A study on Chinese-Korean translation of ‘journey metaphor’ in political speech.

Si-Yuan Liu;

doi:10.20305/it202103079110

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech

10.35542/osf.io/857yd ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Adib Rifqi Setiawan

Keyword(s):

Discourse Analysis ◽

Critical Discourse Analysis ◽

Political Discourse ◽

Critical Discourse ◽

The Political ◽

Political Speech ◽

Political Purpose

The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the political speech. This article analyzes Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech, mainly in Festival 11 by Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI), that is exclusively based on the perspective of Teun Adrianus van Dijk. It reveals that we can learn how to deliver our ideology to public. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.

Download Full-text

Is She a Pawn, Prodigy or Person with a Message? Public Responses to a Child's Political Speech

Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie ◽

10.2307/canajsocicahican.40.2.163 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 40 (2) ◽

pp. 163 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Rebecca Raby ◽

Mary-Beth Raddon

Keyword(s):

Political Speech

Download Full-text

Sedition in Liberal Democracies

10.1093/oso/9780199481699.001.0001 ◽

2018 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Anushka Singh

Keyword(s):

Freedom Of Expression ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Community Based ◽

Political Speech ◽

Liberal Democracies ◽

Indian Experience ◽

Judicial Discourse ◽

The Law ◽

The Government ◽

The Right

Liberal democracies claim to give constitutional and legal protection of varying degrees to the right to free speech of which political speech and the right to dissent are extensions. Within the right to freedom of expression, however, some category of speeches do not enjoy protection as they are believed to be ‘injurious’ to society. One such unprotected form of political speech is sedition which is criminalized for the repercussions it may have on the authority of the government and the state. The cases registered in India in recent months under the law against sedition show that the law in its wide and diverse deployment was used against agitators in a community-based pro-reservation movement, a group of university students for their alleged ‘anti-national’ statements, anti-liquor activists, to name a few. Set against its contemporary use, this book has used sedition as a lens to probe the fate of political speech in liberal democracies. The work is done in a comparative framework keeping the Indian experience as its focus, bringing in inferences from England, USA, and Australia to intervene and contribute to the debates on the concept of sedition within liberal democracies at large. On the basis of an analytical enquiry into the judicial discourse around sedition, the text of the sedition laws, their political uses, their quotidian existence, and their entanglement with the counter-terror legislations, the book theorizes upon the life of the law within liberal democracies.

Download Full-text

Privacy in Public: A Democratic Defense

Moral Philosophy and Politics ◽

10.1515/mopp-2019-0031 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. 73-96

Author(s):

Titus Stahl

Keyword(s):

Public Sphere ◽

Privacy Protection ◽

Self Determination ◽

Democratic Legitimacy ◽

Political Speech ◽

The Public ◽

The Public Sphere

AbstractTraditional arguments for privacy in public suggest that intentionally public activities, such as political speech, do not deserve privacy protection. In this article, I develop a new argument for the view that surveillance of intentionally public activities should be limited to protect the specific good that this context provides, namely democratic legitimacy. Combining insights from Helen Nissenbaum’s contextualism and Jürgen Habermas’s theory of the public sphere, I argue that strategic surveillance of the public sphere can undermine the capacity of citizens to freely deliberate in public and therefore conflicts with democratic self-determination.

Download Full-text