learning environments should be constructed to give control to learners if they need it, as they need it, and when they need it.

scholarly journals Bringing academics on board: Encouraging institution-wide diffusion of e-learning environments

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn Birch ◽  
Bruce Burnett
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Learning Objects ◽  
Multimodal Learning ◽  
Tertiary Sector ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Information Communications Technology ◽  
E Learning ◽  
The University

<span>Rapid advances in educational and information communications technology (ICT) have encouraged some educators to move beyond traditional face to face and distance education correspondence modes toward a rich, technology mediated e-learning environment. Ready access to multimedia at the desktop has provided the opportunity for educators to develop flexible, engaging and interactive learning resources incorporating multimedia and hypermedia. However, despite this opportunity, the adoption and integration of educational technologies by academics across the tertiary sector has typically been slow. This paper presents the findings of a qualitative study that investigated factors influencing the manner in which academics adopt and integrate educational technology and ICT. The research was conducted at a regional Australian university, the University of Southern Queensland (USQ), and focused on the development of e-learning environments. These e-learning environments include a range of multimodal learning objects and multiple representations of content that seek to cater for different learning styles and modal preferences, increase interaction, improve learning outcomes, provide a more inclusive and equitable curriculum and more closely mirror the on campus learning experience. This focus of this paper is primarily on the barriers or inhibitors academics reported in the study, including institutional barriers, individual inhibitors and pedagogical concerns. Strategies for addressing these obstacles are presented and implications and recommendations for educational institutions are discussed.</span>

scholarly journals Beyond e-learning: from blended methodology to transmedia education

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Favrin ◽  
Elisabetta Gola ◽  
Emiliano Ilardi
Keyword(s):  
New Media ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Educational Activity ◽  
Dynamic Learning ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Convergence Culture ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Collaborative Working ◽  
The University ◽  
Traditional Activity

Abstract Nowadays, at the time of convergence culture, social network, and transmedia storytelling – when social interactions are constantly remediated – e-learning, especially in universities, should be conceived as a sharing educational activity. Different learning experiences should become smoother and able to fade out the closed learning environments (as software platform and classrooms (either virtual or not)). In this paper, we will show some experiences of the Communication Sciences degree program of the University of Cagliari, which is supplied through an e-learning method. In the ten years since its foundation, the approach has evolved from a blended learning with two kinds of traditional activity (online activities and face-to-face lessons) to a much more dynamic learning experience. Many new actors (communication companies, local government, public-service corporations, new media and social media) – indeed – have been involved in educational and teaching process. But also these processes changed: collaborative working, new media comprehension, self-guided problem solving are examples of the new literacies and approaches that can be reached as new learning objectives.

scholarly journals The de.NBI / ELIXIR-DE training platform - Bioinformatics training in Germany and across Europe within ELIXIR

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1877
Author(s):  
Daniel Wibberg ◽  
Bérénice Batut ◽  
Peter Belmann ◽  
Jochen Blom ◽  
Frank Oliver Glöckner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Training Program ◽  
Life Sciences ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Training Courses ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Training Activities ◽  
Bioinformatics Community

The German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure (de.NBI) is a national and academic infrastructure funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). The de.NBI provides (i) service, (ii) training, and (iii) cloud computing to users in life sciences research and biomedicine in Germany and Europe and (iv) fosters the cooperation of the German bioinformatics community with international network structures. The de.NBI members also run the German node (ELIXIR-DE) within the European ELIXIR infrastructure. The de.NBI / ELIXIR-DE training platform, also known as special interest group 3 (SIG 3) ‘Training & Education’, coordinates the bioinformatics training of de.NBI and the German ELIXIR node. The network provides a high-quality, coherent, timely, and impactful training program across its eight service centers. Life scientists learn how to handle and analyze biological big data more effectively by applying tools, standards and compute services provided by de.NBI. Since 2015, more than 300 training courses were carried out with about 6,000 participants and these courses received recommendation rates of almost 90% (status as of July 2020). In addition to face-to-face training courses, online training was introduced on the de.NBI website in 2016 and guidelines for the preparation of e-learning material were established in 2018. In 2016, ELIXIR-DE joined the ELIXIR training platform. Here, the de.NBI / ELIXIR-DE training platform collaborates with ELIXIR in training activities, advertising training courses via TeSS and discussions on the exchange of data for training events essential for quality assessment on both the technical and administrative levels. The de.NBI training program trained thousands of scientists from Germany and beyond in many different areas of bioinformatics.

e-Learning in the Cloud

2012 ◽  
pp. 10-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niall Sclater
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environments ◽  
Virtual Learning Environment ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Learning Tools ◽  
It Services ◽  
Institutional Policies ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Personal Learning Environments ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Levels Of Service

Elearning has grown rapidly in importance for institutions and has been largely facilitated through the “walled garden” of the virtual learning environment. Meanwhile many students are creating their own personal learning environments by combining the various Web 2.0 services they find most useful. Cloud computing offers new opportunities for institutions to provide dynamic and up-to-date Internet-based, e-learning applications while ensuring high levels of service, and compliance with institutional policies and legislation. The cloud is rapidly evolving in its architecture, the services offered and the logistics of deployment. It brings with it risks but also possibilities for learners and for educational institutions to reduce costs and enhance services. It is likely to severely disrupt the business model developed by existing vendors of VLEs who provide an integrated suite of e-learning tools, installed and maintained by the institution’s IT services department.

eLearning in the Cloud

2010 ◽  
pp. 661-670
Author(s):  
Niall Sclater
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environments ◽  
Virtual Learning Environment ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Learning Tools ◽  
It Services ◽  
Institutional Policies ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Personal Learning Environments ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Levels Of Service

Elearning has grown rapidly in importance for institutions and has been largely facilitated through the “walled garden” of the virtual learning environment. Meanwhile many students are creating their own personal learning environments by combining the various Web 2.0 servicesthey find most useful. Cloud computing offers new opportunities for institutions to provide dynamic and up-to-date Internet-based, e-learning applications while ensuring high levels of service, and compliance with institutional policies and legislation. The cloud is rapidly evolving in its architecture, the services offered and the logistics of deployment. It brings with it risks but also possibilities for learners and for educational institutions to reduce costs and enhance services. It is likely to severely disrupt thebusiness model developed by existing vendors of VLEs who provide an integrated suite of e-learning tools, installed and maintained by the institution’s IT services department.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document