scholarly journals Podmioty gminne w prawie zamówień publicznych

2018 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 281-290
Author(s):  
Maciej Guziński

MUNICIPAL ENTITIES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT LAWIn the implementation of public tasks in the form of commissioning construction works, services, deliveries by way of a paid contract, municipal entities act as awarding entities — entities awarding a public contract. Municipal entities may also act as economic operators — entities applying for the implementation of the contract in question. In both situations they are subject to the public procurement law regime.

2003 ◽  
pp. 68-80
Author(s):  
A. Dementiev ◽  
A. Zolotareva ◽  
A. Reus

The most important measures stimulating the increase of efficiency and effectiveness of budget expenditures on road construction are the improvement of pricing mechanisms and increasing efficiency of the procedures of government purchases of goods, works and services. The paper includes the analysis of main problems that arise in the process of government purchases and construction pricing with the reference to budget expenditure on road construction. It includes the review and analysis of international experience and possible measures of increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of government purchases and (road) construction pricing in Russia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-357
Author(s):  
Theodora Pritadianing Saputri

It is internationally accepted that public procurement procedure and public contract shall be organized in accordance with the fair competition principle and fulfil the requirement of transparency. Public procurement regulations are necessary to secure the efficient use of taxpayer resources by the government in purchasing goods, services and works from the market and to ensure fair competition among the public contract should be protected and that therefore it would be necessary to amend existing regulations which prohibit or restrict this right derived from freedom of contract.  In addition, law makers should also put in place restriction with regard to corporate restructuring which main intention is to circumvent requirements of tender documents.


Teisė ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 98-117
Author(s):  
Deividas Soloveičikas ◽  
Karolis Šimanskis

Viešojo pirkimo sutarties negaliojimas, kaip tiekėjo teisių gynimo priemonė vykdant viešuosius pirkimus, yra svarbus teisinis elementas, siekiant plėtoti veiksmingą teisių gynimo priemonių sistemą. Todėl tik laikas lėmė, kada šis institutas bus įtvirtintas Europos Sąjungos ir valstybių narių, įskaitant Lietuvos, viešųjų pirkimų teisėje. Siekiant didžiausio teisinio efekto įgyvendinant viešojo pirkimo sutarties negaliojimo institutą, yra svarbu lyginamuoju požiūriu ištirti, kokios yra šios priemonės teisinės kaitos prielaidos, kaip ji reglamentuojama Europos Sąjungos ir nacionalinėje viešųjų pirkimų teisėje, kokių tikslų siekiama tokiu teisiniu reguliavimu ir kokią įtaką toks reglamentavimas turi bendrai tiekėjų teisių gynimo sistemai. Tai ir yra aptariama šiame moksliniame straipsnyje.In effectiveness of a public contract as the remedy in public procurement procedures is a an element of a great importance in the light of the development of the effective remedies’system. Therefore, naturally this was only a question of time when this legal tool appears within the public procurement law of the European Unijon and Lithuania. While seeking for the greatest positive impact of the ineffectiveness in a legal practice it is important to make a comparative anglysis of the preconditions for its evolution, what the legal regulation within the law of public procurement of EU and Lithuania is, as well as what the purposes of such regulation are including the general influence the latter has on the whole remedies’system. This article is oriented towards the pursue of these goals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (8) ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
Bójko Justyna

The COVID-19 epidemic does not stop investment processes. Moreover, the stimulation of the economy will consist, inter alia, in the strong stimulation of the public investment sector. Therefore, entrepreneurs who currently meet the challenges will not cease to fulfill their obligations and will meet the contractual conditions have a chance to implement further contracts - otherwise, they risk being excluded from future proceedings.


Author(s):  
Pauline Debono

The terms governing the provision of supplies, services, or works by an economic operator to a governmental entity are set into a public contract that is signed, following a procurement process. This article explores whether the public administration can utilise smart contracts to incorporate the terms governing the provision of supplies, services, or works. The fundamental elements of a contract are assessed, in order to determine whether a smart contract can be considered as fulfilling these requirements. Following this assessment, the main hurdles to the use of smart contracting are examined and a possible solution proposed. The case for utilising smart contracting within the realm of public procurement is finally advocated.


Author(s):  
Cristina Clementina ARENAS ALEGRÍA

LABURPENA: Kontratu publiko baten egikaritzaren testuinguruan, arrazoi edo kausa jakin batzuk gerta daitezke, haren izaera alda dezaketenak, aldaketa batzuk egin behar izateraino. Halakoetan, kontrajarrita gerta daitezke, alde batetik, kontratu bati eusteak berez duen interes publikoa, aldaketaren bat egin behar bazaio ere, eta bestetik, kontratuaren aurretiazko suntsiarazpena, hitzartutako prestazioa burutu ezin delako. Egoera horretan, legelari espainiarrek nahiz europarrek alde batera zein bestera jo izan dute. Legedi espainiarra, Ekonomia Jasangarrirako Legea iritsi arte, oso epel agertu zen, kontratu-aldaketen kontrolari zegokionez. Behin kontratazioari buruzko 2014ko zuzentarauak onartuta, transposizioa egin behar zitzaien, eta hasitako ildoari jarraipena eman, alegia, kontratuen aldaketa salbuespen gisa eta modu justifikatuan tratatu behar dela, lizitazioen izaera lehiakorra ez kaltetzearren. Lan honetan aztertu nahi dena da Sektore Publikoko Kontratuen Legeak 2014 Zuzentarauari egin dion transposizioa. ABSTRACT: In the framework of the execution of a public contract some specific causes can change its nature and therefore make necessary some amendments. The contrast that occurs in those cases between the public interest aimed at the maintenance of the contract although it involves an amendment and the premature termination of it due to the inability to perform the agreed service, has provoked that national and european legislators priorize in some occasiones for one or the other. The Spanish legislation up until the passing of the Sustainable Economy Act was very timid regading the control of amendments. Once Directives from 2014 about public procurement were enacted it was neccesary their transposition by following the line that understands that the modifications should be addressed as exceptional and justified with the purpose of not undermining the competitive nature of bidding. We try to analyze the transposition of the Directive from 2014 by the Public Sector Contracts Act. RESUMEN: En el marco de la ejecución de un contrato público pueden darse determinadas causas que alteren su naturaleza y, por tanto, hagan necesarias algunas modificaciones. La contraposición que en estas ocasiones se produce entre el interés público ínsito en el mantenimiento un contrato, aunque suponga una modificación, y la resolución anticipada del mismo por la imposibilidad de realizar la prestación pactada, ha provocado que el legislador nacional y europeo se decante en distintas ocasiones por uno u otro. La legislación española hasta la Ley de Economía Sostenible se mostró muy tímida en el control de los modificados. Una vez aprobadas las Directivas 2014 sobre contratación fue necesario a través de su trasposición seguir la línea emprendida en el sentido de entender que la modificación debe tratarse de manera excepcional y justificadamente para no desvirtuar el carácter competitivo de la licitación. Se pretende analizar en este estudio la trasposición de la Directiva 2014 por parte de la LCSP.


2018 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 533-546
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Kocowski

NON-POSSESSION OF THE REQUIRED DECISION AND VALIDITY OF THE CONTRACT IN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY SPHERE OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENTIn the case of public procurement, the non-possession of the required decision by the contractor by the law and the terms of the proceedings results in the exclusion of the contractor from the award procedure and rejection of its off er. In this case, the public contract is not concluded. Public procurement are contracts concluded in conditions where it is difficult to talk about the implementation of the principle of freedom of contract. It remains to be determined what effect would be caused by the lack, on the part of the contractor, of the empowerment decisions required by law, if the contract were concluded under conditions of freedom of contract.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Leśniak ◽  
F. Janowiec

AbstractParticular diligence in the preparation of documentation and conducting a tender procedure for construction works must be made by public contracting entities, who are subject to additional restrictions. In Poland, the largest public contracting entities are the sectoral ones. These are the entities (defined in Art. 3 of the Public Procurement Law Act) operating in the sectors of water management, energy, transport and postal services. The paper presents the analysis of tender offers for the execution of construction works or design and execution of construction works related to the reconstruction, construction and revitalization of railway lines, announced after the amendment to the Public Procurement Law on June 22, 2016. The considered examples are selected tender procedures covering the scope of construction and assembly works on railway lines throughout the country. The authors paid particular attention to the tender criteria applied and the requirements for the potential contractors for works in the field of railway infrastructure


Author(s):  
Pauline Debono

The terms governing the provision of supplies, services, or works by an economic operator to a governmental entity are set into a public contract that is signed, following a procurement process. This article explores whether the public administration can utilise smart contracts to incorporate the terms governing the provision of supplies, services, or works. The fundamental elements of a contract are assessed, in order to determine whether a smart contract can be considered as fulfilling these requirements. Following this assessment, the main hurdles to the use of smart contracting are examined and a possible solution proposed. The case for utilising smart contracting within the realm of public procurement is finally advocated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document